GOSPEL OF DILETTANTISM.

But after all, the Gospel of Dilettantism, producing a Governing Class who do not govern, nor understand in the least that they are bound or expected to govern, is still mournfuler than that of Mammonism.  Mammonism, as we said, at least works; this goes idle.  Mammonism has seized some portion of the message of Nature to man; and seizing that, and following it, will seize and appropriate more and more of Nature’s message:  but Dilettantism has missed it wholly.  ‘Make money:’  that will mean withal, ‘Do work in order to make money.’  But, ’Go gracefully idle in Mayfair,’ what does or can that mean?  An idle, game-preserving and even corn-lawing Aristocracy, in such an England as ours:  has the world, if we take thought of it, ever seen such a phenomenon till very lately?  Can it long continue to see such?

Accordingly the impotent, insolent Donothingism in Practice and Saynothingism in Speech, which we have to witness on that side of our affairs, is altogether amazing.  A Corn-Law demonstrating itself openly, for ten years or more, with ‘arguments’ to make the angels, and some other classes of creatures, weep!  For men are not ashamed to rise in Parliament and elsewhere, and speak the things they do not think.  ‘Expediency,’ ‘Necessities of Party,’ &c. &c.!  It is not known that the Tongue of Man is a sacred organ; that Man himself is definable in Philosophy as an ‘Incarnate Word;’ the Word not there, you have no Man there either, but a Phantasm instead!  In this way it is that Absurdities may live long enough, ­still walking, and talking for themselves, years and decades after the brains are quite out!  How are ‘the knaves and dastards’ ever to be got ‘arrested’ at that rate? ­

“No man in this fashionable London of yours,” friend Sauerteig would say, “speaks a plain word to me.  Every man feels bound to be something more than plain; to be pungent withal, witty, ornamental.  His poor fraction of sense has to be perked into some epigrammatic shape, that it may prick into me; ­perhaps (this is the commonest) to be topsyturvied, left standing on its head, that I may remember it the better!  Such grinning inanity is very sad to the soul of man.  Human faces should not grin on one like masks; they should look on one like faces!  I love honest laughter, as I do sunlight; but not dishonest:  most kinds of dancing too; but the St. Vitus kind not at all!  A fashionable wit, ach Himmel! if you ask, Which, he or a Death’s-head, will be the cheerier company for me? pray send not him!”

Insincere Speech, truly, is the prime material of insincere Action.  Action hangs, as it were, dissolved in Speech, in Thought whereof Speech is the Shadow; and precipitates itself therefrom.  The kind of Speech in a man betokens the kind of Action you will get from him.  Our Speech, in these modern days, has become amazing.  Johnson complained, “Nobody speaks in earnest, Sir; there is no serious conversation.”  To us all serious speech of men, as that of Seventeenth-Century Puritans, Twelfth-Century Catholics, German Poets of this Century, has become jargon, more or less insane.  Cromwell was mad and a quack; Anselm, Becket, Goethe, ditto ditto.

Perhaps few narratives in History or Mythology are more significant than that Moslem one, of Moses and the Dwellers by the Dead Sea.  A tribe of men dwelt on the shores of that same Asphaltic Lake; and having forgotten, as we are all too prone to do, the inner facts of Nature, and taken up with the falsities and outer semblances of it, were fallen into sad conditions, ­verging indeed towards a certain far deeper Lake.  Whereupon it pleased kind Heaven to send them the Prophet Moses, with an instructive word of warning, out of which might have sprung ‘remedial measures’ not a few.  But no:  the men of the Dead Sea discovered, as the valet-species always does in heroes or prophets, no comeliness in Moses; listened with real tedium to Moses, with light grinning, or with splenetic sniffs and sneers, affecting even to yawn; and signified, in short, that they found him a humbug, and even a bore.  Such was the candid theory these men of the Asphalt Lake formed to themselves of Moses, That probably he was a humbug, that certainly he was a bore.

Moses withdrew; but Nature and her rigorous veracities did not withdraw.  The men of the Dead Sea, when we next went to visit them, were all ’changed into Apes;’ sitting on the trees there, grinning now in the most unaffected manner; gibbering and chattering very genuine nonsense; finding the whole Universe now a most indisputable Humbug!  The Universe has become a Humbug to these Apes who thought it one.  There they sit and chatter, to this hour:  only, I believe, every Sabbath there returns to them a bewildered half-consciousness, half-reminiscence; and they sit, with their wizened smoke-dried visages, and such an air of supreme tragicality as Apes may; looking out through those blinking smoke-bleared eyes of theirs, into the wonderfulest universal smoky Twilight and undecipherable disordered Dusk of Things; wholly an Uncertainty, Unintelligibility, they and it; and for commentary thereon, here and there an unmusical chatter or mew: ­truest, tragicalest Humbug conceivable by the mind of man or ape!  They made no use of their souls; and so have lost them.  Their worship on the Sabbath now is to roost there, with unmusical screeches, and half-remember that they had souls.

Didst thou never, O Traveller, fall-in with parties of this tribe?  Meseems they are grown somewhat numerous in our day.