The Morse Lectureship and the Study of Comparative
Religion.
“The investigation of the beginnings of a religion is never the
work of infidels, but of the most reverent and conscientious
minds.”
“We, the forty million souls of Japan, standing firmly and
persistently upon the basis of international justice, await still further
manifestations as to the morality of Christianity,”-Hiraii, of Japan.
“When the Creator [through intermediaries that were apparently
animals] had finished treating this world of men, the good and the bad Gods
were all mixed together promiscuously, and began disputing for the
possession of this world.”-The Aino Story of the Creation.
“If the Japanese have few beast stories, the Ainos have apparently
no popular tales of heroes ... The Aino mythologies ... lack all connection
with morality.... Both lack priests and prophets.... Both belong to a very
primitive stage of mental development ... Excepting stories ... and a few
almost metreless songs, the Ainos have no other literature at all.”-Aino
Studies.
“I asked the earth, and it answered, ‘I am not He;’ and whatsoever
are therein made the same confession. I asked the sea and the deep and the
creeping things that lived, and they replied, ‘We are not thy God; seek
higher than we.’ ... And I answered unto all things which stand about the
door of my flesh, ’Ye have told me concerning my God, that ye are not he;
tell me something about him.’ And with a loud voice they explained, ’It is
He who hath made us!’”-Augustine’s Confessions.
“Seek Him that maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the
shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night; that
calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the
earth: The lord is his name.”-Amos.
“That which hath been made was life in Him.”-John.
As a graduate of the Union Theological
Seminary in the city of New York, in the Class of
1877, your servant received and accepted with pleasure
the invitation of the President and Board of Trustees
to deliver a course of lectures upon the religions
of Japan. In that country and in several parts
of it, I lived from 1870 to 1874. I was in the
service first of the feudal daimio of Echizen and
then of the national government of Japan, helping
to introduce that system of public schools which is
now the glory of the country. Those four years
gave me opportunities for close and constant observation
of the outward side of the religions of Japan, and
facilities for the study of the ideas out of which
worship springs. Since 1867, however, when first
as a student in Rutgers College at New Brunswick,
N.J., I met and instructed those students from the
far East, who, at risk of imprisonment and death had
come to America for the culture of Christendom, I have
been deeply interested in the study of the Japanese
people and their thoughts.
To attempt a just and impartial survey
of the religions of Japan may seem a task that might
well appall even a life-long Oriental scholar.
Yet it may be that an honest purpose, a deep sympathy
and a gladly avowed desire to help the East and the
West, the Japanese and the English-speaking people,
to understand each other, are not wholly useless in
a study of religion, but for our purpose of real value.
These lectures are upon the Morse foundation which
has these specifications written out by the founder:
The general subject of the lectures
I desire to be: “The Relation of the
Bible to any of the Sciences, as Geography, Geology,
History, and Ethnology, ... and the relation of the
facts and truths contained in the Word of God,
to the principles, methods, and aims of any of
the sciences.”
Now, among the sciences which we must
call to our aid are those of geography and geology,
by which are conditioned history and ethnology of
which we must largely treat; and, most of all, the
science of Comparative Religion.
This last is Christianity’s
own child. Other sciences, such as geography
and astronomy, may have been born among lands and nations
outside of and even before Christendom. Other
sciences, such as geology, may have had their rise
in Christian time and in Christian lands, their foundation
lines laid and their main processes illustrated by
Christian men, which yet cannot be claimed by Christianity
as her children bearing her own likeness and image;
but the science of Comparative Religion is the direct
offspring of the religion of Jesus. It is a distinctively
Christian science. “It is so because it
is a product of Christian civilization, and because
it finds its impulse in that freedom of inquiry which
Christianity fosters." Christian scholars began
the investigations, formulated the principles, collected
the materials and reared the already splendid fabric
of the science of Comparative Religion, because the
spirit of Christ which was in them did signify this.
Jesus bade his disciples search, inquire, discern and
compare. Paul, the greatest of the apostolic
Christian college, taught: “Prove all things;
hold fast that which is good.” In our day
one of Christ’s loving followers expressed
the spirit of her Master in her favorite motto, “Truth
for authority, not authority for truth.”
Well says Dr. James Legge, a prince among scholars,
and translator of the Chinese classics, who has added
several portly volumes to Professor Max Mueller’s
series of the “Sacred Books of the East,”
whose face to-day is bronzed and whose hair is whitened
by fifty years of service in southern China where
with his own hands he baptized six hundred Chinamen:
The more that a man possesses the Christian
spirit, and is governed by Christian principle,
the more anxious will he be to do justice to every
other system of religion, and to hold his own
without taint or fetter of bigotry.
It was Christianity that, in a country
where the religion of Jesus has fullest liberty, called
the Parliament of Religions, and this for reasons
clearly manifest. Only Christians had and have
the requisites of success, viz.: sufficient
interest in other men and religions; the necessary
unity of faith and purpose; and above all, the brave
and bold disregard of the consequences. Christianity
calls the Parliament of Religions, following out the
Divine audacity of Him who, so often, confronting
worldly wisdom and priestly cunning, said to his disciples,
“Think not, be not anxious, take no heed, be
careful for nothing-only for love and truth.
I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.”
Of all places therefore, the study
of comparative religion is most appropriate in a Christian
theological seminary. We must know how our fellow-men
think and believe, in order to help them. It is
our duty to discover the pathways of approach to their
minds and hearts. We must show them, as our brethren
and children of the same Heavenly Father, the common
ground on which we all stand. We must point them
to the greater truth in the Bible and in Christ Jesus,
and demonstrate wherein both the divinely inspired
library and the truth written in a divine-human life
fulfil that which is lacking in their books and masters.
