THE GENERAL PHOTOPLAY SITUATION IN AMERICA, JANUARY 1, 1922
Especially as Viewed from the Heights
of the Civic Centre at Denver, Colorado, and the Denver
Art Museum, Which Is to Be a Leading Feature of This
Civic Centre
In the second chapter of book two,
on page 8, the theoretical outline begins, with a
discussion of the Photoplay of Action. I put there
on record the first crude commercial films that in
any way establish the principle. There can never
be but one first of anything, and if the negatives
of these films survive the shrinking and the warping
that comes with time, they will still be, in a certain
sense, classic, and ten years hence or two years hence
will still be better remembered than any films of
the current releases, which come on like newspapers,
and as George Ade says: “Nothing
is so dead as yesterday’s newspaper.”
But the first newspapers, and the first imprints of
Addison’s Spectator, and the first Almanacs
of Benjamin Franklin, and the first broadside ballads
and the like, are ever collected and remembered.
And the lists of films given in books two and three
of this work are the only critical and carefully sorted
lists of the early motion pictures that I happen to
know anything about. I hope to be corrected if
I am too boastful, but I boast that my lists must
be referred to by all those who desire to study these
experiments in their beginnings. So I let them
remain, as still vivid in the memory of all true lovers
of the photoplay who have watched its growth, fascinated
from the first. But I would add to the list of
Action Films of chapter two the recent popular example,
Douglas Fairbanks in The Three Musketeers. That
is perhaps the most literal “Chase-Picture”
that was ever really successful in the commercial
world. The story is cut to one episode.
The whole task of the four famous swordsmen of Dumas
is to get the Queen’s token that is in the hands
of Buckingham in England, and return with it to Paris
in time for the great ball. It is one long race
with the Cardinal’s guards who are at last left
behind. It is the same plot as Reynard the Fox,
John Masefield’s poem Reynard successfully
eluding the huntsmen and the dogs. If that poem
is ever put on in an Art Museum film, it will have
to be staged like one of AEsop’s Fables, with
a man acting the Fox, for the children’s
delight. And I earnestly urge all who would understand
the deeper significance of the “chase-picture”
or the “Action Picture” to give more thought
to Masefield’s poem than to Fairbanks’
marvellous acting in the school of the younger Salvini.
The Mood of the intimate photoplay, chapter
three, still remains indicated in the current films
by the acting of Lillian Gish and Mary Pickford, when
they are not roused up by their directors to turn handsprings
to keep the people staring. Mary Pickford in
particular has been stimulated to be over-athletic,
and in all her career she has been given just one
chance to be her more delicate self, and that was in
the almost forgotten film: A Romance of
the Redwoods. This is one of the serious commercial
attempts that should be revived and studied, in spite
of its crudities of plot, by our Art Museums.
There is something of the grandeur of the redwoods
in it, in contrast to the sustained Botticelli grace
of “Our Mary.”
I am the one poet who has a right
to claim for his muses Blanche Sweet, Mary Pickford,
and Mae Marsh. I am the one poet who wrote them
songs when they were Biograph heroines, before their
names were put on the screen, or the name of their
director. Woman’s clubs are always asking
me for bits of delicious gossip about myself to fill
up literary essays. Now there’s a bit.
There are two things to be said for those poems.
First, they were heartfelt. Second, any one could
improve on them.
In the fourth chapter of book two
I discourse elaborately and formally on The Motion
Picture of Fairy Splendor. And to this carefully
balanced technical discourse I would add the informal
word, this New Year’s Day, that this type is
best illustrated by such fairy-tales as have been most
ingratiatingly retold in the books of Padraic Colum,
and dazzlingly illustrated by Willy Pogany. The
Colum-Pogany School of Thought is one which the commercial
producers have not yet condescended to illustrate in
celluloid, and it remains a special province for the
Art Museum Film. Fairy-tales need not be more
than one-tenth of a reel long. Some of the best
fairy-tales in the whole history of man can be told
in a breath. And the best motion picture story
for fifty years may turn out to be a reel ten minutes
long. Do not let the length of the commercial
film tyrannize over your mind, O young art museum
photoplay director. Remember the brevity of Lincoln’s
Gettysburg address....