“I am a man and nothing human
do I consider alien to me,” said Terence two
thousand years ago.
A man who thoroughly knows the world
must be capable of understanding all phases of life,-not
only those of his own country, class, profession,
or sect. It is the humanity in all its phases
that he loves and understands,-not the
phase itself; and therefore nothing that is human
can be so remote as to be unintelligible to his mind
or without the power of appeal to his heart. Iago could never understand honesty or generosity.
Don Juan could never understand chastity. On the
other hand it is possible for an honest man to understand
Iago, and for a clean man to understand Don Juan.
Although in neither case will the man who understands
sympathize with the sin, in both cases the understanding
will be clear and comprehensive. A child cannot
understand either Iago or Don Juan, neither can a
childish man; but a truly childlike man can
understand all phases of temptation and sin, and estimate
them justly.
There is an innocence of ignorance,
and there is an innocence of wisdom. The innocence
of ignorance is involuntary. It is innocence because
it cannot be anything else. A little child is
in the innocence of ignorance, and it is from that
protective innocence that we feel the fresh, happy
atmosphere of childhood. The innocence of wisdom
is possible only to those who have known temptation
and, through overcoming it, have learned to recognize
all sin for what it really is,-the filth
and disease of the soul, and to avoid it as such.
The fresh life that springs from such struggle and
conquest of selfish tendencies brings with it a vigor
of innocence which has a quality of life akin to that
of a healthy child, with the added power and insight
of a man’s maturity. Whatever form or phase
of temptation his fellow men may be in, such a man,
from his own experience, has found the means of understanding
them. He has found the means of understanding
his neighbor, whether the neighbor is immersed in
self-indulgence, is struggling desperately to gain
his freedom, or is well along upon the upward path.
A man who can only understand certain
special phases of human nature is narrow and provincial,
however he may assume the air of a man of the world;
and the false assumption of a broad understanding renders
him practically still more narrow and provincial,
for it stands in the way of his learning from those
who have it in their power to instruct him. But
the true man of the world, whose breadth of vision
and penetration of insight are the result of a working
familiarity with universal principles in practical
life, detests sin without condemning the sinner, and
is not befooled by the shallow pretensions of the provincial
Pharisee.
To know the world we must not only
be able to understand all phases of it in general,
but we must also understand the various types in particular.
There are nations, there are grades and phases of life
in each nation, and there are individuals in each
phase. There is as great a difference between
the individuals of a small community of people, if
one has the eye to detect it, as there is between nations.
I remember once talking with a famous
anthropologist. All men were to him simply representations
of ages, nations, or families. No man was a man
in himself; he was simply a specimen. It gave
to a little everyday person a very keen sense of the
vastness of humanity in general, past and present,
to hear this scientific man talk. He had the habit
of swinging all the nations of the world into his
conversation as easily as if he lived with them every
day, as in his habitual thought he truly did.
Whenever I would speak to him of a friend or a relative
he would characterize him by his national and family
tendency. To talk with the Professor for an hour
or two was most enlightening and expanding; but a
long acquaintance proved that a man, even in the region
of large anthropological and geographical ideas, could
be just as narrow and provincial as the self-appointed
moral censor of a country town. The human body
and the human mind, in general, seemed to mean a very
great deal to him, but man as an individual soul meant
nothing at all.
Some of the greatest diplomats, who
have stood out as clever in their dealings with nations,
have been limited in the extreme when their lives
took them outside of the rut of their own immediate
work. Statesmen who have dealt cleverly with
nations have blundered sadly in their dealings with
individual men, blundered sometimes when their mistakes
would react upon their national influence. And
yet so established were they in the selfish rut of
their national diplomacy, so provincial were they in
the knowledge of individual human nature, that they
went on blundering, until many a time their mistakes
led them almost, if not quite, to national disaster.
The best lawyers know that to do their work truly
they must be able to judge particular cases and special
circumstances by standards which to the majority of
minds do not exist. For want of such clear understanding
of human nature which comes from an original instinct
for truth itself,-as distinguished from
the cut-and-dried application of conventional habit,-lawyers
have often failed.
Conventional standards are the common
standards of the majority; but, although they are
perhaps more serviceable than any others in the achievement
of commonplace success, they are invariably inadequate
on a really high and simple plane of human endeavor.