To know just how to do this is knowledge
to be coveted as a most excellent gift. An understanding
of the religion of our fellow-men is good, both for
him who goes as a missionary and for him who at home
prays, “Thy kingdom come.”
The theological seminary, which begins
the systematic and sympathetic study of Comparative
Religion and fills the chair with a professor who
has a vital as well as academic interest in the welfare
of his fellow-men who as yet know not Jesus as Christ
and Lord, is sure to lead in effective missionary
work. The students thus equipped will be furnished
as none others are, to begin at once the campaign of
help and warfare of love.
It may be that insight into and sympathy
with the struggles of men who are groping after God,
if haply they may find him, will shorten the polemic
sword of the professional converter whose only purpose
is destructive hostility without tactics or strategy,
or whose chief idea of missionary success is in statistics,
in blackening the character of “the heathen,”
in sensational letters for home consumption and reports
properly cooked and served for the secretarial and
sectarian palates. Yet, if true in history, Greek,
Roman, Japanese, it is also true in the missionary
wars, that “the race that shortens its weapons
lengthens its boundaries."
Apart from the wit or the measure
of truth in this sentence quoted, it is a matter of
truth in the generalizations of fact that the figure
of the “sword of the spirit, which is the word
of God,” used by Paul, and also the figure of
the “word of God, living and active, sharper
than any two-edged sword, and piercing even to the
dividing of the soul and spirit, of both joints and
marrow, and quick to discern the thoughts and intents
of the heart,” of the writer to the Hebrews,
had for their original in iron the victorious gladium
of the Roman legionary-a weapon both short
and sharp. We may learn from this substance of
fact behind the shadow of the figure a lesson for
our instant application. The disciplined Romans
scorned the long blades of the barbarians, whose valor
so often impetuous was also impotent against discipline.
The Romans measured their blades by inches, not by
feet. For ages the Japanese sword has been famed
for its temper more than its weight. The Christian
entering upon his Master’s campaigns with as
little impediments of sectarian dogma as possible,
should select a weapon that is short, sure and divinely
tempered.
To know exactly the defects of the
religion we seek to abolish, modify, supplement, supplant
or fulfil, means wise economy of force. To get
at the secrets of its hold upon the people we hope
to convert leads to a right use of power. In
a word, knowledge of the opposing religion, and especially
of alien language, literature and ways of feeling and
thinking, lengthens missionary life. A man who
does not know the moulds of thought of his hearers
is like a swordsman trying to fight at long range
but only beating the air. Armed with knowledge
and sympathy, the missionary smites with effect at
close quarters. He knows the vital spots.
Let me fortify my own convictions
and conclude this preliminary part of my lectures
by quoting again, not from academic authorities, but
from active missionaries who are or have been at the
front and in the field.
The Rev. Samuel Beal, author of “Buddhism
in China,” said that “it was plain
to him that no real work could be done among the people
[of China and Japan] by missionaries until the system
of their belief was understood.”
The Rev. James MacDonald, a veteran
missionary in Africa, in the concluding chapter of
his very able work on “Religion and Myth,”
says:
The Church that first adopts
for her intending missionaries the
study of Comparative Religion
as a substitute for subjects now
taught will lead the van in
the path of true progress.
The People of Japan.
In this faith then, in the spirit
of Him who said, “I come not to destroy but
to fulfil,” let us cast our eyes upon that part
of the world where lies the empire of Japan with its
forty-one millions of souls. Here we have not
a country like India-a vast conglomeration
of nations, languages and religions occupying a peninsula
itself like a continent, whose history consists of
a stratification of many civilizations. Nor have
we here a seemingly inert mass of humanity in a political
structure blending democracy and imperialism, as in
China, so great in age, area and numbers as to weary
the imagination that strives to grasp the details.
On the contrary, in Dai Nippon, or Great Land of the
Sun’s Origin, we have a little country easy
of study. In geology it is one of the youngest
of lands. Its known history is comparatively modern.
Its area roughly reckoned as 150,000 square miles,
is about that of our Dakotas or of Great Britain and
Ireland. The census completed December 31, 1892,
illustrates here, as all over the world, nature’s
argument against polygamy. It tells us that the
relation between the sexes is, numerically at least,
normal. There were 20,752,366 males and 20,337,574
females, making a population of 41,089,940 souls.
All these people are subjects of the one emperor,
and excepting fewer than twenty thousand savages in
the northern islands called Ainos, speak one language
and form substantially one race. Even the Riu
Kiu islanders are Japanese in language, customs and
religion. In a word, except in minor differences
appreciable or at least important only to the special
student, the modern Japanese are a homogeneous people.
In origin and formation, this people
is a composite of many tribes. Roughly outlining
the ethnology of Japan, we should say that the aborigines
were immigrants from the continent with Malay reinforcement
in the south, Koreans in the centre, and Ainos in the
east and north, with occasional strains of blood at
different periods from various parts of the Asian
mainland. In brief, the Japanese are a very mixed
race. Authentic history before the Christian
era is unknown. At some point of time, probably
later than A.D. 200, a conquering tribe, one of many
from the Asian mainland, began to be paramount on
the main island. About the fourth century something
like historic events and personages begin to be visible,
but no Japanese writings are older than the early part
of the eighth century, though almanacs and means of
measuring time are found in the sixth century.
Whatever Japan may be in legend and mythology, she
is in fact and in history younger than Christianity.
