GOSPEL OF MAMMONISM.

Reader, even Christian Reader as thy title goes, hast thou any notion of Heaven and Hell?  I rather apprehend, not.  Often as the words are on our tongue, they have got a fabulous or semi-fabulous character for most of us, and pass on like a kind of transient similitude, like a sound signifying little.

Yet it is well worth while for us to know, once and always, that they are not a similitude, nor a fable nor semi-fable; that they are an everlasting highest fact!  “No Lake of Sicilian or other sulphur burns now anywhere in these ages,” sayest thou?  Well, and if there did not!  Believe that there does not; believe it if thou wilt, nay hold by it as a real increase, a rise to higher stages, to wider horizons and empires.  All this has vanished, or has not vanished; believe as thou wilt as to all this.  But that an Infinite of Practical Importance, speaking with strict arithmetical exactness, an Infinite, has vanished or can vanish from the Life of any Man:  this thou shalt not believe!  O brother, the Infinite of Terror, of Hope, of Pity, did it not at any moment disclose itself to thee, indubitable, un-nameable?  Came it never, like the gleam of prêternatural eternal Oceans, like the voice of old Eternities, far-sounding through thy heart of hearts?  Never?  Alas, it was not thy Liberalism, then; it was thy Animalism!  The Infinite is more sure than any other fact.  But only men can discern it; mere building beavers, spinning arachnes, much more the predatory vulturous and vulpine species, do not discern it well! ­

‘The word Hell,’ says Sauerteig, ’is still frequently in use among the English people:  but I could not without difficulty ascertain what they meant by it.  Hell generally signifies the Infinite Terror, the thing a man is infinitely afraid of, and shudders and shrinks from, struggling with his whole soul to escape from it.  There is a Hell therefore, if you will consider, which accompanies man, in all stages of his history, and religious or other development:  but the Hells of men and Peoples differ notably.  With Christians it is the infinite terror of being found guilty before the Just Judge.  With old Romans, I conjecture, it was the terror not of Pluto, for whom probably they cared little, but of doing unworthily, doing unvirtuously, which was their word for un_man_fully.  And now what is it, if you pierce through his Cants, his oft-repeated Hearsays, what he calls his Worships and so forth, ­what is it that the modern English soul does, in very truth, dread infinitely, and contemplate with entire despair?  What is his Hell, after all these reputable, oft-repeated Hearsays, what is it?  With hesitation, with astonishment, I pronounce it to be:  The terror of “Not succeeding;” of not making money, fame, or some other figure in the world, ­chiefly of not making money!  Is not that a somewhat singular Hell?’

Yes, O Sauerteig, it is very singular.  If we do not ‘succeed,’ where is the use of us?  We had better never have been born.  “Tremble intensely,” as our friend the Emperor of China says:  there is the black Bottomless of Terror; what Sauerteig calls the ’Hell of the English’! ­But indeed this Hell belongs naturally to the Gospel of Mammonism, which also has its corresponding Heaven.  For there is one Reality among so many Phantasms; about one thing we are entirely in earnest:  The making of money.  Working Mammonism does divide the world with idle game-preserving Dilettantism: ­thank Heaven that there is even a Mammonism, anything we are in earnest about!  Idleness is worst, Idleness alone is without hope:  work earnestly at anything, you will by degrees learn to work at almost all things.  There is endless hope in work, were it even work at making money.

True, it must be owned, we for the present, with our Mammon-Gospel, have come to strange conclusions.  We call it a Society; and go about professing openly the totalest separation, isolation.  Our life is not a mutual helpfulness; but rather, cloaked under due laws-of-war, named ‘fair competition’ and so forth, it is a mutual hostility.  We have profoundly forgotten everywhere that Cash-payment is not the sole relation of human beings; we think, nothing doubting, that it absolves and liquidates all engagements of man.  “My starving workers?” answers the rich mill-owner:  “Did not I hire them fairly in the market?  Did I not pay them, to the last sixpence, the sum covenanted for?  What have I to do with them more?” ­Verily Mammon-worship is a melancholy creed.  When Cain, for his own behoof, had killed Abel, and was questioned, “Where is thy brother?” he too made answer, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” Did I not pay my brother his wages, the thing he had merited from me?

O sumptuous Merchant-Prince, illustrious game-preserving Duke, is there no way of ‘killing’ thy brother but Cain’s rude way!  ’A good man by the very look of him, by his very presence with us as a fellow wayfarer in this Life-pilgrimage, promises so much:’  woe to him if he forget all such promises, if he never know that they were given!  To a deadened soul, seared with the brute Idolatry of Sense, to whom going to Hell is equivalent to not making money, all ‘promises,’ and moral duties, that cannot be pleaded for in Courts of Requests, address themselves in vain.  Money he can be ordered to pay, but nothing more.  I have not heard in all Past History, and expect not to hear in all Future History, of any Society anywhere under God’s Heaven supporting itself on such Philosophy.  The Universe is not made so; it is made otherwise than so.  The man or nation of men that thinks it is made so, marches forward nothing doubting, step after step; but marches ­whither we know!  In these last two centuries of Atheistic Government (near two centuries now, since the blessed restoration of his Sacred Majesty, and Defender of the Faith, Charles Second), I reckon that we have pretty well exhausted what of ‘firm earth’ there was for us to march on; ­and are now, very ominously, shuddering, reeling, and let us hope trying to recoil, on the cliff’s edge! ­

