CALIFORNIA AND AMERICA
The moving picture captains of industry,
like the California gold finders of 1849, making colossal
fortunes in two or three years, have the same glorious
irresponsibility and occasional need of the sheriff.
They are Californians more literally than this.
Around Los Angeles the greatest and most characteristic
moving picture colonies are being built. Each
photoplay magazine has its California letter, telling
of the putting-up of new studios, and the transfer
of actors, with much slap-you-on-the-back personal
gossip. This is the outgrowth of the fact that
every type of the photoplay but the intimate is founded
on some phase of the out-of-doors. Being thus
dependent, the plant can best be set up where there
is no winter. Besides this, the Los Angeles region
has the sea, the mountains, the desert, and many kinds
of grove and field. Landscape and architecture
are sub-tropical. But for a description of California,
ask any traveller or study the background of almost
any photoplay.
If the photoplay is the consistent
utterance of its scenes, if the actors are incarnations
of the land they walk upon, as they should be, California
indeed stands a chance to achieve through the films
an utterance of her own. Will this land furthest
west be the first to capture the inner spirit of this
newest and most curious of the arts? It certainly
has the opportunity that comes with the actors, producers,
and equipment. Let us hope that every region
will develop the silent photographic pageant in a
local form as outlined in the chapter on Progress
and Endowment. Already the California sort, in
the commercial channels, has become the broadly accepted
if mediocre national form. People who revere
the Pilgrim Fathers of 1620 have often wished those
gentlemen had moored their bark in the region of Los
Angeles rather than Plymouth Rock, that Boston had
been founded there. At last that landing is achieved.
Patriotic art students have discussed
with mingled irony and admiration the Boston domination
of the only American culture of the nineteenth century,
namely, literature. Indianapolis has had her day
since then, Chicago is lifting her head. Nevertheless
Boston still controls the text-book in English and
dominates our high schools. Ironic feelings in
this matter on the part of western men are based somewhat
on envy and illegitimate cussedness, but are also
grounded in the honest hope of a healthful rivalry.
They want new romanticists and artists as indigenous
to their soil as was Hawthorne to witch-haunted Salem
or Longfellow to the chestnuts of his native heath.
Whatever may be said of the patriarchs, from Oliver
Wendell Holmes to Amos Bronson Alcott, they were true
sons of the New England stone fences and meeting houses.
They could not have been born or nurtured anywhere
else on the face of the earth.
Some of us view with a peculiar thrill
the prospect that Los Angeles may become the Boston
of the photoplay. Perhaps it would be better to
say the Florence, because California reminds one of
colorful Italy more than of any part of the United
States. Yet there is a difference.
The present-day man-in-the-street,
man-about-town Californian has an obvious magnificence
about him that is allied to the eucalyptus tree, the
pomegranate. California is a gilded state.
It has not the sordidness of gold, as has Wall Street,
but it is the embodiment of the natural ore that the
ragged prospector finds. The gold of California
is the color of the orange, the glitter of dawn in
the Yosemite, the hue of the golden gate that opens
the sunset way to mystic and terrible Cathay and Hindustan.
The enemy of California says the state
is magnificent but thin. He declares it is as
though it were painted on a Brobdingnagian piece of
gilt paper, and he who dampens his finger and thrusts
it through finds an alkali valley on the other side,
the lonely prickly pear, and a heap of ashes from
a deserted camp-fire. He says the citizens of
this state lack the richness of an aesthetic and religious
tradition. He says there is no substitute for
time. But even these things make for coincidence.
This apparent thinness California has in common with
the routine photoplay, which is at times as shallow
in its thought as the shadow it throws upon the screen.
This newness California has in common with all photoplays.
It is thrillingly possible for the state and the art
to acquire spiritual tradition and depth together.
Part of the thinness of California
is not only its youth, but the result of the physical
fact that the human race is there spread over so many
acres of land. They try not only to count their
mines and enumerate their palm trees, but they count
the miles of their sea-coast, and the acres under
cultivation and the height of the peaks, and revel
in large statistics and the bigness generally, and
forget how a few men rattle around in a great deal
of scenery. They shout their statistics across
the Rockies and the deserts to New York. The
Mississippi Valley is non-existent to the Californian.
His fellow-feeling is for the opposite coast-line.
Through the geographical accident of separation by
mountain and desert from the rest of the country,
he becomes a mere shouter, hurrahing so assiduously
that all variety in the voice is lost. Then he
tries gestures, and becomes flamboyant, rococo.
These are the defects of the motion
picture qualities also. Its panoramic tendency
runs wild. As an institution it advertises itself
with the sweeping gesture. It has the same passion
for coast-line. These are not the sins of New
England. When, in the hands of masters, they become
sources of strength, they will be a different set of
virtues from those of New England.
There is no more natural place for
the scattering of confetti than this state, except
the moving picture scene itself. Both have a genius
for gardens and dancing and carnival.
When the Californian relegates the
dramatic to secondary scenes, both in his life and
his photoplay, and turns to the genuinely epic and
lyric, he and this instrument may find their immortality
together as New England found its soul in the essays
of Emerson. Tide upon tide of Spring comes into
California through all four seasons. Fairy beauty
overwhelms the lumbering grand-stand players.
The tiniest garden is a jewelled pathway of wonder.
But the Californian cannot shout “orange blossoms,
orange blossoms; heliotrope, heliotrope!” He
cannot boom forth “roseleaves, roseleaves”
so that he does their beauties justice. Here is
where the photoplay can begin to give him a more delicate
utterance. And he can go on into stranger things
and evolve all the Splendor Films into higher types,
for the very name of California is splendor. The
California photo-playwright can base his Crowd Picture
upon the city-worshipping mobs of San Francisco.
He can derive his Patriotic and Religious Splendors
from something older and more magnificent than the
aisles of the Romanesque, namely: the groves
of the giant redwoods.
The campaign for a beautiful nation
could very well emanate from the west coast, where
with the slightest care grow up models for all the
world of plant arrangement and tree-luxury. Our
mechanical East is reproved, our tension is relaxed,
our ugliness is challenged every time we look upon
those garden paths and forests.
It is possible for Los Angeles to
lay hold of the motion picture as our national text-book
in Art as Boston appropriated to herself the guardianship
of the national text-books of Literature. If California
has a shining soul, and not merely a golden body,
let her forget her seventeen-year-old melodramatics,
and turn to her poets who understand the heart underneath
the glory. Edwin Markham, the dean of American
singers, Clark Ashton Smith, the young star treader,
George Sterling, that son of Ancient Merlin, have
in their songs the seeds of better scenarios than
California has sent us. There are two poems by
George Sterling that I have had in mind for many a
day as conceptions that should inspire mystic films
akin to them. These poems are The Night Sentries
and Tidal King of Nations.
But California can tell us stories
that are grim children of the tales of the wild Ambrose
Bierce. Then there is the lovely unforgotten Nora
May French and the austere Edward Rowland Sill.
Edison is the new Gutenberg.
He has invented the new printing. The state that
realizes this may lead the soul of America, day after
to-morrow.