Her line of rulers, as alleged in old official documents
and ostentatiously reaffirmed in the first article
of the constitution of 1889, to be “unbroken
for ages eternal,” is no older than that of
the popes. Let us not think of Aryan or Chinese
antiquity when we talk of Japan. Her history as
a state began when the Roman empire fell. The
Germanic nations emerged into history long before
the Japanese.
Roughly outlining the political and
religious life of the ancient Japanese, we note that
their first system of government was a rude sort of
feudalism imposed by the conquerors and was synchronous
with aboriginal fetichism, nature worship, ancestral
sacrifices, sun-worship and possibly but not probably,
a very rude sort of monotheism akin to the primitive
Chinese cultus. Almost contemporary with Buddhism,
its introduction and missionary development, was the
struggle for centralized imperialism borrowed from
the Chinese and consolidated in the period from the
seventh to the twelfth century. During most of
this time Shinto, or the primitive religion, was
overshadowed while the Confucian ethics were taught.
From the twelfth to this nineteenth century feudalism
in politics and Buddhism in religion prevailed, though
Confucianism furnished the social laws or rules of
daily conduct. Since the epochal year of 1868,
with imperialism reestablished and the feudal system
abolished, Shinto has had a visible revival, being
kept alive by government patronage. Buddhism,
though politically disestablished, is still the popular
religion with recent increase of life, while Confucianism
is decidedly losing force. Christianity has begun
its promising career.
The Amalgam of Religions.
Yet in the imperial and constitutional
Japan of our day it is still true of probably at least
thirty-eight millions of Japanese that their religion
is not one, Shinto, Confucianism or Buddhism, but
an amalgam of all three. There is not in every-day
life that sharp distinction between these religions
which the native or foreign scholar makes, and which
both history and philosophy demand shall be made for
the student at least. Using the technical language
of Christian theologians, Shinto furnishes theology,
Confucianism anthropology and Buddhism soteriology.
The average Japanese learns about the gods and draws
inspiration for his patriotism from Shinto, maxims
for his ethical and social life from Confucius, and
his hope of what he regards as salvation from Buddhism.
Or, as a native scholar, Nobuta Kishimoto, expresses
it,
In Japan these three different systems
of religion and morality are not only living together
on friendly terms with one another, but, in fact,
they are blended together in the minds of the people,
who draw necessary nourishment from all of these sources.
One and the same Japanese is both a Shintoist,
a Confucianist, and a Buddhist. He plays
a triple part, so to speak ... Our religion
may be likened to a triangle.... Shintoism
furnishes the object, Confucianism offers the rules
of life, while Buddhism supplies the way of salvation;
so you see we Japanese are eclectic in everything,
even in religion.
These three religious systems as at
present constituted, are “book religions.”
They rest, respectively, upon the Kojiki and other
ancient Japanese literature and the modern commentators;
upon the Chinese classics edited and commented on
by Confucius and upon Chu Hi and other mediaeval scholastics
who commented upon Confucius; and upon the shastras
and sutras with which Gautama, the Buddha, had
something to do. Yet in primeval and prehistoric
Nippon neither these books nor the religions growing
out of the books were extant. Furthermore, strictly
speaking, it is not with any or all of these three
religions that the Christian missionary comes first,
oftenest or longest in contact. In ancient, in
mediaeval, and in modern times the student notices
a great undergrowth of superstition clinging parasitically
to all religions, though formally recognized by none.
Whether we call it fetichism, shamanism, nature worship
or heathenism in its myriad forms, it is there in
awful reality. It is as omnipresent, as persistent,
as hard to kill as the scrub bamboo which both efficiently
and sufficiently takes the place of thorns and thistles
as the curse of Japanese ground.
The book-religions can be more or
less apprehended by those alien to them, but to fully
appreciate the depth, extent, influence and tenacity
of these archaic, unwritten and unformulated beliefs
requires residence upon the soil and life among the
devotees. Disowned it may be by the priests and
sages, indignantly disclaimed or secretly approved
in part by the organized religions, this great undergrowth
of superstition is as apparent as the silicious bamboo
grass which everywhere conditions and modifies Japanese
agriculture. Such prevalence of mental and spiritual
disease is the sad fact that confronts every lover
of his fellow-men. This paganism is more ancient
and universal than any one of the religions founded
on writing or teachers of name and fame. Even
the applied science and the wonderful inventions imported
from the West, so far from eradicating it, only serve
as the iron-clad man-of-war in warm salt water serves
the barnacles, furnishing them food and hold.
We propose to give in this our first
lecture, a general or bird’s-eye view of this
dead level of paganism above which the systems of
Shinto, Confucianism and Buddhism tower like mountains.
It in by this omnipresent superstition that the respectable
religious have been conditioned in their history and
are modified at present, even as Christianity has
been influenced in its progress by ethnic or local
ideas and temperaments, and will be yet in its course
of victory in the Mikado’s empire.
Just as the terms “heathen”
(happily no longer, in the Revised Version of the
English Bible) and “pagan” suggest the
heath-man of Northern Europe and the isolated hamlet
of the Roman empire, while the cities were illuminated
with Christian truth, so, in the main, the matted
superstitious of Chinese Asia are more suggestive of
distances from books and centres of knowledge, though
still sufficiently rooted in the crowded cities.
