[May 5, 1840.]

We have undertaken to discourse here for a little on Great Men, their manner of appearance in our world’s business, how they have shaped themselves in the world’s history, what ideas men formed of them, what work they did; ­on Heroes, namely, and on their reception and performance; what I call Hero-worship and the Heroic in human affairs.  Too evidently this is a large topic; deserving quite other treatment than we can expect to give it at present.  A large topic; indeed, an illimitable one; wide as Universal History itself.  For, as I take it, Universal History, the history of what man has accomplished in this world, is at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here.  They were the leaders of men, these great ones; the modellers, patterns, and in a wide sense creators, of whatsoever the general mass of men contrived to do or to attain; all things that we see standing accomplished in the world are properly the outer material result, the practical realization and embodiment, of Thoughts that dwelt in the Great Men sent into the world:  the soul of the whole world’s history, it may justly be considered, were the history of these.  Too clearly it is a topic we shall do no justice to in this place!

One comfort is, that Great Men, taken up in any way, are profitable company.  We cannot look, however imperfectly, upon a great man, without gaining something by him.  He is the living light-fountain, which it is good and pleasant to be near.  The light which enlightens, which has enlightened the darkness of the world; and this not as a kindled lamp only, but rather as a natural luminary shining by the gift of Heaven; a flowing light-fountain, as I say, of native original insight, of manhood and heroic nobleness; ­in whose radiance all souls feel that it is well with them.  On any terms whatsoever, you will not grudge to wander in such neighborhood for a while.  These Six classes of Heroes, chosen out of widely distant countries and epochs, and in mere external figure differing altogether, ought, if we look faithfully at them, to illustrate several things for us.  Could we see them well, we should get some glimpses into the very marrow of the world’s history.  How happy, could I but, in any measure, in such times as these, make manifest to you the meanings of Heroism; the divine relation (for I may well call it such) which in all times unites a Great Man to other men; and thus, as it were, not exhaust my subject, but so much as break ground on it!  At all events, I must make the attempt.

It is well said, in every sense, that a man’s religion is the chief fact with regard to him.  A man’s, or a nation of men’s.  By religion I do not mean here the church-creed which he professes, the articles of faith which he will sign and, in words or otherwise, assert; not this wholly, in many cases not this at all.  We see men of all kinds of professed creeds attain to almost all degrees of worth or worthlessness under each or any of them.  This is not what I call religion, this profession and assertion; which is often only a profession and assertion from the outworks of the man, from the mere argumentative region of him, if even so deep as that.  But the thing a man does practically believe (and this is often enough without asserting it even to himself, much less to others); the thing a man does practically lay to heart, and know for certain, concerning his vital relations to this mysterious Universe, and his duty and destiny there, that is in all cases the primary thing for him, and creatively determines all the rest.  That is his religion; or, it may be, his mere scepticism and no-religion:  the manner it is in which he feels himself to be spiritually related to the Unseen World or No-World; and I say, if you tell me what that is, you tell me to a very great extent what the man is, what the kind of things he will do is.  Of a man or of a nation we inquire, therefore, first of all, What religion they had?  Was it Heathenism, ­plurality of gods, mere sensuous representation of this Mystery of Life, and for chief recognized element therein Physical Force?  Was it Christianism; faith in an Invisible, not as real only, but as the only reality; Time, through every meanest moment of it, resting on Eternity; Pagan empire of Force displaced by a nobler supremacy, that of Holiness?  Was it Scepticism, uncertainty and inquiry whether there was an Unseen World, any Mystery of Life except a mad one; ­doubt as to all this, or perhaps unbelief and flat denial?  Answering of this question is giving us the soul of the history of the man or nation.  The thoughts they had were the parents of the actions they did; their feelings were parents of their thoughts:  it was the unseen and spiritual in them that determined the outward and actual; ­their religion, as I say, was the great fact about them.  In these Discourses, limited as we are, it will be good to direct our survey chiefly to that religious phasis of the matter.  That once known well, all is known.  We have chosen as the first Hero in our series Odin the central figure of Scandinavian Paganism; an emblem to us of a most extensive province of things.  Let us look for a little at the Hero as Divinity, the oldest primary form of Heroism.

Surely it seems a very strange-looking thing this Paganism; almost inconceivable to us in these days.  A bewildering, inextricable jungle of delusions, confusions, falsehoods, and absurdities, covering the whole field of Life!  A thing that fills us with astonishment, almost, if it were possible, with incredulity, ­for truly it is not easy to understand that sane men could ever calmly, with their eyes open, believe and live by such a set of doctrines.  That men should have worshipped their poor fellow-man as a God, and not him only, but stocks and stones, and all manner of animate and inanimate objects; and fashioned for themselves such a distracted chaos of hallucinations by way of Theory of the Universe:  all this looks like an incredible fable.  Nevertheless it is a clear fact that they did it.  Such hideous inextricable jungle of misworships, misbeliefs, men, made as we are, did actually hold by, and live at home in.  This is strange.  Yes, we may pause in sorrow and silence over the depths of darkness that are in man; if we rejoice in the heights of purer vision he has attained to.  Such things were and are in man; in all men; in us too.

Some speculators have a short way of accounting for the Pagan religion:  mere quackery, priestcraft, and dupery, say they; no sane man ever did believe it, ­merely contrived to persuade other men, not worthy of the name of sane, to believe it!  It will be often our duty to protest against this sort of hypothesis about men’s doings and history; and I here, on the very threshold, protest against it in reference to Paganism, and to all other isms by which man has ever for a length of time striven to walk in this world.  They have all had a truth in them, or men would not have taken them up.  Quackery and dupery do abound; in religions, above all in the more advanced decaying stages of religions, they have fearfully abounded:  but quackery was never the originating influence in such things; it was not the health and life of such things, but their disease, the sure precursor of their being about to die!  Let us never forget this.  It seems to me a most mournful hypothesis, that of quackery giving birth to any faith even in savage men.  Quackery gives birth to nothing; gives death to all things.  We shall not see into the true heart of anything, if we look merely at the quackeries of it; if we do not reject the quackeries altogether; as mere diseases, corruptions, with which our and all men’s sole duty is to have done with them, to sweep them out of our thoughts as out of our practice.  Man everywhere is the born enemy of lies.  I find Grand Lamaism itself to have a kind of truth in it.  Read the candid, clear-sighted, rather sceptical Mr. Turner’s Account of his Embassy to that country, and see.  They have their belief, these poor Thibet people, that Providence sends down always an Incarnation of Himself into every generation.  At bottom some belief in a kind of Pope!  At bottom still better, belief that there is a Greatest Man; that he is discoverable; that, once discovered, we ought to treat him with an obedience which knows no bounds!  This is the truth of Grand Lamaism; the “discoverability” is the only error here.  The Thibet priests have methods of their own of discovering what Man is Greatest, fit to be supreme over them.  Bad methods:  but are they so much worse than our methods, ­of understanding him to be always the eldest-born of a certain genealogy?  Alas, it is a difficult thing to find good methods for! ­We shall begin to have a chance of understanding Paganism, when we first admit that to its followers it was, at one time, earnestly true.  Let us consider it very certain that men did believe in Paganism; men with open eyes, sound senses, men made altogether like ourselves; that we, had we been there, should have believed in it.  Ask now, What Paganism could have been?

Another theory, somewhat more respectable, attributes such things to Allegory.  It was a play of poetic minds, say these theorists; a shadowing forth, in allegorical fable, in personification and visual form, of what such poetic minds had known and felt of this Universe.  Which agrees, add they, with a primary law of human nature, still everywhere observably at work, though in less important things, That what a man feels intensely, he struggles to speak out of him, to see represented before him in visual shape, and as if with a kind of life and historical reality in it.  Now doubtless there is such a law, and it is one of the deepest in human nature; neither need we doubt that it did operate fundamentally in this business.  The hypothesis which ascribes Paganism wholly or mostly to this agency, I call a little more respectable; but I cannot yet call it the true hypothesis.  Think, would we believe, and take with us as our life-guidance, an allegory, a poetic sport?  Not sport but earnest is what we should require.  It is a most earnest thing to be alive in this world; to die is not sport for a man.  Man’s life never was a sport to him; it was a stern reality, altogether a serious matter to be alive!

I find, therefore, that though these Allegory theorists are on the way towards truth in this matter, they have not reached it either.  Pagan Religion is indeed an Allegory, a Symbol of what men felt and knew about the Universe; and all Religions are symbols of that, altering always as that alters:  but it seems to me a radical perversion, and even inversion, of the business, to put that forward as the origin and moving cause, when it was rather the result and termination.  To get beautiful allegories, a perfect poetic symbol, was not the want of men; but to know what they were to believe about this Universe, what course they were to steer in it; what, in this mysterious Life of theirs, they had to hope and to fear, to do and to forbear doing.  The Pilgrim’s Progress is an Allegory, and a beautiful, just and serious one:  but consider whether Bunyan’s Allegory could have preceded the Faith it symbolizes!  The Faith had to be already there, standing believed by everybody; ­of which the Allegory could then become a shadow; and, with all its seriousness, we may say a sportful shadow, a mere play of the Fancy, in comparison with that awful Fact and scientific certainty which it poetically strives to emblem.  The Allegory is the product of the certainty, not the producer of it; not in Bunyan’s nor in any other case.  For Paganism, therefore, we have still to inquire, Whence came that scientific certainty, the parent of such a bewildered heap of allegories, errors and confusions?  How was it, what was it?

