DEVELOPMENT OF THE TELEGRAPH SYSTEM
For some time the telegraph line between
Washington and Baltimore remained on exhibition as
a curiosity, no charge being made for demonstrating
it. Congress made an appropriation to keep the
line in operation, Vail acting as operator at the
Washington end. On April 1, 1845, the line was
put in operation on a commercial basis, service being
offered to the public at the rate of one cent for four
characters. It was operated as a branch of the
Post-office Department. On the 4th of April a
visitor from Virginia came into the Washington office
wishing to see a demonstration. Up to this time
not a paid message had been sent. The visitor,
having no permit from the Postmaster-General, was
told that he could only see the telegraph in operation
by sending a message. One cent being all the money
he had other than twenty-dollar bills, he asked for
one cent’s worth. The Washington operator
asked of Baltimore, “What time is it?”
which in the code required but one character.
The reply came, “One o’clock,” another
single character. Thus but two characters had
been used, or one-half cent’s worth of telegraphy.
The visitor expressed himself as satisfied, and waived
the “change.” This penny was the line’s
first earnings.
Under the terms of the agreement by
which Congress had made the appropriation for the
experimental line, Morse was bound to give the Government
the first right to purchase his invention. He
accordingly offered it to the United States for the
sum of $100,000. There followed a distressing
example of official stupidity and lack of foresight.
With the opportunity to own and control the nation’s
telegraph lines before it the Government declined the
offer. This action was taken at the recommendation
of the Hon. Cave Johnson, then Postmaster-General,
under whose direction the line had been operated.
He had been a member of Congress at the time the original
appropriation was voted, and had ridiculed the project.
The nation was now so unfortunate as to have him as
its Postmaster-General, and he reported “that
the operation of the telegraph between Washington and
Baltimore had not satisfied him that, under any rate
of postage that could be adopted, its revenues could
be made equal to its expenditures.” And
yet the telegraph, here offered to the Government
for $100,000, was developed under private management
until it paid a profit on a capitalization of $100,000,000.
Morse seems to have had a really patriotic
motive, as well as a desire for immediate return and
the freedom from further worries, in his offer to
the Government. He was greatly disappointed at
its refusal to purchase, a refusal that was destined
to make Morse a wealthy man. Amos Kendall, who
had been Postmaster-General under Jackson, was now
acting as Morse’s agent, and they decided to
depend upon private capital. Plans were made
for a line between New York and Philadelphia, and
to arouse interest and secure capital the apparatus
was exhibited in New York City at a charge of twenty-five
cents a head. The public refused to patronize
in sufficient numbers to even pay expenses, and the
entire exhibition was so shabby, and the exhibitors
so poverty-stricken, that the sleek capitalists who
came departed without investing. Some of the
exhibitors slept on chairs or on the floor in the
bare room, and it is related that the man who was later
to give his name and a share of his fortune to Cornell
University was overjoyed at finding a quarter on the
sidewalk, as it enabled him to buy a hearty breakfast.
Though men of larger means refused to take shares,
some in humbler circumstances could recognize the great
idea and the wonderful vision which Morse had struggled
so long to establish a vision of a nation
linked together by telegraphy. The Magnetic Telegraph
Company was formed and work started on the line.
In August of 1845 Morse sailed for
Europe in an endeavor to enlist foreign capital.
The investors of Europe proved no keener than those
of America, and the inventor returned without funds,
but imbued with increased patriotism. He had
become convinced that the telegraph could and would
succeed on American capital alone. In the next
year a line was constructed from Philadelphia to Washington,
thus extending the New York-Philadelphia line to the
capital. Henry O’Reilly, of Rochester,
New York, took an active part in this construction
work and now took the contract to construct a line
from Philadelphia to St. Louis. This line was
finished by December of 1847.
The path having been blazed, others
sought to establish lines of their own without regard
to Morse’s patents. One of these was O Reilly,
who, on the completion of the line to St. Louis, began
one to Now Orleans, without authority from Morse or
his company. O’Reilly called his telegraph
“The People’s Line,” and when called
to account in the courts insisted not only that his
instruments were different from Morse’s, and
so no infringement of his patents, but also that the
Morse system was a harmful monopoly and that “The
People’s Line” should be encouraged.
It was further urged that Wheatstone in England and
Steinheil in Germany had invented telegraphs before
Morse, and that Professor Henry had invented the relay
which made it possible to operate the telegraph over
long distances. The suits resulted in a legal
victory for Morse, and his patents were maintained.