One to whom the boundary line between
the Creator and his world is perfectly clear, one
who knows the eternal difference between mind and
matter, one born amid the triumphs of science can but
faintly realize the mental condition of the millions
of Japan to whom there is no unifying thought of the
Creator-Father. Faith in the unity of law is the
foundation of all science, but the average Asiatic
has not this thought or faith. Appalled at his
own insignificance amid the sublime mysteries and
awful immensities of nature, the shadows of his own
mind become to him real existences. As it is
affirmed that the human skin, sensitive to the effects
of light, takes the photograph of the tree riven by
lightning, so, on the pagan mind lie in ineffaceable
and exaggerated grotesqueness the scars of impressions
left by hereditary teaching, by natural phenomena
and by the memory of events and of landmarks.
Out of the soil of diseased imagination has sprung
up a growth as terrible as the drunkard’s phantasies.
The earthquake, flood, tidal wave, famine, withering
or devastating wind and poisonous gases, the geological
monsters and ravening bird, beast and fish, have their
representatives or supposed incarnations in mythical
phantasms.
Frightful as these shadows of the
mind appear, they are both very real and, in a sense,
very necessary to the ignorant man. He must have
some theory by which to explain the phenomena of nature
and soothe his own terrors. Hence he peoples
the earth and water, not only with invisible spirits
more or less malevolent, but also with bodily presences
usually in terrific bestial form. To those who
believe in one Spirit pervading, ordering, governing
all things, there is unity amid all phenomena, and
the universe is all order and beauty. To the mind
which has not reached this height of simplicity, instead
of one cause there are many. The diverse phenomena
of nature are brought about by spirits innumerable,
warring and discordant. Instead of a unity to
the mind, as of sun and solar system, there is nothing
but planets, asteroids and a constant rain of shooting-stars.
Shamanism.
Glancing at some phases of the actual
unwritten religions of Japan we name Shamanism, Mythical
Zooelogy, Fetichism, Phallicism, and Tree and Serpent
Worship.
In actual Shamanism or Animism there
may or there may not be a belief in or conception
of a single all-powerful Creator above and beyond all.
Usually there is not such a belief, though, even if
there be, the actual government of the physical world
and its surroundings is believed to lie in the hands
of many spirits or gods benevolent and malevolent.
Earth, air, water, all things teem with beings that
are malevolent and constantly active. In time
of disaster, famine, epidemic the universe seems as
overcrowded with them as stagnant water seems to be
when the solar microscope throw its contents into
apparition upon the screen. It is absolutely
necessary to propitiate these spirits by magic rites
and incantations.
Among the tribes of the northern part
of the Chinese Empire and the Ainos of Japan this
Shamanism exists as something like an organized cultus.
Indeed, it would be hard to find any part of Chinese
Asia from Korea to Annam or from Tibet to Formosa,
not dominated by this belief in the power and presence
of minor spirits. The Ainos of Yezo may be called
Shamanists or Animists; that is, their minds are cramped
and confused by their belief in a multitude of inferior
spirits whom they worship and propitiate by rites
and incantations through their medicine-man or sorcerer.
How they whittle sticks, keeping on the fringe of curled
shavings, and set up these, called inao in places
whence evil is suspected to lurk, and how the shaman
conducts his exorcisms and works his healings, are
told in the works of the traveller and the missionary.
In the wand of shavings thus reared we see the same
motive as that which induced the Mikado in the eighth
century to build the great monasteries on Hiyeizan,
northeast of Kioto, this being the quarter in which
Buddhist superstition locates the path of advancing
evil, to ward off malevolence by litanies and incense.
Or, the inao is a sort of lightning-rod conductor
by which impending mischief may be led harmlessly
away.
Yet, besides the Ainos, there
are millions of Japanese who are Shamanists, even
though they know not the name or organized cult.
And if we make use of the term Shamanism instead of
the more exact one of Animism, it is for the very
purpose of illustrating our contention that the underlying
paganisms of the Japanese archipelago, unwritten and
unformulated, are older than the religions founded
on books; and that these paganisms, still vital and
persistent, constantly modify and corrupt the recognized
religious. The term Shaman, a Pali word, was
originally a pure Buddhist term meaning one who has
separated from his family and his passions. One
of the designations of the Buddha was Shamana-Gautama.
The same word, Shamon, in Japanese still means a bonze,
or Buddhist priest. Its appropriation by the sorcerers,
medicine-men, and lords of the misrule of superstition
in Mongolia and Manchuria shows decisively how indigenous
paganism has corrupted the Buddhism of northern Asia
even as it has caused its decay in Japan.
As out of Animism or Shamanism grows
Fetichism in which a visible object is found for the
abode or medium of the spirit, so also, out of the
same soil arises what we may call Imaginary Zooelogy.
In this mental growth, the nightmare of the diseased
imagination or of the mind unable to draw the line
between the real and the unreal, Chinese Asia differs
notably from the Aryan world. With the mythical
monsters of India and Iran we are acquainted, and
with those of the Semitic and ancient European cycle
of ideas which furnished us with our ancients and classics
we are familiar. The lovely presences in human
form, the semi-human and bestial creations, sphinxes,
naiads, satyrs, fauns, harpies, griffins, with which
the fancy of the Mediterranean nations populated glen,
grotto, mountain and stream, are probably outnumbered
by the less beautiful and even hideous mind-shadows
of the Turanian world. Chief among these are
what in Chinese literature, so slavishly borrowed by
the Japanese, are called the four supernatural or
spiritually endowed creatures-the Kirin
or Unicorn, the Phoenix, the Tortoise and the Dragon.
Mythical Zooelogy.
Of the first species the ki
is the male, the lin is the female, hence the
name Kilin. The Japanese having no l, pronounce
this Kirin. Its appearance on the earth is regarded
as a happy portent of the advent of good government
or the birth of men who are to prove virtuous rulers.