It is rare to find an active man engaged in worldly
business who recognizes the laws of simple unselfishness
and truth as having any practical existence in human
affairs; but it is still more rare to find such a man
understanding the true relation between essential goodness
and the conventional principles of morality.
There are times when those who act from higher standards
must appear to contradict entirely all conventional
modes of life, but they do not necessarily oppose such
conventions, for through a courageous adherence to
the spirit of the law they eventually bring new life
to its letter. The true man of the world is he
who can express his essential goodness and truth in
wise and appropriate ways, and in terms which must
be, in the long run, intelligible to all kinds of
men.
When Jesus Christ healed a man on
the Sabbath day, He not only ignored the conventional
standards of His nation, but He appeared to disobey
one of the fundamental commandments of the law.
The Pharisees, and all the people about Him who stood
well in the eyes of the world, were angrily indignant.
It is not difficult to imagine, after it was all over,
a kind and conventional soul coming to the Lord and
asking Him why He had not waited until the next day
before carrying out His intention;-He would
not have had to wait long, and the displeasure of the
Pharisees would have been avoided. “Would
it not have been more charitable to respect the religious
scruples of the Jews? Is it not wrong to fly needlessly
in the face of respectable public opinion? Was
it not unwise needlessly to break the letter of the
commandment, even while keeping its spirit?”
Some doubting soul, who wanted to believe in the goodness
of the Lord and the purity of His motive, might well
have put all these questions to Him with a sincere
and conscientious desire to serve. And yet this
doubter, with all his conscientious kindness, would
have been blind and stupid. For only the self-righteous
or the morally stupid could fail to understand that,
in healing a sick man on the Sabbath day, our Lord
was establishing a new precedent of a truer and deeper
obedience for all mankind. The Pharisees were
convinced of their own goodness; it would not have
occurred to them as possible that they were narrow,
provincial, and self-righteous. They would not
have admitted for an instant the possibility of any
circumstances under which it might be right to perform
a radical cure on the Sabbath day; and they persuaded
themselves that they were “doing God service”
when they subjected to an ignominious execution the
man who had so roused all their personal and selfish
antagonism. The Pharisees were hopelessly unable
to understand Him, but that was because of their own
blindness. In laying down the principle that
the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath,
our Lord was expressing an eternal truth, not only
to the world of His own time but to the world of all
ages.
To associate the idea of a man of
the world with a knowledge of its dark places and
shallow forms alone, tends to belittle and degrade
our conception of the world; whereas the world, so
far from being only dark or shallow, is well worth
knowing and serving, provided it is made to serve,
in its turn, all that is vigorous and wholesome in
man. We should recognize the beauty and power
of the things of this world as servants to our highest
law; it is only the perversion of those things that
is to be renounced.
The true man of the world understands
perverted human nature,-from the gourmand
to the keen political sharper; he is a man who is never
deceived by appearances, and who sees the real character
beneath its external polish; a man who, with his clearer
understanding, takes each perversion at its true value,
understands the Iagos and the Don Juans equally well,
with no slightest taste for either. They are all
forms of disease to him. He can trace Iago’s
villainy to its own destruction and Don Juan’s
sensuality to its worse than satiety.
Again, a true man of the world is
a man who knows, and loves, and is a part of all the
wholesomeness in the world; a man who is quickly at
home in every variety of good form, because the instincts
of a gentleman are the same all the world over, although
customs may differ entirely; a man who, while accustomed
to all conventions and respecting them where they
properly belong, is easily and happily at home without
them; a man who, while preferring fine instincts as
well as strong characters in his fellow men, is so
alive to the best in human nature that he can find
the gold thread anywhere in the wax, if there is a
gold thread there; a man whose thoughts are so much
at home in fresh air that he at once detects a close
or tainted atmosphere, but can keep the unpleasant
sensation to himself; who never intrudes his love
of fresh air upon others, but, being surrounded by
it himself, enjoys it habitually and as a matter of
course. Such a man can never be caught unawares;
he is a gentleman in all emergencies, because he cannot
be otherwise than himself, and he never appears what
he is not.
A true man of the world is not of
the world primarily, although he serves the world
and is served by it; it is to him always a means to
a higher end,-never an end in itself.
It was of true men of the world that the Lord spoke
when He said, “I pray not that Thou shouldest
take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest
keep them from the evil!”