For out of this that we call Atheism come so many other isms and falsities, each falsity with its misery at its heels! ­A soul is not like wind (spiritus, or breath) contained within a capsule; the Almighty Maker is not like a Clockmaker that once, in old immemorial ages, having made his Horologe of a Universe, sits ever since and sees it go!  Not at all.  Hence comes Atheism; come, as we say, many other isms; and as the sum of all, comes Valetism, the reverse of Heroism; sad root of all woes whatsoever.  For indeed, as no man ever saw the above-said wind-element enclosed within its capsule, and finds it at bottom more deniable than conceivable; so too he finds, in spite of Bridgwater Bequests, your Clockmaker Almighty an entirely questionable affair, a deniable affair; ­and accordingly denies it, and along with it so much else.  Alas, one knows not what and how much else!  For the faith in an Invisible, Unnameable, Godlike, present everywhere in all that we see and work and suffer, is the essence of all faith whatsoever; and that once denied, or still worse, asserted with lips only, and out of bound prayerbooks only, what other thing remains believable?  That Cant well-ordered is marketable Cant; that Heroism means gas-lighted Histrionism; that seen with ‘clear eyes’ (as they call Valet-eyes), no man is a Hero, or ever was a Hero, but all men are Valets and Varlets.  The accursed practical quintessence of all sorts of Unbelief!  For if there be now no Hero, and the Histrio himself begin to be seen into, what hope is there for the seed of Adam here below?  We are the doomed everlasting prey of the Quack; who, now in this guise, now in that, is to filch us, to pluck and eat us, by such modes as are convenient for him.  For the modes and guises I care little.  The Quack once inevitable, let him come swiftly, let him pluck and eat me; ­swiftly, that I may at least have done with him; for in his Quack-world I can have no wish to linger.  Though he slay me, yet will I not trust in him.  Though he conquer nations, and have all the Flunkies of the Universe shouting at his heels, yet will I know well that he is an Inanity; that for him and his there is no continuance appointed, save only in Gehenna and the Pool.  Alas, the Atheist world, from its utmost summits of Heaven and Westminster-Hall, downwards through poor seven-feet Hats and ‘Unveracities fallen hungry,’ down to the lowest cellars and neglected hunger-dens of it, is very wretched.

One of Dr. Alison’s Scotch facts struck us much. A poor Irish Widow, her husband having died in one of the Lanes of Edinburgh, went forth with her three children, bare of all resource, to solicit help from the Charitable Establishments of that City.  At this Charitable Establishment and then at that she was refused; referred from one to the other, helped by none; ­till she had exhausted them all; till her strength and heart failed her:  she sank down in typhus-fever; died, and infected her Lane with fever, so that ‘seventeen other persons’ died of fever there in consequence.  The humane Physician asks thereupon, as with a heart too full for speaking, Would it not have been economy to help this poor Widow?  She took typhus-fever, and killed seventeen of you! ­Very curious.  The forlorn Irish Widow applies to her fellow-creatures, as if saying, “Behold I am sinking, bare of help:  ye must help me!  I am your sister, bone of your bone; one God made us:  ye must help me!” They answer, “No, impossible; thou art no sister of ours.”  But she proves her sisterhood; her typhus-fever kills them:  they actually were her brothers, though denying it!  Had human creature ever to go lower for a proof?

For, as indeed was very natural in such case, all government of the Poor by the Rich has long ago been given over to Supply-and-demand, Laissez-faire and suchlike, and universally declared to be ‘impossible.’  “You are no sister of ours; what shadow of proof is there?  Here are our parchments, our padlocks, proving indisputably our money-safes to be ours, and you to have no business with them.  Depart!  It is impossible!” ­Nay, what wouldst thou thyself have us do? cry indignant readers.  Nothing, my friends, ­till you have got a soul for yourselves again.  Till then all things are ‘impossible.’  Till then I cannot even bid you buy, as the old Spartans would have done, two-pence worth of powder and lead, and compendiously shoot to death this poor Irish Widow:  even that is ‘impossible’ for you.  Nothing is left but that she prove her sisterhood by dying, and infecting you with typhus.  Seventeen of you lying dead will not deny such proof that she was flesh of your flesh; and perhaps some of the living may lay it to heart.

‘Impossible:’  of a certain two-legged animal with feathers it is said, if you draw a distinct chalk-circle round him, he sits imprisoned, as if girt with the iron ring of Fate; and will die there, though within sight of victuals, ­or sit in sick misery there, and be fatted to death.  The name of this poor two-legged animal is ­Goose; and they make of him, when well fattened, Pate de foie gras, much prized by some!