It has the body of a deer, the tail of an ox, and a
single, soft horn. As messenger of mercy and
benevolence, the Kirin never treads on a live insect
or eats growing grass. Later philosophy made this
imaginary beast the incarnation of those five primordial
elements-earth, air, water, fire and ether
of which all things, including man’s body, are
made and which are symbolized in the shapes of the
cube, globe, pyramid, saucer and tuft of rays in the
Japanese gravestones. It is said to attain the
age of a thousand years, to be the noblest form of
the animal creation and the emblem of perfect good.
In Chinese and Japanese art this creature holds a
prominent place, and in literature even more so.
It is not only part of the repertoire of the artist’s
symbols in the Chinese world of ideas, but is almost
a necessity to the moulds of thought in eastern Asia.
Yet it is older than Confucius or the book-religions,
and its conception shows one of the nobler sides of
Animism.
The Feng-hwang or Phoenix, Japanese
Ho-wo, the second of the incarnations of the
spirits, is of wondrous form and mystic nature.
The rare advent of this bird upon the earth is, like
that of the kirin or unicorn, a presage of the advent
of virtuous rulers and good government. It has
the head of a pheasant, the beak of a swallow, the
neck of a tortoise, and the features of the dragon
and fish. Its colors and streaming feathers are
gorgeous with iridian sheen, combining the splendors
of the pheasant and the peacock. Its five colors
symbolize the cardinal virtues of uprightness of mind,
obedience, justice, fidelity and benevolence.
The male bird Ho, and female wo,
by their inseparable fellowship furnish the artist,
poet and literary writer with the originals of the
ten thousand references which are found in Chinese
and its derived literatures. Of this mystic Phoenix
a Chinese dictionary thus gives description:
The Phoenix is of the essence of water;
it was born in the vermilion cave; it perches
not but on the most beautiful of all trees; it
eats not but of the seed of the bamboo; its body is
adorned with the five colors; its song contains
the five notes; as it walks it looks around; as
it flies hosts of birds follow it.
Older than the elaborate descriptions
of it and its representations in art, the Ho-wo
is one of the creations of primitive Chinese Animism.
The Kwei or Tortoise is not the actual
horny reptile known to naturalists and to common experience,
but a spirit, an animated creature that ages ago rose
up out of the Yellow River, having on its carapace
the mystic writing out of which the legendary founder
of Chinese civilization deciphered the basis of moral
teachings and the secrets of the unseen. From
this divine tortoise which conceived by thought alone,
all other tortoises sprang. In the elaboration
of the myths and legends concerning the tortoise we
find many varieties of this scaly incarnation.
It lives a thousand years, hence it is emblem of longevity
in art and literature. It is the attendant of
the god of the waters. It has some of the qualities
and energies of the dragon, it has the power of transformation.
In pictures and sculptures we are familiar with its
figure, often of colossal size, as forming the curb
of a well, the base of a monument or tablet.
Yet, whatever its form in literature or art, it is
the later elaborated representation of ancient Animism
which selected the tortoise as one of the manifold
incarnations or media of the myriad spirits that populate
the air.
Chief and leader of the four divinely
constituted beasts is the Lung, Japanese Rio, or
Dragon, which has the power of transformation and of
making itself visible or invisible. At will it
reduces itself to the size of a silk-worm, or is swollen
until it fills the space of heaven and earth.
This is the creature especially preeminent in art,
literature and rhetoric. There are nine kinds
of dragons, all with various features and functions,
and artists and authors revel in their representation.
The celestial dragon guards the mansions of the gods
and supports them lest they fall; the spiritual dragon
causes the winds to blow and rain to descend for the
service of mankind; the earth dragon marks out the
courses of rivers and streams; the dragon of the hidden
treasures watches over the wealth concealed from mortals,
etc. Outwardly, the dragon of superstition
resembles the geological monsters brought to resurrection
by our paleontologists. He seems to incarnate
all the attributes and forces of animal life-vigor,
rapidity of motion, endurance, power of offence in
horn, hoof, claw, tooth, nail, scale and fiery breath.
Being the embodiment of all force the dragon is especially
symbolical of the emperor. Usually associated
with malevolence, one sees, besides the conventional
art and literature of civilization, the primitive
animistic idea of men to whose mind this mysterious
universe had no unity, who believed in myriad discordant
spirits but knew not of “one Law-giver, who
is able both to save and to destroy.” An
enlargement, possibly, of prehistoric man’s reminiscence
of now extinct monsters, the dragon is, in its artistic
development, a mythical embodiment of all the powers
of moisture to bless and to harm. We shall see
how, when Buddhism entered China, the cobra-de-capello,
so often figured in the Buddhistic representations
of India, is replaced by the dragon.
Yet besides these four incarnations
of the spirits that misrule the world there is a host,
a menagerie of mythical monsters. In Korea, one
of the Asian countries richest in demonology, beast
worship is very prevalent. Mythical winged tigers
and flying serpents with attributes of fire, lightning
and combinations of forces not found in any one creature,
are common to the popular fancy. In Japan, the
kappa, half monkey half tortoise, which seizes
children bathing in the rivers, as real to millions
of the native common folk as is the shark or porpoise;
the flying-weasel, that moves in the whirlwind with
sickle-like blades on his claws, which cut the face
of the unfortunate; the wind-god or imp that lets
loose the gale or storm; the thunder-imp or hairy,
cat-like creature that on the cloud-edges beats his
drums in crash, roll, or rattle; the earthquake-fish
or subterranean bull-head or cat-fish that wriggles
and writhes, causing the earth to shiver, shudder and
open; the ja or dragon centipede; the tengu
or long-nosed and winged mountain sprite, which acts
as the messenger of the gods, pulling out the tongues
of fibbing, lying children; besides the colossal spiders
and mythical creatures of the old story-books; the
foxes, badgers, cats and other creatures which transform
themselves and “possess” human beings,
still influence the popular mind. These, once
the old kami of the primitive Japanese, or
kamui of the aboriginal Aino, show the mental
soil and climate which were to condition the growth
of the seed imported from other lands, whether of
Buddhism or Christianity. It is very hard to
kill a god while the old mind that grew and nourished
him still remains the same. Banish or brand a
phantom or mind-shadow once worshipped as divine,
and it will appear as a fairy, a demon, a mythical
animal, or an oni; but to annihilate it requires
many centuries of higher culture.