Surely it were a foolish attempt to pretend “explaining,” in this place, or in any place, such a phenomenon as that far-distant distracted cloudy imbroglio of Paganism, ­more like a cloud-field than a distant continent of firm land and facts!  It is no longer a reality, yet it was one.  We ought to understand that this seeming cloud-field was once a reality; that not poetic allegory, least of all that dupery and deception was the origin of it.  Men, I say, never did believe idle songs, never risked their soul’s life on allegories:  men in all times, especially in early earnest times, have had an instinct for detecting quacks, for detesting quacks.  Let us try if, leaving out both the quack theory and the allegory one, and listening with affectionate attention to that far-off confused rumor of the Pagan ages, we cannot ascertain so much as this at least, That there was a kind of fact at the heart of them; that they too were not mendacious and distracted, but in their own poor way true and sane!

You remember that fancy of Plato’s, of a man who had grown to maturity in some dark distance, and was brought on a sudden into the upper air to see the sun rise.  What would his wonder be, his rapt astonishment at the sight we daily witness with indifference!  With the free open sense of a child, yet with the ripe faculty of a man, his whole heart would be kindled by that sight, he would discern it well to be Godlike, his soul would fall down in worship before it.  Now, just such a childlike greatness was in the primitive nations.  The first Pagan Thinker among rude men, the first man that began to think, was precisely this child-man of Plato’s.  Simple, open as a child, yet with the depth and strength of a man.  Nature had as yet no name to him; he had not yet united under a name the infinite variety of sights, sounds, shapes and motions, which we now collectively name Universe, Nature, or the like, ­and so with a name dismiss it from us.  To the wild deep-hearted man all was yet new, not veiled under names or formulas; it stood naked, flashing in on him there, beautiful, awful, unspeakable.  Nature was to this man, what to the Thinker and Prophet it forever is, preternatural.  This green flowery rock-built earth, the trees, the mountains, rivers, many-sounding seas; ­that great deep sea of azure that swims overhead; the winds sweeping through it; the black cloud fashioning itself together, now pouring out fire, now hail and rain; what is it?  Ay, what?  At bottom we do not yet know; we can never know at all.  It is not by our superior insight that we escape the difficulty; it is by our superior levity, our inattention, our want of insight.  It is by not thinking that we cease to wonder at it.  Hardened round us, encasing wholly every notion we form, is a wrappage of traditions, hearsays, mere words.  We call that fire of the black thunder-cloud “electricity,” and lecture learnedly about it, and grind the like of it out of glass and silk:  but what is it?  What made it?  Whence comes it?  Whither goes it?  Science has done much for us; but it is a poor science that would hide from us the great deep sacred infinitude of Nescience, whither we can never penetrate, on which all science swims as a mere superficial film.  This world, after all our science and sciences, is still a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and more, to whosoever will think of it.

That great mystery of TIME, were there no other; the illimitable, silent, never-resting thing called Time, rolling, rushing on, swift, silent, like an all-embracing ocean-tide, on which we and all the Universe swim like exhalations, like apparitions which are, and then are not:  this is forever very literally a miracle; a thing to strike us dumb, ­for we have no word to speak about it.  This Universe, ah me ­what could the wild man know of it; what can we yet know?  That it is a Force, and thousand-fold Complexity of Forces; a Force which is not we.  That is all; it is not we, it is altogether different from us.  Force, Force, everywhere Force; we ourselves a mysterious Force in the centre of that.  “There is not a leaf rotting on the highway but has Force in it; how else could it rot?” Nay surely, to the Atheistic Thinker, if such a one were possible, it must be a miracle too, this huge illimitable whirlwind of Force, which envelops us here; never-resting whirlwind, high as Immensity, old as Eternity.  What is it?  God’s Creation, the religious people answer; it is the Almighty God’s!  Atheistic science babbles poorly of it, with scientific nomenclatures, experiments and what not, as if it were a poor dead thing, to be bottled up in Leyden jars and sold over counters:  but the natural sense of man, in all times, if he will honestly apply his sense, proclaims it to be a living thing, ­ah, an unspeakable, godlike thing; towards which the best attitude for us, after never so much science, is awe, devout prostration and humility of soul; worship if not in words, then in silence.

But now I remark farther:  What in such a time as ours it requires a Prophet or Poet to teach us, namely, the stripping-off of those poor undevout wrappages, nomenclatures and scientific hearsays, ­this, the ancient earnest soul, as yet unencumbered with these things, did for itself.  The world, which is now divine only to the gifted, was then divine to whosoever would turn his eye upon it.  He stood bare before it face to face.  “All was Godlike or God:” ­Jean Paul still finds it so; the giant Jean Paul, who has power to escape out of hearsays:  but there then were no hearsays.  Canopus shining down over the desert, with its blue diamond brightness (that wild blue spirit-like brightness, far brighter than we ever witness here), would pierce into the heart of the wild Ishmaelitish man, whom it was guiding through the solitary waste there.  To his wild heart, with all feelings in it, with no speech for any feeling, it might seem a little eye, that Canopus, glancing out on him from the great deep Eternity; revealing the inner Splendor to him.  Cannot we understand how these men worshipped Canopus; became what we call Sabeans, worshipping the stars?  Such is to me the secret of all forms of Paganism.  Worship is transcendent wonder; wonder for which there is now no limit or measure; that is worship.  To these primeval men, all things and everything they saw exist beside them were an emblem of the Godlike, of some God.

And look what perennial fibre of truth was in that.  To us also, through every star, through every blade of grass, is not a God made visible, if we will open our minds and eyes?  We do not worship in that way now:  but is it not reckoned still a merit, proof of what we call a “poetic nature,” that we recognize how every object has a divine beauty in it; how every object still verily is “a window through which we may look into Infinitude itself”?  He that can discern the loveliness of things, we call him Poet!  Painter, Man of Genius, gifted, lovable.  These poor Sabeans did even what he does, ­in their own fashion.  That they did it, in what fashion soever, was a merit:  better than what the entirely stupid man did, what the horse and camel did, ­namely, nothing!

But now if all things whatsoever that we look upon are emblems to us of the Highest God, I add that more so than any of them is man such an emblem.  You have heard of St. Chrysostom’s celebrated saying in reference to the Shekinah, or Ark of Testimony, visible Revelation of God, among the Hebrews:  “The true Shekinah is Man!” Yes, it is even so:  this is no vain phrase; it is veritably so.  The essence of our being, the mystery in us that calls itself “I,” ­ah, what words have we for such things? ­is a breath of Heaven; the Highest Being reveals himself in man.  This body, these faculties, this life of ours, is it not all as a vesture for that Unnamed?  “There is but one Temple in the Universe,” says the devout Novalis, “and that is the Body of Man.  Nothing is holier shall that high form.  Bending before men is a reverence done to this Revelation in the Flesh.  We touch Heaven when we lay our hand on a human body!” This sounds much like a mere flourish of rhetoric; but it is not so.  If well meditated, it will turn out to be a scientific fact; the expression, in such words as can be had, of the actual truth of the thing.  We are the miracle of miracles, ­the great inscrutable mystery of God.  We cannot understand it, we know not how to speak of it; but we may feel and know, if we like, that it is verily so.

Well; these truths were once more readily felt than now.  The young generations of the world, who had in them the freshness of young children, and yet the depth of earnest men, who did not think that they had finished off all things in Heaven and Earth by merely giving them scientific names, but had to gaze direct at them there, with awe and wonder:  they felt better what of divinity is in man and Nature; they, without being mad, could worship Nature, and man more than anything else in Nature.  Worship, that is, as I said above, admire without limit:  this, in the full use of their faculties, with all sincerity of heart, they could do.  I consider Hero-worship to be the grand modifying element in that ancient system of thought.  What I called the perplexed jungle of Paganism sprang, we may say, out of many roots:  every admiration, adoration of a star or natural object, was a root or fibre of a root; but Hero-worship is the deepest root of all; the tap-root, from which in a great degree all the rest were nourished and grown.