But still other rival companies built
lines, using various forms of apparatus, and though
the courts repeatedly upheld Morse’s patent
rights, the pirating was not effectively checked.
The telegraph had come to be a necessity and the original
company lacked the capital to construct lines with
sufficient rapidity to meet the need. Within
ten years after the first line had been put into operation
the more thickly settled portions of the United States
were served by scores of telegraph lines owned by
a dozen different companies. Hardly any of these
were making any money, though the service was poor
and the rates were high. They were all operating
on too small a scale and business uses of the telegraph
had not yet developed sufficiently.
An amalgamation of the scattered,
competing lines was needed, both to secure better
service for the public and proper dividends for the
investors. This amalgamation was effected by Mr.
Hiram Sibley, who organized the Western Union in 1856.
The plan was ridiculed at the time, some one stating
that “The Western Union seems very like collecting
all the paupers in the State and arranging them into
a union so as to make rich men of them.”
But these pauper companies did become rich once they
were united under efficient management.
The nation was just then stretching
herself across to the Pacific. The commercial
importance of California was growing rapidly.
By 1857 stage-coaches were crossing the plains and
the pony-express riders were carrying the mail.
The pioneers of the telegraph felt that a line should
span the continent. This was then a tremendous
undertaking, and when Mr. Sibley proposed that the
Western Union should undertake the construction of
such a line he was met with the strongest opposition.
The explorations of Fremont were not far in the past,
and the vast extent of country west of the Mississippi
was regarded as a wilderness peopled with savages
and almost impossible of development. But Sibley
had faith; he was possessed of Morse’s vision
and Morse’s courage. The Western Union
refusing to undertake the enterprise, he began it
himself. The Government, realizing the military
and administrative value of a telegraph line to California,
subsidized the work. Additional funds were raised
and a route selected was through Omaha and Salt Lake
City to San Francisco.
The undertaking proved less formidable
than had been anticipated, for, instead of two years,
less than five months were occupied in completing
the line. Sibley’s tact and ability did
much to avoid opposition by the Indians. He made
the red men his friends and impressed upon them the
wonder of the telegraph. When the line was in
operation between Fort Kearney and Fort Laramie he
invited the chief of the Arapahoes at Fort Kearney
to communicate by telegraph with his friend the chief
of the Sioux at Fort Laramie. The two chiefs
exchanged telegrams and were deeply impressed.
They were told that the telegraph was the voice of
the Manitou or Great Spirit. To convince them
it was suggested that they meet half-way and compare
their experiences. Though they were five hundred
miles apart, they started out on horseback, and on
meeting each other found that the line had carried
their words truly. The story spread among the
tribes, and so the telegraph line became almost sacred
to the Indians. They might raid the stations
and kill the operators, but they seldom molested the
wires.
Among many ignorant peoples the establishment
of the telegraph has been attained with no small difficulty.
The Chinese showed a dread of the telegraph, frequently
breaking down the early lines because they believed
that they would take away the good luck of their district.
The Arabs, on the other hand, did not oppose the telegraph.
This is partly because the name is one which they
can understand, tel meaning wire to them, and
araph, to know. Thus in Arabic tele-agraph
means to know by wire.
Just as the Indians of our own plains
had difficulty in understanding the telegraph, so
the primitive peoples in other parts of the world
could scarce believe it possible. A story is told
of the construction of an early line in British India.
The natives inquired the purpose of the wire from
the head man.
“The wire is to carry messages
to Calcutta,” he replied.
“But how can words run along a wire?”
they asked.
The head man puzzled for a moment.
“If there were a dog,”
he replied, “with a tail long enough to reach
from here to Calcutta, and you pinched his tail here,
wouldn’t he howl in Calcutta?”
Once Sibley and the other American
telegraph pioneers had spanned the continent, they
began plans for spanning the globe. Their idea
was to unite America and Europe by a line stretched
through British Columbia, Alaska, the Aleutian Islands,
and Siberia. Siberia had been connected with
European Russia, and thus practically the entire line
could be stretched on land, only short submarine cables
being necessary. It was then seriously doubted
that cables long enough to cross the Atlantic were
practicable. The expedition started in 1865, a
fleet of thirty vessels carrying the men and supplies.
Tremendous difficulties had been overcome and a considerable
part of the work accomplished when the successful
completion of the Atlantic cable made the work useless.
Nearly three million dollars had been expended by the
Western Union in this attempt. Yet, despite this
loss, its affairs were so generally successful and
the need for the telegraph so real that it continued
to thrive until it reached its present remarkable
development.