As with the superstitions and survival
of Animism and Fetichism from our pagan ancestors
among ourselves, many of the lingering beliefs may
be harmless, but over the mass of men in Japan and
in Chinese Asia they still exert a baleful influence.
They make life full of distress; they curtail human
joy; they are a hindrance, to spiritual progress and
to civilization.
Fetichism.
The animistic tendency in that part
of Asia dominated by the Chinese world of ideas shows
itself not only in a belief in messengers or embodiments
of divine malevolence or benevolence, but also in the
location of the spiritual influence in or upon an inanimate
object or fetich. Among men in Chinese Asia,
from the clodhopper to the gentleman, the inheritance
of Fetichism from the primeval ages is constantly
noticeable. Let us glance at the term itself.
As the Chinaman’s “Joss”
is only his own pronunciation of the Portuguese word
Deos, or the Latin Deus, so the word
“fetich” is but the Portuguese modification
of the Latin word facticius, that is feitico.
Portugal, beginning nearly five hundred years ago,
had the honor of sending the first ships and crews
to explore the coasts of Africa and Asia, and her
sailors by this word, now Englished as fetich, described
the native charms or talismans. The word
“fetichism” came into the European languages
through the work of Charles de Brosses, who, in 1760,
wrote on “Du Culte des Dieux Fétiches.”
In Fetichism, the “object is treated as having
personal consciousness and power, is talked with,
worshipped, prayed to, sacrificed to, petted or ill-treated
with reference to its past or future behavior to its
votaries.”
Let me draw a picture from actual
observation. I look out of the windows of my
house in Fukui. Here is a peasant who comes back
after the winter to prepare his field for cultivation.
The man’s horizon of ideas, like his vocabulary,
is very limited. His view of actual life is bounded
by a few rice-fields, a range of hills, and the village
near by. Possibly one visit to a city or large
town has enriched his experience. More probably,
however, the wind and clouds, the weather, the soil,
crops and taxes, his family and food and how to provide
for them, are the main thoughts that occupy his mind.
Before he will strike mattock or spade in the soil,
lay axe to a tree, collect or burn underbrush, he will
select a stone, a slab of rock or a stick of wood,
set it upon hill side or mud field-boundary, and to
this he will bow, prostrate himself or pray. To
him, this stone or stick is consecrated. It has
power to placate the spirits and ward off their evil.
It is the medium of communication between him and
them. Now, having attended, as he thinks, to the
proprieties in the case, he proceeds to dig, plough,
drain, put in order and treat soil or water, tree
or other growth as is most convenient for his purpose.
His fetich is erected to “the honorable spirits.”
Were this not attended to, some known or unknown bad
luck, sinister fortune, or calamity would befall him.
Here, then, is a fetich-worshipper. The stick
or stone is the medium of communication between the
man and the spirits who can bless or harm him, and
which to his mind are as countlessly numerous as the
swarms of mosquitoes which he drives out of and away
from his summer cottage by smudge fires in August.
One need not travel in Yezo or Saghalin
to see practical Fetichism. Go where you will
in Japan, there are fetich worshippers. Among
the country folk, the “inaka” of
Japanese parlance, Fetichism is seen in its grossest
forms. Yet among probably millions of Buddhists,
especially of certain sects, the Nichiren for example,
and even among the rationalistic Confucians, there
are fetich-worshippers. Rare is the Japanese
farmer, laborer, mechanic, ward-man, or hei-min
of any trade who does not wear amulet, charm or other
object which he regards with more or less of reverence
as having relation to the powers that help or harm.
In most of the Buddhist temples these amulets are sold
for the benefit of the priests or of the shrine or
monastery. Not a few even of the gentry consider
it best to be on the safe side and wear in pouch or
purse these protectors against evil.
Of the 7,817,570 houses in the empire,
enumerated in the census of 1892, it is probable that
seven millions of them are subjects of insurance by
fetich. They are guaranteed against fire, thieves,
lightning, plague and pestilence. It is because
of money paid to the priests that the wooden policies
are duly nailed on the walls, and not on account of
the wise application of mathematical, financial or
medical science. Examine also the paper packages
carefully tied and affixed above the transom, decipher
the writing in ink or the brand left by the hot iron
on the little slabs of pine-wood-there
may be one or a score of them-and what
will you read? Names of the temples with date
of issue and seal of certificate from the priests,
mottoes or titles from sacred books, often only a
Sanskrit letter or monogram, of which the priest-pedler
may long since have forgotten the meaning. To
build a house, select a cemetery or proceed to any
of the ordinary events of life without making use of
some sort of material fetich, is unusual, extraordinary
and is voted heterodox.