And now if worship even of a star had some meaning in it, how much more might that of a Hero!  Worship of a Hero is transcendent admiration of a Great Man.  I say great men are still admirable; I say there is, at bottom, nothing else admirable!  No nobler feeling than this of admiration for one higher than himself dwells in the breast of man.  It is to this hour, and at all hours, the vivifying influence in man’s life.  Religion I find stand upon it; not Paganism only, but far higher and truer religions, ­all religion hitherto known.  Hero-worship, heartfelt prostrate admiration, submission, burning, boundless, for a noblest godlike Form of Man, ­is not that the germ of Christianity itself?  The greatest of all Heroes is One ­whom we do not name here!  Let sacred silence meditate that sacred matter; you will find it the ultimate perfection of a principle extant throughout man’s whole history on earth.

Or coming into lower, less unspeakable provinces, is not all Loyalty akin to religious Faith also?  Faith is loyalty to some inspired Teacher, some spiritual Hero.  And what therefore is loyalty proper, the life-breath of all society, but an effluence of Hero-worship, submissive admiration for the truly great?  Society is founded on Hero-worship.  All dignities of rank, on which human association rests, are what we may call a Heroarchy (Government of Heroes), ­or a Hierarchy, for it is “sacred” enough withal!  The Duke means Dux, Leader; King is Kon-ning, Kan-ning, Man that knows or cans.  Society everywhere is some representation, not insupportably inaccurate, of a graduated Worship of Heroes ­reverence and obedience done to men really great and wise.  Not insupportably inaccurate, I say!  They are all as bank-notes, these social dignitaries, all representing gold; ­and several of them, alas, always are forged notes.  We can do with some forged false notes; with a good many even; but not with all, or the most of them forged!  No:  there have to come revolutions then; cries of Democracy, Liberty and Equality, and I know not what: ­the notes being all false, and no gold to be had for them, people take to crying in their despair that there is no gold, that there never was any!  “Gold,” Hero-worship, is nevertheless, as it was always and everywhere, and cannot cease till man himself ceases.

I am well aware that in these days Hero-worship, the thing I call Hero-worship, professes to have gone out, and finally ceased.  This, for reasons which it will be worth while some time to inquire into, is an age that as it were denies the existence of great men; denies the desirableness of great men.  Show our critics a great man, a Luther for example, they begin to what they call “account” for him; not to worship him, but take the dimensions of him, ­and bring him out to be a little kind of man!  He was the “creature of the Time,” they say; the Time called him forth, the Time did everything, he nothing ­but what we the little critic could have done too!  This seems to me but melancholy work.  The Time call forth?  Alas, we have known Times call loudly enough for their great man; but not find him when they called!  He was not there; Providence had not sent him; the Time, calling its loudest, had to go down to confusion and wreck because he would not come when called.

For if we will think of it, no Time need have gone to ruin, could it have found a man great enough, a man wise and good enough:  wisdom to discern truly what the Time wanted, valor to lead it on the right road thither; these are the salvation of any Time.  But I liken common languid Times, with their unbelief, distress, perplexity, with their languid doubting characters and embarrassed circumstances, impotently crumbling down into ever worse distress towards final ruin; ­all this I liken to dry dead fuel, waiting for the lightning out of Heaven that shall kindle it.  The great man, with his free force direct out of God’s own hand, is the lightning.  His word is the wise healing word which all can believe in.  All blazes round him now, when he has once struck on it, into fire like his own.  The dry mouldering sticks are thought to have called him forth.  They did want him greatly; but as to calling him forth !  Those are critics of small vision, I think, who cry:  “See, is it not the sticks that made the fire?” No sadder proof can be given by a man of his own littleness than disbelief in great men.  There is no sadder symptom of a generation than such general blindness to the spiritual lightning, with faith only in the heap of barren dead fuel.  It is the last consummation of unbelief.  In all epochs of the world’s history, we shall find the Great Man to have been the indispensable savior of his epoch; ­the lightning, without which the fuel never would have burnt.  The History of the World, I said already, was the Biography of Great Men.

Such small critics do what they can to promote unbelief and universal spiritual paralysis:  but happily they cannot always completely succeed.  In all times it is possible for a man to arise great enough to feel that they and their doctrines are chimeras and cobwebs.  And what is notable, in no time whatever can they entirely eradicate out of living men’s hearts a certain altogether peculiar reverence for Great Men; genuine admiration, loyalty, adoration, however dim and perverted it may be.  Hero-worship endures forever while man endures.  Boswell venerates his Johnson, right truly even in the Eighteenth century.  The unbelieving French believe in their Voltaire; and burst out round him into very curious Hero-worship, in that last act of his life when they “stifle him under roses.”  It has always seemed to me extremely curious this of Voltaire.  Truly, if Christianity be the highest instance of Hero-worship, then we may find here in Voltaireism one of the lowest!  He whose life was that of a kind of Antichrist, does again on this side exhibit a curious contrast.  No people ever were so little prone to admire at all as those French of Voltaire. Persiflage was the character of their whole mind; adoration had nowhere a place in it.  Yet see!  The old man of Ferney comes up to Paris; an old, tottering, infirm man of eighty-four years.  They feel that he too is a kind of Hero; that he has spent his life in opposing error and injustice, delivering Calases, unmasking hypocrites in high places; ­in short that he too, though in a strange way, has fought like a valiant man.  They feel withal that, if persiflage be the great thing, there never was such a persifleur.  He is the realized ideal of every one of them; the thing they are all wanting to be; of all Frenchmen the most French.  He is properly their god, ­such god as they are fit for.  Accordingly all persons, from the Queen Antoinette to the Douanier at the Porte St. Denis, do they not worship him?  People of quality disguise themselves as tavern-waiters.  The Maitre de Poste, with a broad oath, orders his Postilion, “Va bon train; thou art driving M. de Voltaire.”  At Paris his carriage is “the nucleus of a comet, whose train fills whole streets.”  The ladies pluck a hair or two from his fur, to keep it as a sacred relic.  There was nothing highest, beautifulest, noblest in all France, that did not feel this man to be higher, beautifuler, nobler.

Yes, from Norse Odin to English Samuel Johnson, from the divine Founder of Christianity to the withered Pontiff of Encyclopedism, in all times and places, the Hero has been worshipped.  It will ever be so.  We all love great men; love, venerate and bow down submissive before great men:  nay can we honestly bow down to anything else?  Ah, does not every true man feel that he is himself made higher by doing reverence to what is really above him?  No nobler or more blessed feeling dwells in man’s heart.  And to me it is very cheering to consider that no sceptical logic, or general triviality, insincerity and aridity of any Time and its influences can destroy this noble inborn loyalty and worship that is in man.  In times of unbelief, which soon have to become times of revolution, much down-rushing, sorrowful decay and ruin is visible to everybody.  For myself in these days, I seem to see in this indestructibility of Hero-worship the everlasting adamant lower than which the confused wreck of revolutionary things cannot fall.  The confused wreck of things crumbling and even crashing and tumbling all round us in these revolutionary ages, will get down so far; no farther.  It is an eternal corner-stone, from which they can begin to build themselves up again.  That man, in some sense or other, worships Heroes; that we all of us reverence and must ever reverence Great Men:  this is, to me, the living rock amid all rushings-down whatsoever; ­the one fixed point in modern revolutionary history, otherwise as if bottomless and shoreless.

So much of truth, only under an ancient obsolete vesture, but the spirit of it still true, do I find in the Paganism of old nations.  Nature is still divine, the revelation of the workings of God; the Hero is still worshipable:  this, under poor cramped incipient forms, is what all Pagan religions have struggled, as they could, to set forth.  I think Scandinavian Paganism, to us here, is more interesting than any other.  It is, for one thing, the latest; it continued in these regions of Europe till the eleventh century:  eight hundred years ago the Norwegians were still worshippers of Odin.  It is interesting also as the creed of our fathers; the men whose blood still runs in our veins, whom doubtless we still resemble in so many ways.  Strange:  they did believe that, while we believe so differently.  Let us look a little at this poor Norse creed, for many reasons.  We have tolerable means to do it; for there is another point of interest in these Scandinavian mythologies:  that they have been preserved so well.

In that strange island Iceland, ­burst up, the geologists say, by fire from the bottom of the sea; a wild land of barrenness and lava; swallowed many months of every year in black tempests, yet with a wild gleaming beauty in summertime; towering up there, stern and grim, in the North Ocean with its snow jokuls, roaring geysers, sulphur-pools and horrid volcanic chasms, like the waste chaotic battle-field of Frost and Fire; ­where of all places we least looked for Literature or written memorials, the record of these things was written down.  On the seabord of this wild land is a rim of grassy country, where cattle can subsist, and men by means of them and of what the sea yields; and it seems they were poetic men these, men who had deep thoughts in them, and uttered musically their thoughts.  Much would be lost, had Iceland not been burst up from the sea, not been discovered by the Northmen!  The old Norse Poets were many of them natives of Iceland.