While the line-builders were busy
stretching telegraph wires into almost every city
and town in the nation, others were perfecting the
apparatus. Alfred Vail was a leading figure in
this work. Already he had played a large part
in designing and constructing the apparatus to carry
out Morse’s ideas, and he continued to improve
and perfect until practically nothing remained of
Morse’s original apparatus. The original
Morse transmitter had consisted of a porte-rule
and movable type. This was cumbersome, and Vail
substituted a simple key to make and break the circuit.
Vail had also constructed the apparatus to emboss
the message upon the moving strip of paper, but this
he now improved upon. The receiving apparatus
was simplified and the pen was replaced by a disk
smeared with ink which marked the dots and dashes
upon the paper.
As we have noticed, Morse took particular
pride in the fact that the receiving apparatus in
his telegraph was self-recording, and considered this
as one of the most important parts of his system.
But when the telegraph began to come into commercial
use the operators at the receiving end noticed that
they could read the messages from the long and short
periods between the clicks of the receiving mechanism.
Thus they were taking the message by ear and the recording
mechanism was superfluous. Rules and fines failed
to break them of the habit, and Vail, recognizing
the utility of the development, constructed a receiver
which had no recording device, but from which the messages
were read by listening to the clicks as the armature
struck against the frame in which it was set.
Thus the telegraph returned in its elements to the
form of Professor Henry’s original bell telegraph.
With his bell telegraph and his relay
Henry had the elements of a successful system.
He failed, however, to develop them practically or
to introduce them to the attention of the public.
He was the man of science rather than the practical
inventor. Alfred Vail, joining with Morse after
the latter had conceived the telegraph, but before
his apparatus was in practical form, was a tireless
and invaluable mechanical assistant. His inventions
of apparatus were of the utmost practical value, and
he played a very large part in bringing the telegraph
to a form where it could serve man effectively.
After success had been won Morse did not extend to
Vail the credit which it seems was his due.
Yet, though Morse made free use of
the ideas and assistance of others, he was richly
deserving of a major portion of the fame and the rewards
that came to him as inventor of the telegraph.
Morse was the directing genius; he contributed the
idea and the leadership, and bore the brunt of the
burdens when all was most discouraging.
Honors were heaped upon Morse both
at home and abroad as his telegraph established itself
in all parts of the world. Orders of knighthood,
medals, and decorations were conferred upon him.
Though he had failed to secure foreign patents, many
of the foreign governments recognized the value of
his invention, and France, Austria, Belgium, Netherlands,
Russia, Sweden, Turkey, and some smaller nations joined
in paying him a testimonial of four hundred thousand
francs. It is to be noticed that Great Britain
did not join in this testimonial, though Morse’s
system had been adopted there in preference to the
one developed by Wheatstone.
In 1871 a statue of Morse was erected
in Central Park, New York City. It was in the
spring of the next year that another statue was unveiled,
this time one of Benjamin Franklin, and Morse presided
at the ceremonies. The venerable man received
a tremendous ovation on this occasion, but the cold
of the day proved too great a strain upon him.
He contracted a cold which eventually resulted in his
death on April 2, 1872.
While extended consideration cannot
be given here to the telegraphic inventions of Thomas
A. Edison, no discussion of the telegraph should close
without at least some mention of his work in this field.
Edison started his career as a telegrapher, and his
first inventions were improvements in the telegraph.
His more recent and more wonderful inventions have
thrown his telegraphic inventions into the shadow.
On the telegraph as invented by Morse but one message
could be sent over a single wire at one time.
It was later discovered that two messages’ could
be sent over the single wire in opposite directions
at the same time. This was called duplex telegraphy.
Edison invented duplex telegraphy by which two messages
could be sent over the same wire in the same direction
at the same time. Later he succeeded in combining
the two, which resulted in the quadruplex, by which
four messages may be sent over one wire at one time.
Though Edison received comparatively little for this
invention, its commercial value may be estimated from
the statement by the president of the Western Union
that it saved that company half a million dollars in
a single year. Edison’s quadruplex system
was also adopted by the British lines.
Before this he had perfected an automatic
telegraph, work on which had been begun by George
Little, an Englishman. Little could make the
apparatus effective only over a short line and attained
no very great speed. Edison improved the apparatus
until it transmitted thirty-five hundred words a minute
between New York and Philadelphia. Such is the
perfection to which Morse’s marvel has been brought
in the hands of the most able of modern inventors.