Long after the brutish stage of thought
is past the fetichistic instinct remains in the sacredness
attached to the mere letter or paper or parchment
of the sacred book or writing, when used as amulet,
plaster or medicine. The survivals, even in Buddhism,
of ancient and prehistoric Fetichism are many and
often with undenied approval of the religious authorities,
especially in those sects which are themselves reversions
to primitive and lower types of religion.
Among the Ainos of Yezo and Saghalin
the medicine-man or shaman is decorated with fetichistic
bric-a-brac of all sorts, and these bits of shells,
metals, and other clinking substances are believed
to be media of communication with mysterious influences
and forces. In Korea thousands of trees bedecked
with fluttering rags, clinking scraps of tin, metal
or stone signify the same thing. In Japan these
primitive tinkling scraps and clinking bunches of
glass have long since become the suzu or wind-bells
seen on the pagoda which tintinabulate with every
passing breeze. The whittled sticks of the Aino,
non-conductors of evil and protectors of those who
make and rear them, stuck up in every place of awe
or supposed danger, have in the slow evolution of centuries
become the innumerable flag-poles, banners and streamers
which one sees at their matsuris or temple
festivals. Millions of towels and handkerchiefs
still flutter over wells and on sacred trees.
In old Japan the banners of an army almost outnumbered
the men who fought beneath them. Today, at times
they nearly conceal the temples from view.
The civilized Japanese, having passed
far beyond the Aino’s stage of religion, still
show their fetichistic instincts in the veneration
accorded to priestly inventions for raising revenue.
This instinct lingers in the faith accorded to medicine
in the form of decoction, pill, bolus or poultice
made from the sacred writing and piously swallowed;
in the reverence paid to the idol for its own sake,
and in the charm or amulet worn by the soldier in
his cap or by the gentleman in his pill-box, tobacco-pouch
or purse.
As the will of the worshipper who
selects the fetich makes it what it is, so also, by
the exercise of that will he imagines he can in a
certain measure be the equal or superior of his god.
Like the Italian peasant who beats or scolds his bambino
when his prayers are not answered or his wishes gratified,
so the fetich is punished or not allowed to know what
is going on, by being covered up or hidden away.
Instances of such rough handling of their fétiches
by the people are far from unknown in the Land of
Great Peace. At such childishness we may wonder
and imagine that fetich-worship is the very antipodes
of religion; and yet it requires but little study
of the lower orders of mind and conduct in Christendom
to see how fetich-worship still lingers among people
called Christians, whether the fetich be the image
of a saint or the Virgin, or a verse of the Bible
found at random and used much as is a penny-toss to
decide minor actions. Or, to look farther south,
what means the rabbit’s foot carried in the pocket
or the various articles of faith now hanging in the
limbo between religion and folk-lore in various parts
of our own country?
Phallicism.
Further illustrations of far Eastern
Animism and Fetichism are seen in forms once vastly
more prevalent in Japan than now. Indeed, so far
improved off the face of the earth are they, that some
are already matters of memory or archaeology, and
their very existence even in former days is nearly
or wholly incredible to the generation born since
1868-when Old Japan began to vanish in dissolving
views and New Japan to emerge. What the author
has seen with his own eyes, would amaze many Japanese
born since 1868 and the readers of the rhapsodies
of tourists who study Japan from the jin-riki-sha.
Phases of tree and serpent worship are still quite
common, and will be probably for generations to come;
but the phallic shrines and emblems abolished by the
government in 1872 have been so far invisible to most
living travellers and natives, that their once general
existence and use are now scarcely suspected.
Even profound scholars of the Japanese language and
literature whose work dates from after the year 1872
have scarcely suspected the universality of phallic
worship. Yet what we could say of this cult and
its emblems, especially in treating of Shinto, the
special ethnic faith of Japan, would be from sight
of our own eyes besides the testimony of many witnesses.
The cultus has been known in
the Japanese archipelago from Riu Kin to Yezo.
Despite official edicts of abolition it is still secretly
practised by the “heathen,” the inaka
of Japan. “Government law lasts three days,”
is an ancient proverb in Nippon. Sharp eyes have,
within three months of the writing of this line, unearthed
a phallic shrine within a stone’s-throw of Shinto’s
most sacred temples at Ise. Formerly, however,
these implements of worship were seen numerously-in
the cornucopia distributed in the temples, in the matsuris
or religious processions and in representation by
various plastic material-and all this until
1872, to an extent that is absolutely incredible to
all except the eye-witnesses, some of whose written
testimonies we possess. What seems to our mind
shocking and revolting was once a part of our own
ancestors’ faith, and until very recently was
the perfectly natural and innocent creed of many millions
of Japanese and is yet the same for tens of thousands
of them.
We may easily see why and how that
which to us is a degrading cult was not only closely
allied to Shinto, but directly fostered by and
properly a part of it, as soon as we read the account
of the creation of the world, an contained in the
national “Book of Ancient Traditions,”
the “Kojiki.” Several of the opening
paragraphs of this sacred book of Shinto are phallic
myths explaining cosmogony. Yet the myths and
the cult are older than the writing and are phases
of primitive Japanese faith. The mystery of fatherhood
is to the primitive man the mystery of creation also.
To him neither the thought nor the word was at hand
to put difference and transcendental separation between
him and what he worshipped as a god.
Into the details of the former display
and carriage of these now obscene symbols in the popular
celebrations; of the behavior of even respectable
citizens during the excitement and frenzy of the festivals;
of their presence in the wayside shrines; of the philosophy,
hideousness or pathos of the subject, we cannot here
enter. We simply call attention to their existence,
and to a form of thought, if not of religion, properly
so-called, which has survived all imported systems
of faith and which shows what the native or indigenous
idea of divinity really is-an idea that
profoundly affects the organization of society.