Saemund, one of the early Christian Priests there, who perhaps had a lingering fondness for Paganism, collected certain of their old Pagan songs, just about becoming obsolete then, ­Poems or Chants of a mythic, prophetic, mostly all of a religious character:  that is what Norse critics call the Elder or Poetic Edda. Edda, a word of uncertain etymology, is thought to signify Ancestress.  Snorro Sturleson, an Iceland gentleman, an extremely notable personage, educated by this Saemund’s grandson, took in hand next, near a century afterwards, to put together, among several other books he wrote, a kind of Prose Synopsis of the whole Mythology; elucidated by new fragments of traditionary verse.  A work constructed really with great ingenuity, native talent, what one might call unconscious art; altogether a perspicuous clear work, pleasant reading still:  this is the Younger or Prose Edda.  By these and the numerous other Sagas, mostly Icelandic, with the commentaries, Icelandic or not, which go on zealously in the North to this day, it is possible to gain some direct insight even yet; and see that old Norse system of Belief, as it were, face to face.  Let us forget that it is erroneous Religion; let us look at it as old Thought, and try if we cannot sympathize with it somewhat.

The primary characteristic of this old Northland Mythology I find to be Impersonation of the visible workings of Nature.  Earnest simple recognition of the workings of Physical Nature, as a thing wholly miraculous, stupendous and divine.  What we now lecture of as Science, they wondered at, and fell down in awe before, as Religion The dark hostile Powers of Nature they figure to themselves as “Jotuns,” Giants, huge shaggy beings of a demonic character.  Frost, Fire, Sea-tempest; these are Jotuns.  The friendly Powers again, as Summer-heat, the Sun, are Gods.  The empire of this Universe is divided between these two; they dwell apart, in perennial internecine feud.  The Gods dwell above in Asgard, the Garden of the Asen, or Divinities; Jotunheim, a distant dark chaotic land, is the home of the Jotuns.

Curious all this; and not idle or inane, if we will look at the foundation of it!  The power of Fire, or Flame, for instance, which we designate by some trivial chemical name, thereby hiding from ourselves the essential character of wonder that dwells in it as in all things, is with these old Northmen, Loke, a most swift subtle Demon, of the brood of the Jotuns.  The savages of the Ladrones Islands too (say some Spanish voyagers) thought Fire, which they never had seen before, was a devil or god, that bit you sharply when you touched it, and that lived upon dry wood.  From us too no Chemistry, if it had not Stupidity to help it, would hide that Flame is a wonder.  What is Flame? ­Frost the old Norse Seer discerns to be a monstrous hoary Jotun, the Giant Thrym, Hrym; or Rime, the old word now nearly obsolete here, but still used in Scotland to signify hoar-frost. Rime was not then as now a dead chemical thing, but a living Jotun or Devil; the monstrous Jotun Rime drove home his Horses at night, sat “combing their manes,” ­which Horses were Hail-Clouds, or fleet Frost-Winds.  His Cows ­No, not his, but a kinsman’s, the Giant Hymir’s Cows are Icebergs:  this Hymir “looks at the rocks” with his devil-eye, and they split in the glance of it.

Thunder was not then mere Electricity, vitreous or resinous; it was the God Donner (Thunder) or Thor, ­God also of beneficent Summer-heat.  The thunder was his wrath:  the gathering of the black clouds is the drawing down of Thor’s angry brows; the fire-bolt bursting out of Heaven is the all-rending Hammer flung from the hand of Thor:  he urges his loud chariot over the mountain-tops, ­that is the peal; wrathful he “blows in his red beard,” ­that is the rustling storm-blast before the thunder begins.  Balder again, the White God, the beautiful, the just and benignant (whom the early Christian Missionaries found to resemble Christ), is the Sun, beautifullest of visible things; wondrous too, and divine still, after all our Astronomies and Almanacs!  But perhaps the notablest god we hear tell of is one of whom Grimm the German Etymologist finds trace:  the God Wunsch, or Wish.  The God Wish; who could give us all that we wished!  Is not this the sincerest and yet rudest voice of the spirit of man?  The rudest ideal that man ever formed; which still shows itself in the latest forms of our spiritual culture.  Higher considerations have to teach us that the God Wish is not the true God.

Of the other Gods or Jotuns I will mention only for etymology’s sake, that Sea-tempest is the Jotun Aegir, a very dangerous Jotun; ­and now to this day, on our river Trent, as I learn, the Nottingham bargemen, when the River is in a certain flooded state (a kind of backwater, or eddying swirl it has, very dangerous to them), call it Eager; they cry out, “Have a care, there is the Eager coming!” Curious; that word surviving, like the peak of a submerged world!  The oldest Nottingham bargemen had believed in the God Aegir.  Indeed our English blood too in good part is Danish, Norse; or rather, at bottom, Danish and Norse and Saxon have no distinction, except a superficial one, ­as of Heathen and Christian, or the like.  But all over our Island we are mingled largely with Danes proper, ­from the incessant invasions there were:  and this, of course, in a greater proportion along the east coast; and greatest of all, as I find, in the North Country.  From the Humber upwards, all over Scotland, the Speech of the common people is still in a singular degree Icelandic; its Germanism has still a peculiar Norse tinge.  They too are “Normans,” Northmen, ­if that be any great beauty !

Of the chief god, Odin, we shall speak by and by.  Mark at present so much; what the essence of Scandinavian and indeed of all Paganism is:  a recognition of the forces of Nature as godlike, stupendous, personal Agencies, ­as Gods and Demons.  Not inconceivable to us.  It is the infant Thought of man opening itself, with awe and wonder, on this ever-stupendous Universe.  To me there is in the Norse system something very genuine, very great and manlike.  A broad simplicity, rusticity, so very different from the light gracefulness of the old Greek Paganism, distinguishes this Scandinavian System.  It is Thought; the genuine Thought of deep, rude, earnest minds, fairly opened to the things about them; a face-to-face and heart-to-heart inspection of the things, ­the first characteristic of all good Thought in all times.  Not graceful lightness, half-sport, as in the Greek Paganism; a certain homely truthfulness and rustic strength, a great rude sincerity, discloses itself here.  It is strange, after our beautiful Apollo statues and clear smiling mythuses, to come down upon the Norse Gods “brewing ale” to hold their feast with Aegir, the Sea-Jotun; sending out Thor to get the caldron for them in the Jotun country; Thor, after many adventures, clapping the Pot on his head, like a huge hat, and walking off with it, ­quite lost in it, the ears of the Pot reaching down to his heels!  A kind of vacant hugeness, large awkward gianthood, characterizes that Norse system; enormous force, as yet altogether untutored, stalking helpless with large uncertain strides.  Consider only their primary mythus of the Creation.  The Gods, having got the Giant Ymer slain, a Giant made by “warm wind,” and much confused work, out of the conflict of Frost and Fire, ­determined on constructing a world with him.  His blood made the Sea; his flesh was the Land, the Rocks his bones; of his eyebrows they formed Asgard their Gods’-dwelling; his skull was the great blue vault of Immensity, and the brains of it became the Clouds.  What a Hyper-Brobdignagian business!  Untamed Thought, great, giantlike, enormous; ­to be tamed in due time into the compact greatness, not giantlike, but godlike and stronger than gianthood, of the Shakspeares, the Goethes! ­Spiritually as well as bodily these men are our progenitors.

I like, too, that representation they have of the tree Igdrasil.  All Life is figured by them as a Tree.  Igdrasil, the Ash-tree of Existence, has its roots deep down in the kingdoms of Hela or Death; its trunk reaches up heaven-high, spreads its boughs over the whole Universe:  it is the Tree of Existence.  At the foot of it, in the Death-kingdom, sit Three Nornas, Fates, ­the Past, Present, Future; watering its roots from the Sacred Well.  Its “boughs,” with their buddings and disleafings? ­events, things suffered, things done, catastrophes, ­stretch through all lands and times.  Is not every leaf of it a biography, every fibre there an act or word?  Its boughs are Histories of Nations.  The rustle of it is the noise of Human Existence, onwards from of old.  It grows there, the breath of Human Passion rustling through it; ­or storm tost, the storm-wind howling through it like the voice of all the gods.  It is Igdrasil, the Tree of Existence.  It is the past, the present, and the future; what was done, what is doing, what will be done; “the infinite conjugation of the verb To do.”  Considering how human things circulate, each inextricably in communion with all, ­how the word I speak to you to-day is borrowed, not from Ulfila the Moesogoth only, but from all men since the first man began to speak, ­I find no similitude so true as this of a Tree.  Beautiful; altogether beautiful and great.  The “Machine of the Universe,” ­alas, do but think of that in contrast!

Well, it is strange enough this old Norse view of Nature; different enough from what we believe of Nature.  Whence it specially came, one would not like to be compelled to say very minutely!  One thing we may say:  It came from the thoughts of Norse men; ­from the thought, above all, of the first Norse man who had an original power of thinking.  The First Norse “man of genius,” as we should call him!  Innumerable men had passed by, across this Universe, with a dumb vague wonder, such as the very animals may feel; or with a painful, fruitlessly inquiring wonder, such as men only feel; ­till the great Thinker came, the original man, the Seer; whose shaped spoken Thought awakes the slumbering capability of all into Thought.  It is ever the way with the Thinker, the spiritual Hero.  What he says, all men were not far from saying, were longing to say.  The Thoughts of all start up, as from painful enchanted sleep, round his Thought; answering to it, Yes, even so!  Joyful to men as the dawning of day from night; ­is it not, indeed, the awakening for them from no-being into being, from death into life?  We still honor such a man; call him Poet, Genius, and so forth:  but to these wild men he was a very magician, a worker of miraculous unexpected blessing for them; a Prophet, a God! ­Thought once awakened does not again slumber; unfolds itself into a System of Thought; grows, in man after man, generation after generation, ­till its full stature is reached, and such System of Thought can grow no farther; but must give place to another.

For the Norse people, the Man now named Odin, and Chief Norse God, we fancy, was such a man.  A Teacher, and Captain of soul and of body; a Hero, of worth immeasurable; admiration for whom, transcending the known bounds, became adoration.  Has he not the power of articulate Thinking; and many other powers, as yet miraculous?  So, with boundless gratitude, would the rude Norse heart feel.  Has he not solved for them the sphinx-enigma of this Universe; given assurance to them of their own destiny there?  By him they know now what they have to do here, what to look for hereafter.  Existence has become articulate, melodious by him; he first has made Life alive! ­We may call this Odin, the origin of Norse Mythology:  Odin, or whatever name the First Norse Thinker bore while he was a man among men.  His view of the Universe once promulgated, a like view starts into being in all minds; grows, keeps ever growing, while it continues credible there.  In all minds it lay written, but invisibly, as in sympathetic ink; at his word it starts into visibility in all.  Nay, in every epoch of the world, the great event, parent of all others, is it not the arrival of a Thinker in the world !

One other thing we must not forget; it will explain, a little, the confusion of these Norse Eddas.  They are not one coherent System of Thought; but properly the summation of several successive systems.  All this of the old Norse Belief which is flung out for us, in one level of distance in the Edda, like a picture painted on the same canvas, does not at all stand so in the reality.  It stands rather at all manner of distances and depths, of successive generations since the Belief first began.  All Scandinavian thinkers, since the first of them, contributed to that Scandinavian System of Thought; in ever-new elaboration and addition, it is the combined work of them all.  What history it had, how it changed from shape to shape, by one thinker’s contribution after another, till it got to the full final shape we see it under in the Edda, no man will now ever know:  its Councils of Trebizond, Councils of Trent, Athanasiuses, Dantes, Luthers, are sunk without echo in the dark night!  Only that it had such a history we can all know.  Wheresover a thinker appeared, there in the thing he thought of was a contribution, accession, a change or revolution made.  Alas, the grandest “revolution” of all, the one made by the man Odin himself, is not this too sunk for us like the rest!  Of Odin what history?  Strange rather to reflect that he had a history!  That this Odin, in his wild Norse vesture, with his wild beard and eyes, his rude Norse speech and ways, was a man like us; with our sorrows, joys, with our limbs, features; ­intrinsically all one as we:  and did such a work!  But the work, much of it, has perished; the worker, all to the name. “Wednesday,” men will say to-morrow; Odin’s day!  Of Odin there exists no history; no document of it; no guess about it worth repeating.

Snorro indeed, in the quietest manner, almost in a brief business style, writes down, in his Heimskringla, how Odin was a heroic Prince, in the Black-Sea region, with Twelve Peers, and a great people straitened for room.  How he led these Asen (Asiatics) of his out of Asia; settled them in the North parts of Europe, by warlike conquest; invented Letters, Poetry and so forth, ­and came by and by to be worshipped as Chief God by these Scandinavians, his Twelve Peers made into Twelve Sons of his own, Gods like himself:  Snorro has no doubt of this.  Saxo Grammaticus, a very curious Northman of that same century, is still more unhesitating; scruples not to find out a historical fact in every individual mythus, and writes it down as a terrestrial event in Denmark or elsewhere.  Torfaeus, learned and cautious, some centuries later, assigns by calculation a date for it:  Odin, he says, came into Europe about the Year 70 before Christ.  Of all which, as grounded on mere uncertainties, found to be untenable now, I need say nothing.  Far, very far beyond the Year 70!  Odin’s date, adventures, whole terrestrial history, figure and environment are sunk from us forever into unknown thousands of years.

Nay Grimm, the German Antiquary, goes so far as to deny that any man Odin ever existed.  He proves it by etymology.  The word Wuotan, which is the original form of Odin, a word spread, as name of their chief Divinity, over all the Teutonic Nations everywhere; this word, which connects itself, according to Grimm, with the Latin vadere, with the English wade and such like, ­means primarily Movement, Source of Movement, Power; and is the fit name of the highest god, not of any man.  The word signifies Divinity, he says, among the old Saxon, German and all Teutonic Nations; the adjectives formed from it all signify divine, supreme, or something pertaining to the chief god.  Like enough!  We must bow to Grimm in matters etymological.  Let us consider it fixed that Wuotan means Wading, force of Movement.  And now still, what hinders it from being the name of a Heroic Man and Mover, as well as of a god?  As for the adjectives, and words formed from it, ­did not the Spaniards in their universal admiration for Lope, get into the habit of saying “a Lope flower,” “a Lope dama,” if the flower or woman were of surpassing beauty?  Had this lasted, Lope would have grown, in Spain, to be an adjective signifying godlike also.  Indeed, Adam Smith, in his Essay on Language, surmises that all adjectives whatsoever were formed precisely in that way:  some very green thing, chiefly notable for its greenness, got the appellative name Green, and then the next thing remarkable for that quality, a tree for instance, was named the green tree, ­as we still say “the steam coach,” “four-horse coach,” or the like.  All primary adjectives, according to Smith, were formed in this way; were at first substantives and things.  We cannot annihilate a man for etymologies like that!  Surely there was a First Teacher and Captain; surely there must have been an Odin, palpable to the sense at one time; no adjective, but a real Hero of flesh and blood!  The voice of all tradition, history or echo of history, agrees with all that thought will teach one about it, to assure us of this.

How the man Odin came to be considered a god, the chief god? ­that surely is a question which nobody would wish to dogmatize upon.  I have said, his people knew no limits to their admiration of him; they had as yet no scale to measure admiration by.  Fancy your own generous heart’s-love of some greatest man expanding till it transcended all bounds, till it filled and overflowed the whole field of your thought!  Or what if this man Odin, ­since a great deep soul, with the afflatus and mysterious tide of vision and impulse rushing on him he knows not whence, is ever an enigma, a kind of terror and wonder to himself, ­should have felt that perhaps he was divine; that he was some effluence of the “Wuotan,” “Movement”, Supreme Power and Divinity, of whom to his rapt vision all Nature was the awful Flame-image; that some effluence of Wuotan dwelt here in him!  He was not necessarily false; he was but mistaken, speaking the truest he knew.  A great soul, any sincere soul, knows not what he is, ­alternates between the highest height and the lowest depth; can, of all things, the least measure ­Himself!  What others take him for, and what he guesses that he may be; these two items strangely act on one another, help to determine one another.  With all men reverently admiring him; with his own wild soul full of noble ardors and affections, of whirlwind chaotic darkness and glorious new light; a divine Universe bursting all into godlike beauty round him, and no man to whom the like ever had befallen, what could he think himself to be?  “Wuotan?” All men answered, “Wuotan!” ­

And then consider what mere Time will do in such cases; how if a man was great while living, he becomes tenfold greater when dead.  What an enormous camera-obscura magnifier is Tradition!  How a thing grows in the human Memory, in the human Imagination, when love, worship and all that lies in the human Heart, is there to encourage it.  And in the darkness, in the entire ignorance; without date or document, no book, no Arundel-marble; only here and there some dumb monumental cairn.  Why, in thirty or forty years, were there no books, any great man would grow mythic, the contemporaries who had seen him, being once all dead.  And in three hundred years, and in three thousand years !  To attempt theorizing on such matters would profit little:  they are matters which refuse to be theoremed and diagramed; which Logic ought to know that she cannot speak of.  Enough for us to discern, far in the uttermost distance, some gleam as of a small real light shining in the centre of that enormous camera-obscure image; to discern that the centre of it all was not a madness and nothing, but a sanity and something.