To the enlightened Buddhist, Confucian, and even the
modern Shintoist the phallus-worshipper is a “heathen,”
a “pagan,” and yet he still practises
his faith and rites. It is for us to hint at the
powerful influence such persistent ideas have upon
Japanese morals and civilization. Still further,
we illustrate the basic fact which all foreign religions
and all missionaries, Confucian, Buddhist, Mahometan
or Christian must deal with, viz.: That
the Eastern Asiatic mind runs to pantheism as surely
as the body of flesh and blood seeks food.
Tree and Serpent Worship.
In prehistoric and medieval Japan,
as among the Ainos to-day, trees and serpents as well
as rocks, rivers and other inanimate objects were
worshipped, because such of them as were supposed for
reasons known and felt to be awe-inspiring or wonderful
were “kami,” that is, above the common,
wonderful. This word kami is usually translated
god or deity, but the term does not conform to our
ideas, by a great gulf of difference. It is more
than probable that the Japanese term kami is the same
as the Aino word kamui, and that the despised
and conquered aboriginal savage has furnished the
mould of the ordinary Japanese idea of god-which
even to-day with them means anything wonderful or
extraordinary. From the days before history the
people have worshipped trees, and do so yet, considering
them as the abodes of and as means of communication
with supernatural powers. On them the people
hang their votive offerings, twist on the branches
their prayers written on paper, avoid cutting down,
breaking or in any way injuring certain trees.
The sakaki tree is especially sacred, even to
this day, in funeral or Shinto services. To
wound or defile a tree sacred to a particular god
was to call forth the vengeance of the insulted deity
upon the insulter, or as the hearer of prayer upon
another to whom guilt was imputed and punishment was
due.
Thus, in the days older than this
present generation, but still within this century,
as the writer has witnessed, it was the custom of women
betrayed by their lovers to perform the religious act
of vengeance called Ushi toki mairi, or going
to the temple at the hour of the ox, that is at 2
A.M. First making an image or manikin of straw,
she set out on her errand of revenge, with nails held
in her mouth and with hammer in one hand and straw
figure in the other, sometimes also having on her
head a reversed tripod in which were stuck three lighted
candles. Arriving at the shrine she selected
a tree dedicated to a god, and then nailed the straw
simulacrum of her betrayer to the trunk, invoking the
kami to curse and annihilate the destroyer of her peace.
She adjures the god to save his tree, impute the guilt
of desecration to the traitor and visit him with deadly
vengeance. The visit is repeated and nails are
driven until the object of the incantation sickens
and dies, or is at least supposed to do so. I
have more than once seen such trees and straw images
upon them, and have observed others in which the large
number of rusted nails and fragments of straw showed
how tenaciously the superstition lingered.
In instances more pleasant to witness,
may be seen trees festooned with the symbolical rice-straw
in cords and fringes. With these the people honor
the trees as the abode of the kami, or as evidence
of their faith in the renown accredited in the past.
In common with most human beings the
Japanese consider the serpent an object of mystery
and awe, but most of them go further and pay the ophidian
a reverence and awe which is worship. Their oldest
literature shows how large a part the serpent played
in the so-called divine age, how it acted as progenitress
of the Mikado’s ancestry, and how it afforded
means of incarnation for the kami or gods. Ten
species of ophidia are known in the Japanese islands,
but in the larger number of more or less imaginary
varieties which figure in the ancient books we shall
find plenty of material for fetich-worship. In
perusing the “Kojiki” one scarcely knows,
when he begins a story, whether the character which
to all appearance is a man or woman is to end as a
snake, or whether the mother after delivering her child
will or will not glide into the marsh or slide away
into the sea, leaving behind a trail of slime.
A dragon is three-fourths serpent, and both the dragon
and the serpent are prominent figures, perhaps the
most prominent of the kami or gods in human or animal
form in the “Kojiki” and other early legends
of the gods, though the crocodile, crow, deer, dog,
and other animals are kami. It is therefore no
wonder that serpents have been and are still worshipped
by the people, that some of their gods and goddesses
are liable at any time to slip away in scaly form,
that famous temples are built on sites noted as being
the abode or visible place of the actual water or
land snake of natural history, and that the spot where
a serpent is seen to-day is usually marked with a
sacred emblem or a shrine. We shall see how this
snake-worship became not only a part of Shinto
but even a notable feature in corrupt Buddhism.
Pantheism’s Destruction of Boundaries.
In its rudest forms, this pantheism
branches out into animism or shamanism, fetichism
and phallicism. In its higher forms, it becomes
polytheism, idolatry and defective philosophy.
Having centuries ago corrupted Buddhism it is the
malaria which, unseen and unfelt, is ready to poison
and corrupt Christianity. Indeed, it has already
given over to disease and spiritual death more than
one once hopeful Christian believer, teacher and preacher
in the Japan of our decade.
To assault and remove the incubus,
to replace and refill the mind, to lift up and enlighten
the Japanese peasant, science as already known and
faith in one God, Creator and Father of all things,
must go hand in hand. Education and civilization
will do much for the ignorant inaka or boors,
but for the cultured whose minds waver and whose feet
flounder, as well as for the unlearned and priest-ridden,
there is no surer help and healing than that faith
in the Heavenly Father which gives the unifying thought
to him who looks into creation.
Keep the boundary line clear between
God and his world and all is order and discrimination.
Obliterate that boundary and all is pathless morass,
black chaos and on the mind the phantasms which belong
to the victim of delirium tremens.
There is one Lawgiver. In the
beginning, God. In the end, God, all in all.