This light, kindled in the great dark vortex of the Norse Mind, dark but living, waiting only for light; this is to me the centre of the whole.  How such light will then shine out, and with wondrous thousand-fold expansion spread itself, in forms and colors, depends not on it, so much as on the National Mind recipient of it.  The colors and forms of your light will be those of the cut-glass it has to shine through. ­Curious to think how, for every man, any the truest fact is modelled by the nature of the man!  I said, The earnest man, speaking to his brother men, must always have stated what seemed to him a fact, a real Appearance of Nature.  But the way in which such Appearance or fact shaped itself, ­what sort of fact it became for him, ­was and is modified by his own laws of thinking; deep, subtle, but universal, ever-operating laws.  The world of Nature, for every man, is the Fantasy of Himself.  This world is the multiplex “Image of his own Dream.”  Who knows to what unnamable subtleties of spiritual law all these Pagan Fables owe their shape!  The number Twelve, divisiblest of all, which could be halved, quartered, parted into three, into six, the most remarkable number, ­this was enough to determine the Signs of the Zodiac, the number of Odin’s Sons, and innumerable other Twelves.  Any vague rumor of number had a tendency to settle itself into Twelve.  So with regard to every other matter.  And quite unconsciously too, ­with no notion of building up “Allegories “!  But the fresh clear glance of those First Ages would be prompt in discerning the secret relations of things, and wholly open to obey these.  Schiller finds in the Cestus of Venus an everlasting aesthetic truth as to the nature of all Beauty; curious: ­but he is careful not to insinuate that the old Greek Mythists had any notion of lecturing about the “Philosophy of Criticism"! ­On the whole, we must leave those boundless regions.  Cannot we conceive that Odin was a reality?  Error indeed, error enough:  but sheer falsehood, idle fables, allegory aforethought, ­we will not believe that our Fathers believed in these.

Odin’s Runes are a significant feature of him.  Runes, and the miracles of “magic” he worked by them, make a great feature in tradition.  Runes are the Scandinavian Alphabet; suppose Odin to have been the inventor of Letters, as well as “magic,” among that people!  It is the greatest invention man has ever made! this of marking down the unseen thought that is in him by written characters.  It is a kind of second speech, almost as miraculous as the first.  You remember the astonishment and incredulity of Atahualpa the Peruvian King; how he made the Spanish Soldier who was guarding him scratch Dios on his thumb-nail, that he might try the next soldier with it, to ascertain whether such a miracle was possible.  If Odin brought Letters among his people, he might work magic enough!

Writing by Runes has some air of being original among the Norsemen:  not a Phoenician Alphabet, but a native Scandinavian one.  Snorro tells us farther that Odin invented Poetry; the music of human speech, as well as that miraculous runic marking of it.  Transport yourselves into the early childhood of nations; the first beautiful morning-light of our Europe, when all yet lay in fresh young radiance as of a great sunrise, and our Europe was first beginning to think, to be!  Wonder, hope; infinite radiance of hope and wonder, as of a young child’s thoughts, in the hearts of these strong men!  Strong sons of Nature; and here was not only a wild Captain and Fighter; discerning with his wild flashing eyes what to do, with his wild lion-heart daring and doing it; but a Poet too, all that we mean by a Poet, Prophet, great devout Thinker and Inventor, ­as the truly Great Man ever is.  A Hero is a Hero at all points; in the soul and thought of him first of all.  This Odin, in his rude semi-articulate way, had a word to speak.  A great heart laid open to take in this great Universe, and man’s Life here, and utter a great word about it.  A Hero, as I say, in his own rude manner; a wise, gifted, noble-hearted man.  And now, if we still admire such a man beyond all others, what must these wild Norse souls, first awakened into thinking, have made of him!  To them, as yet without names for it, he was noble and noblest; Hero, Prophet, God; Wuotan, the greatest of all.  Thought is Thought, however it speak or spell itself.  Intrinsically, I conjecture, this Odin must have been of the same sort of stuff as the greatest kind of men.  A great thought in the wild deep heart of him!  The rough words he articulated, are they not the rudimental roots of those English words we still use?  He worked so, in that obscure element.  But he was as a light kindled in it; a light of Intellect, rude Nobleness of heart, the only kind of lights we have yet; a Hero, as I say:  and he had to shine there, and make his obscure element a little lighter, ­as is still the task of us all.

We will fancy him to be the Type Norseman; the finest Teuton whom that race had yet produced.  The rude Norse heart burst up into boundless admiration round him; into adoration.  He is as a root of so many great things; the fruit of him is found growing from deep thousands of years, over the whole field of Teutonic Life.  Our own Wednesday, as I said, is it not still Odin’s Day?  Wednesbury, Wansborough, Wanstead, Wandsworth:  Odin grew into England too, these are still leaves from that root!  He was the Chief God to all the Teutonic Peoples; their Pattern Norseman; ­in such way did they admire their Pattern Norseman; that was the fortune he had in the world.

Thus if the man Odin himself have vanished utterly, there is this huge Shadow of him which still projects itself over the whole History of his People.  For this Odin once admitted to be God, we can understand well that the whole Scandinavian Scheme of Nature, or dim No-scheme, whatever it might before have been, would now begin to develop itself altogether differently, and grow thenceforth in a new manner.  What this Odin saw into, and taught with his runes and his rhymes, the whole Teutonic People laid to heart and carried forward.  His way of thought became their way of thought: ­such, under new conditions, is the history of every great thinker still.  In gigantic confused linéaments, like some enormous camera-obscure shadow thrown upwards from the dead deeps of the Past, and covering the whole Northern Heaven, is not that Scandinavian Mythology in some sort the Portraiture of this man Odin?  The gigantic image of his natural face, legible or not legible there, expanded and confused in that manner!  Ah, Thought, I say, is always Thought.  No great man lives in vain.  The History of the world is but the Biography of great men.

To me there is something very touching in this primeval figure of Heroism; in such artless, helpless, but hearty entire reception of a Hero by his fellow-men.  Never so helpless in shape, it is the noblest of feelings, and a feeling in some shape or other perennial as man himself.  If I could show in any measure, what I feel deeply for a long time now, That it is the vital element of manhood, the soul of man’s history here in our world, ­it would be the chief use of this discoursing at present.  We do not now call our great men Gods, nor admire without limit; ah no, with limit enough!  But if we have no great men, or do not admire at all, ­that were a still worse case.

This poor Scandinavian Hero-worship, that whole Norse way of looking at the Universe, and adjusting oneself there, has an indestructible merit for us.  A rude childlike way of recognizing the divineness of Nature, the divineness of Man; most rude, yet heartfelt, robust, giantlike; betokening what a giant of a man this child would yet grow to! ­It was a truth, and is none.  Is it not as the half-dumb stifled voice of the long-buried generations of our own Fathers, calling out of the depths of ages to us, in whose veins their blood still runs:  “This then, this is what we made of the world:  this is all the image and notion we could form to ourselves of this great mystery of a Life and Universe.  Despise it not.  You are raised high above it, to large free scope of vision; but you too are not yet at the top.  No, your notion too, so much enlarged, is but a partial, imperfect one; that matter is a thing no man will ever, in time or out of time, comprehend; after thousands of years of ever-new expansion, man will find himself but struggling to comprehend again a part of it:  the thing is larger shall man, not to be comprehended by him; an Infinite thing!”

The essence of the Scandinavian, as indeed of all Pagan Mythologies, we found to be recognition of the divineness of Nature; sincere communion of man with the mysterious invisible Powers visibly seen at work in the world round him.  This, I should say, is more sincerely done in the Scandinavian than in any Mythology I know.  Sincerity is the great characteristic of it.  Superior sincerity (far superior) consoles us for the total want of old Grecian grace.  Sincerity, I think, is better than grace.  I feel that these old Northmen wore looking into Nature with open eye and soul:  most earnest, honest; childlike, and yet manlike; with a great-hearted simplicity and depth and freshness, in a true, loving, admiring, unfearing way.  A right valiant, true old race of men.  Such recognition of Nature one finds to be the chief element of Paganism; recognition of Man, and his Moral Duty, though this too is not wanting, comes to be the chief element only in purer forms of religion.  Here, indeed, is a great distinction and epoch in Human Beliefs; a great landmark in the religious development of Mankind.  Man first puts himself in relation with Nature and her Powers, wonders and worships over those; not till a later epoch does he discern that all Power is Moral, that the grand point is the distinction for him of Good and Evil, of Thou shalt and Thou shalt not.

With regard to all these fabulous delineations in the Edda, I will remark, moreover, as indeed was already hinted, that most probably they must have been of much newer date; most probably, even from the first, were comparatively idle for the old Norsemen, and as it were a kind of Poetic sport.  Allegory and Poetic Delineation, as I said above, cannot be religious Faith; the Faith itself must first be there, then Allegory enough will gather round it, as the fit body round its soul.  The Norse Faith, I can well suppose, like other Faiths, was most active while it lay mainly in the silent state, and had not yet much to say about itself, still less to sing.

Among those shadowy Edda matters, amid all that fantastic congeries of assertions, and traditions, in their musical Mythologies, the main practical belief a man could have was probably not much more than this:  of the Valkyrs and the Hall of Odin; of an inflexible Destiny; and that the one thing needful for a man was to be brave.  The Valkyrs are Choosers of the Slain:  a Destiny inexorable, which it is useless trying to bend or soften, has appointed who is to be slain; this was a fundamental point for the Norse believer; ­as indeed it is for all earnest men everywhere, for a Mahomet, a Luther, for a Napoleon too.  It lies at the basis this for every such man; it is the woof out of which his whole system of thought is woven.  The Valkyrs; and then that these Choosers lead the brave to a heavenly Hall of Odin; only the base and slavish being thrust elsewhither, into the realms of Hela the Death-goddess:  I take this to have been the soul of the whole Norse Belief.  They understood in their heart that it was indispensable to be brave; that Odin would have no favor for them, but despise and thrust them out, if they were not brave.  Consider too whether there is not something in this!  It is an everlasting duty, valid in our day as in that, the duty of being brave. Valor is still value.  The first duty for a man is still that of subduing Fear.  We must get rid of Fear; we cannot act at all till then.  A man’s acts are slavish, not true but specious; his very thoughts are false, he thinks too as a slave and coward, till he have got Fear under his feet.  Odin’s creed, if we disentangle the real kernel of it, is true to this hour.  A man shall and must be valiant; he must march forward, and quit himself like a man, ­trusting imperturbably in the appointment and choice of the upper Powers; and, on the whole, not fear at all.  Now and always, the completeness of his victory over Fear will determine how much of a man he is.

It is doubtless very savage that kind of valor of the old Northmen.  Snorro tells us they thought it a shame and misery not to die in battle; and if natural death seemed to be coming on, they would cut wounds in their flesh, that Odin might receive them as warriors slain.  Old kings, about to die, had their body laid into a ship; the ship sent forth, with sails set and slow fire burning it; that, once out at sea, it might blaze up in flame, and in such manner bury worthily the old hero, at once in the sky and in the ocean!  Wild bloody valor; yet valor of its kind; better, I say, than none.  In the old Sea-kings too, what an indomitable rugged energy!  Silent, with closed lips, as I fancy them, unconscious that they were specially brave; defying the wild ocean with its monsters, and all men and things; ­progenitors of our own Blakes and Nelsons!  No Homer sang these Norse Sea-kings; but Agamemnon’s was a small audacity, and of small fruit in the world, to some of them; ­to Hrolf’s of Normandy, for instance!  Hrolf, or Rollo Duke of Normandy, the wild Sea-king, has a share in governing England at this hour.

Nor was it altogether nothing, even that wild sea-roving and battling, through so many generations.  It needed to be ascertained which was the strongest kind of men; who were to be ruler over whom.  Among the Northland Sovereigns, too, I find some who got the title Wood-cutter; Forest-felling Kings.  Much lies in that.  I suppose at bottom many of them were forest-fellers as well as fighters, though the Skalds talk mainly of the latter, ­misleading certain critics not a little; for no nation of men could ever live by fighting alone; there could not produce enough come out of that!  I suppose the right good fighter was oftenest also the right good forest-feller, ­the right good improver, discerner, doer and worker in every kind; for true valor, different enough from ferocity, is the basis of all.  A more legitimate kind of valor that; showing itself against the untamed Forests and dark brute Powers of Nature, to conquer Nature for us.  In the same direction have not we their descendants since carried it far?  May such valor last forever with us!

That the man Odin, speaking with a Hero’s voice and heart, as with an impressiveness out of Heaven, told his People the infinite importance of Valor, how man thereby became a god; and that his People, feeling a response to it in their own hearts, believed this message of his, and thought it a message out of Heaven, and him a Divinity for telling it them:  this seems to me the primary seed-grain of the Norse Religion, from which all manner of mythologies, symbolic practices, speculations, allegories, songs and sagas would naturally grow.  Grow, ­how strangely!  I called it a small light shining and shaping in the huge vortex of Norse darkness.  Yet the darkness itself was alive; consider that.  It was the eager inarticulate uninstructed Mind of the whole Norse People, longing only to become articulate, to go on articulating ever farther!  The living doctrine grows, grows; ­like a Banyan-tree; the first seed is the essential thing:  any branch strikes itself down into the earth, becomes a new root; and so, in endless complexity, we have a whole wood, a whole jungle, one seed the parent of it all.  Was not the whole Norse Religion, accordingly, in some sense, what we called “the enormous shadow of this man’s likeness”?  Critics trace some affinity in some Norse mythuses, of the Creation and such like, with those of the Hindoos.  The Cow Adumbla, “licking the rime from the rocks,” has a kind of Hindoo look.  A Hindoo Cow, transported into frosty countries.  Probably enough; indeed we may say undoubtedly, these things will have a kindred with the remotest lands, with the earliest times.  Thought does not die, but only is changed.  The first man that began to think in this Planet of ours, he was the beginner of all.  And then the second man, and the third man; ­nay, every true Thinker to this hour is a kind of Odin, teaches men his way of thought, spreads a shadow of his own likeness over sections of the History of the World.

Of the distinctive poetic character or merit of this Norse Mythology I have not room to speak; nor does it concern us much.  Some wild Prophecies we have, as the Voluspa in the Elder Edda; of a rapt, earnest, sibylline sort.  But they were comparatively an idle adjunct of the matter, men who as it were but toyed with the matter, these later Skalds; and it is their songs chiefly that survive.  In later centuries, I suppose, they would go on singing, poetically symbolizing, as our modern Painters paint, when it was no longer from the innermost heart, or not from the heart at all.  This is everywhere to be well kept in mind.

Gray’s fragments of Norse Lore, at any rate, will give one no notion of it; ­any more than Pope will of Homer.  It is no square-built gloomy palace of black ashlar marble, shrouded in awe and horror, as Gray gives it us:  no; rough as the North rocks, as the Iceland deserts, it is; with a heartiness, homeliness, even a tint of good humor and robust mirth in the middle of these fearful things.  The strong old Norse heart did not go upon theatrical sublimities; they had not time to tremble.  I like much their robust simplicity; their veracity, directness of conception.  Thor “draws down his brows” in a veritable Norse rage; “grasps his hammer till the knuckles grow white.”  Beautiful traits of pity too, an honest pity.  Balder “the white God” dies; the beautiful, benignant; he is the Sungod.  They try all Nature for a remedy; but he is dead.  Frigga, his mother, sends Hermoder to seek or see him:  nine days and nine nights he rides through gloomy deep valleys, a labyrinth of gloom; arrives at the Bridge with its gold roof:  the Keeper says, “Yes, Balder did pass here; but the Kingdom of the Dead is down yonder, far towards the North.”  Hermoder rides on; leaps Hell-gate, Hela’s gate; does see Balder, and speak with him:  Balder cannot be delivered.  Inexorable!  Hela will not, for Odin or any God, give him up.  The beautiful and gentle has to remain there.  His Wife had volunteered to go with him, to die with him.  They shall forever remain there.  He sends his ring to Odin; Nanna his wife sends her thimble to Frigga, as a remembrance. ­Ah me !

For indeed Valor is the fountain of Pity too; ­of Truth, and all that is great and good in man.  The robust homely vigor of the Norse heart attaches one much, in these delineations.  Is it not a trait of right honest strength, says Uhland, who has written a fine Essay on Thor, that the old Norse heart finds its friend in the Thunder-god?  That it is not frightened away by his thunder; but finds that Summer-heat, the beautiful noble summer, must and will have thunder withal!  The Norse heart loves this Thor and his hammer-bolt; sports with him.  Thor is Summer-heat:  the god of Peaceable Industry as well as Thunder.  He is the Peasant’s friend; his true henchman and attendant is Thialfi, Manual Labor.  Thor himself engages in all manner of rough manual work, scorns no business for its plebeianism; is ever and anon travelling to the country of the Jotuns, harrying those chaotic Frost-monsters, subduing them, at least straitening and damaging them.  There is a great broad humor in some of these things.

Thor, as we saw above, goes to Jotun-land, to seek Hymir’s Caldron, that the Gods may brew beer.  Hymir the huge Giant enters, his gray beard all full of hoar-frost; splits pillars with the very glance of his eye; Thor, after much rough tumult, snatches the Pot, claps it on his head; the “handles of it reach down to his heels.”  The Norse Skald has a kind of loving sport with Thor.  This is the Hymir whose cattle, the critics have discovered, are Icebergs.  Huge untutored Brobdignag genius, ­needing only to be tamed down; into Shakspeares, Dantes, Goethes!  It is all gone now, that old Norse work, ­Thor the Thunder-god changed into Jack the Giant-killer:  but the mind that made it is here yet.  How strangely things grow, and die, and do not die!  There are twigs of that great world-tree of Norse Belief still curiously traceable.  This poor Jack of the Nursery, with his miraculous shoes of swiftness, coat of darkness, sword of sharpness, he is one. Hynde Etin, and still more decisively Red Etin of Ireland, in the Scottish Ballads, these are both derived from Norseland; Etin is evidently a Jotun.  Nay, Shakspeare’s Hamlet is a twig too of this same world-tree; there seems no doubt of that.  Hamlet, Amleth I find, is really a mythic personage; and his Tragedy, of the poisoned Father, poisoned asleep by drops in his ear, and the rest, is a Norse mythus!  Old Saxo, as his wont was, made it a Danish history; Shakspeare, out of Saxo, made it what we see.  That is a twig of the world-tree that has grown, I think; ­by nature or accident that one has grown!

In fact, these old Norse songs have a truth in them, an inward perennial truth and greatness, ­as, indeed, all must have that can very long preserve itself by tradition alone.  It is a greatness not of mere body and gigantic bulk, but a rude greatness of soul.  There is a sublime uncomplaining melancholy traceable in these old hearts.  A great free glance into the very deeps of thought.  They seem to have seen, these brave old Northmen, what Meditation has taught all men in all ages, That this world is after all but a show, ­a phenomenon or appearance, no real thing.  All deep souls see into that, ­the Hindoo Mythologist, the German Philosopher, ­the Shakspeare, the earnest Thinker, wherever he may be: 

     “We are such stuff as Dreams are made of!”

One of Thor’s expeditions, to Utgard (the Outer Garden, central seat of Jotun-land), is remarkable in this respect.  Thialfi was with him, and Loke.  After various adventures, they entered upon Giant-land; wandered over plains, wild uncultivated places, among stones and trees.  At nightfall they noticed a house; and as the door, which indeed formed one whole side of the house, was open, they entered.  It was a simple habitation; one large hall, altogether empty.  They stayed there.  Suddenly in the dead of the night loud noises alarmed them.  Thor grasped his hammer; stood in the door, prepared for fight.  His companions within ran hither and thither in their terror, seeking some outlet in that rude hall; they found a little closet at last, and took refuge there.  Neither had Thor any battle:  for, lo, in the morning it turned out that the noise had been only the snoring of a certain enormous but peaceable Giant, the Giant Skrymir, who lay peaceably sleeping near by; and this that they took for a house was merely his Glove, thrown aside there; the door was the Glove-wrist; the little closet they had fled into was the Thumb!  Such a glove; ­I remark too that it had not fingers as ours have, but only a thumb, and the rest undivided:  a most ancient, rustic glove!

Skrymir now carried their portmanteau all day; Thor, however, had his own suspicions, did not like the ways of Skrymir; determined at night to put an end to him as he slept.  Raising his hammer, he struck down into the Giant’s face a right thunder-bolt blow, of force to rend rocks.  The Giant merely awoke; rubbed his cheek, and said, Did a leaf fall?  Again Thor struck, so soon as Skrymir again slept; a better blow than before; but the Giant only murmured, Was that a grain of sand?  Thor’s third stroke was with both his hands (the “knuckles white” I suppose), and seemed to dint deep into Skrymir’s visage; but he merely checked his snore, and remarked, There must be sparrows roosting in this tree, I think; what is that they have dropt? ­At the gate of Utgard, a place so high that you had to “strain your neck bending back to see the top of it,” Skrymir went his ways.  Thor and his companions were admitted; invited to take share in the games going on.  To Thor, for his part, they handed a Drinking-horn; it was a common feat, they told him, to drink this dry at one draught.  Long and fiercely, three times over, Thor drank; but made hardly any impression.  He was a weak child, they told him:  could he lift that Cat he saw there?  Small as the feat seemed, Thor with his whole godlike strength could not; he bent up the creature’s back, could not raise its feet off the ground, could at the utmost raise one foot.  Why, you are no man, said the Utgard people; there is an Old Woman that will wrestle you!  Thor, heartily ashamed, seized this haggard Old Woman; but could not throw her.

And now, on their quitting Utgard, the chief Jotun, escorting them politely a little way, said to Thor:  “You are beaten then: ­yet be not so much ashamed; there was deception of appearance in it.  That Horn you tried to drink was the Sea; you did make it ebb; but who could drink that, the bottomless!  The Cat you would have lifted, ­why, that is the Midgard-snake, the Great World-serpent, which, tail in mouth, girds and keeps up the whole created world; had you torn that up, the world must have rushed to ruin!  As for the Old Woman, she was Time, Old Age, Duration:  with her what can wrestle?  No man nor no god with her; gods or men, she prevails over all!  And then those three strokes you struck, ­look at these three valleys; your three strokes made these!” Thor looked at his attendant Jotun:  it was Skrymir; ­it was, say Norse critics, the old chaotic rocky Earth in person, and that glove-house was some Earth-cavern!  But Skrymir had vanished; Utgard with its sky-high gates, when Thor grasped his hammer to smite them, had gone to air; only the Giant’s voice was heard mocking:  “Better come no more to Jotunheim!” ­

This is of the allegoric period, as we see, and half play, not of the prophetic and entirely devout:  but as a mythus is there not real antique Norse gold in it?  More true metal, rough from the Mimer-stithy, than in many a famed Greek Mythus shaped far better!  A great broad Brobdignag grin of true humor is in this Skrymir; mirth resting on earnestness and sadness, as the rainbow on black tempest:  only a right valiant heart is capable of that.  It is the grim humor of our own Ben Jonson, rare old Ben; runs in the blood of us, I fancy; for one catches tones of it, under a still other shape, out of the American Backwoods.

That is also a very striking conception that of the Ragnarok, Consummation, or Twilight of the Gods.  It is in the Voluspa Song; seemingly a very old, prophetic idea.  The Gods and Jotuns, the divine Powers and the chaotic brute ones, after long contest and partial victory by the former, meet at last in universal world-embracing wrestle and duel; World-serpent against Thor, strength against strength; mutually extinctive; and ruin, “twilight” sinking into darkness, swallows the created Universe.  The old Universe with its Gods is sunk; but it is not final death:  there is to be a new Heaven and a new Earth; a higher supreme God, and Justice to reign among men.  Curious:  this law of mutation, which also is a law written in man’s inmost thought, had been deciphered by these old earnest Thinkers in their rude style; and how, though all dies, and even gods die, yet all death is but a phoenix fire-death, and new-birth into the Greater and the Better!  It is the fundamental Law of Being for a creature made of Time, living in this Place of Hope.  All earnest men have seen into it; may still see into it.

And now, connected with this, let us glance at the last mythus of the appearance of Thor; and end there.  I fancy it to be the latest in date of all these fables; a sorrowing protest against the advance of Christianity, ­set forth reproachfully by some Conservative Pagan.  King Olaf has been harshly blamed for his over-zeal in introducing Christianity; surely I should have blamed him far more for an under-zeal in that!  He paid dear enough for it; he died by the revolt of his Pagan people, in battle, in the year 1033, at Stickelstad, near that Drontheim, where the chief Cathedral of the North has now stood for many centuries, dedicated gratefully to his memory as Saint Olaf.  The mythus about Thor is to this effect.  King Olaf, the Christian Reform King, is sailing with fit escort along the shore of Norway, from haven to haven; dispensing justice, or doing other royal work:  on leaving a certain haven, it is found that a stranger, of grave eyes and aspect, red beard, of stately robust figure, has stept in.  The courtiers address him; his answers surprise by their pertinency and depth:  at length he is brought to the King.  The stranger’s conversation here is not less remarkable, as they sail along the beautiful shore; but after some time, he addresses King Olaf thus:  “Yes, King Olaf, it is all beautiful, with the sun shining on it there; green, fruitful, a right fair home for you; and many a sore day had Thor, many a wild fight with the rock Jotuns, before he could make it so.  And now you seem minded to put away Thor.  King Olaf, have a care!” said the stranger, drawing down his brows; ­and when they looked again, he was nowhere to be found. ­This is the last appearance of Thor on the stage of this world!

Do we not see well enough how the Fable might arise, without unveracity on the part of any one?  It is the way most Gods have come to appear among men:  thus, if in Pindar’s time “Neptune was seen once at the Nemean Games,” what was this Neptune too but a “stranger of noble grave aspect,” ­fit to be “seen”!  There is something pathetic, tragic for me in this last voice of Paganism.  Thor is vanished, the whole Norse world has vanished; and will not return ever again.  In like fashion to that, pass away the highest things.  All things that have been in this world, all things that are or will be in it, have to vanish:  we have our sad farewell to give them.

That Norse Religion, a rude but earnest, sternly impressive Consecration of Valor (so we may define it), sufficed for these old valiant Northmen.  Consecration of Valor is not a bad thing!  We will take it for good, so far as it goes.  Neither is there no use in knowing something about this old Paganism of our Fathers.  Unconsciously, and combined with higher things, it is in us yet, that old Faith withal!  To know it consciously, brings us into closer and clearer relation with the Past, ­with our own possessions in the Past.  For the whole Past, as I keep repeating, is the possession of the Present; the Past had always something true, and is a precious possession.  In a different time, in a different place, it is always some other side of our common Human Nature that has been developing itself.  The actual True is the sum of all these; not any one of them by itself constitutes what of Human Nature is hitherto developed.  Better to know them all than misknow them.  “To which of these Three Religions do you specially adhere?” inquires Meister of his Teacher.  “To all the Three!” answers the other:  “To all the Three; for they by their union first constitute the True Religion.”