I have lately come to perceive that the one thing which gives value to any piece of art, whether it be book, or picture, or music, is that subtle and evasive thing which is called personality.  No amount of labour, of zest, even of accomplishment, can make up for the absence of this quality.  It must be an almost wholly instinctive thing, I believe.  Of course, the mere presence of personality in a work of art is not sufficient, because the personality revealed may be lacking in charm; and charm, again, is an instinctive thing.  No artist can set out to capture charm; he will toil all the night and take nothing; but what every artist can and must aim at, is to have a perfectly sincere point of view.  He must take his chance as to whether his point of view is an attractive one; but sincerity is the one indispensable thing.  It is useless to take opinions on trust, to retail them, to adopt them; they must be formed, created, truly felt.  The work of a sincere artist is almost certain to have some value; the work of an insincere artist is of its very nature worthless.

I mean to try, in the pages that follow, to be as sincere as I can.  It is not an easy task, though it may seem so; for it means a certain disentangling of the things that one has perceived and felt for oneself from the prejudices and preferences that have been inherited, or stuck like burrs upon the soul by education and circumstance.

It may be asked why I should thus obtrude my point of view in print; why I should not keep my precious experience to myself; what the value of it is to other people.  Well, the answer to that is that it helps our sense of balance and proportion to know how other people are looking at life, what they expect from it, what they find in it, and what they do not find.  I have myself an intense curiosity about other people’s point of view, what they do when they are alone, and what they think about.  Edward FitzGerald said that he wished we had more biographies of obscure persons.  How often have I myself wished to ask simple, silent, deferential people, such as station-masters, butlers, gardeners, what they make of it all!  Yet one cannot do it, and even if one could, ten to one they would not or could not tell you.  But here is going to be a sedate confession.  I am going to take the world into my confidence, and say, if I can, what I think and feel about the little bit of experience which I call my life, which seems to me such a strange and often so bewildering a thing.

Let me speak, then, plainly of what that life has been, and tell what my point of view is.  I was brought up on ordinary English lines.  My father, in a busy life, held a series of what may be called high official positions.  He was an idealist, who, owing to a vigorous power of practical organization and a mastery of detail, was essentially a man of affairs.  Yet he contrived to be a student too.  Thus, owing to the fact that he often shifted his headquarters, I have seen a good deal of general society in several parts of England.  Moreover, I was brought up in a distinctly intellectual atmosphere.

I was at a big public school, and gained a scholarship at the University.  I was a moderate scholar and a competent athlete; but I will add that I had always a strong literary bent.  I took in younger days little interest in history or polities, and tended rather to live an inner life in the region of friendship and the artistic emotions.  If I had been possessed of private means, I should, no doubt, have become a full-fledged dilettante.  But that doubtful privilege was denied me, and for a good many years I lived a busy and fairly successful life as a master at a big public school.  I will not dwell upon this, but I will say that I gained a great interest in the science of education, and acquired profound misgivings as to the nature of the intellectual process known by the name of secondary education.  More and more I began to perceive that it is conducted on diffuse, detailed, unbusiness-like lines.  I tried my best, as far as it was consistent with loyalty to an established system, to correct the faulty bias.  But it was with a profound relief that I found myself suddenly provided with a literary task of deep interest, and enabled to quit my scholastic labours.  At the same time, I am deeply grateful for the practical experience I was enabled to gain, and even more for the many true and pleasant friendships with colleagues, parents, and boys that I was allowed to form.

What a waste of mental energy it is to be careful and troubled about one’s path in life!  Quite unexpectedly, at this juncture, came my election to a college Fellowship, giving me the one life that I had always eagerly desired, and the possibility of which had always seemed closed to me.

I became then a member of a small and definite society, with a few prescribed duties, just enough, so to speak, to form a hem to my life of comparative leisure.  I had acquired and kept, all through my life as a schoolmaster, the habit of continuous literary work; not from a sense of duty, but simply from instinctive pleasure.  I found myself at once at home in my small and beautiful college, rich with all kinds of ancient and venerable traditions, in buildings of humble and subtle grace.  The little dark-roofed chapel, where I have a stall of my own; the galleried hall, with its armorial glass; the low, book-lined library; the panelled combination-room, with its dim portraits of old worthies:  how sweet a setting for a quiet life!  Then, too, I have my own spacious rooms, with a peaceful outlook into a big close, half orchard, half garden, with bird-haunted thickets and immemorial trees, bounded by a slow river.

And then, to teach me how “to borrow life and not grow old,” the happy tide of fresh and vigorous life all about me, brisk, confident, cheerful young men, friendly, sensible, amenable, at that pleasant time when the world begins to open its rich pages of experience, undimmed at present by anxiety or care.

My college is one of the smallest in the University.  Last night in Hall I sate next a distinguished man, who is, moreover, very accessible and pleasant.  He unfolded to me his desires for the University.  He would like to amalgamate all the small colleges into groups, so as to have about half-a-dozen colleges in all.  He said, and evidently thought, that little colleges are woefully circumscribed and petty places; that most of the better men go to the two or three leading colleges, while the little establishments are like small backwaters out of the main stream.  They elect, he said, their own men to Fellowships; they resist improvements; much money is wasted in management, and the whole thing is minute and feeble.  I am afraid it is true in a way; but, on the other hand, I think that a large college has its defects too.  There is no real college spirit there; it is very nice for two or three sets.  But the different schools which supply a big college form each its own set there; and if a man goes there from a leading public school, he falls into his respective set, lives under the traditions and in the gossip of his old school, and gets to know hardly any one from other schools.  Then the men who come up from smaller places just form small inferior sets of their own, and really get very little good out of the place.  Big colleges keep up their prestige because the best men tend to go to them; but I think they do very little for the ordinary men who have fewer social advantages to start with.

The only cure, said my friend, for these smaller places is to throw their Fellowships open, and try to get public-spirited and liberal-minded Dons.  Then, he added, they ought to specialize in some one branch of University teaching, so that the men who belonged to a particular department would tend to go there.

Well, to-day was a wet day, so I did what I particularly enjoy - I went off for a slow stroll, and poked about among some of the smaller colleges.  I declare that the idea of tying them all together seemed to me to be a horrible piece of vandalism.  These sweet and gentle little places, with a quiet, dignified history and tradition of their own, are very attractive and beautiful.  I went and explored a little college I am ashamed to say I had never visited before.  It shows a poor plastered front to the street, but the old place is there behind the plaster.  I went into a tiny, dark chapel, with a high pillared pediment of carved wood behind the altar, a rich ceiling, and some fine columned alcoves where the dignitaries sit.  Out of the gallery opens a venerable library, with a regretful air of the past about its faded volumes in their high presses, as though it sadly said, “I am of yesterday.”  Then we found ourselves in a spacious panelled Hall, with a great oriel looking out into a peaceful garden, embowered in great trees, with smiling lawns.  All round the Hall hung portraits of old worthies - peers, judges, and bishops, with some rubicund wigged Masters.  I like to think of the obscure and yet dignified lives that have been lived in these quaint and stately chambers.  I suppose that there used to be a great deal of tippling and low gossip in the old days of the vinous, idle Fellows, who hung on for life, forgetting their books, and just trying to dissipate boredom.  One tends to think that it was all like that; and yet, doubtless, there were quiet lives of study and meditation led here by wise and simple men who have long since mouldered into dust.  And all that dull rioting is happily over.  The whole place is full of activity and happiness.  There is, if anything, among the Dons, too much business, too many meetings, too much teaching, and the life of mere study is neglected.  But it pleases me to think that even now there are men who live quietly among their books, unambitious, perhaps unproductive, but forgetting the flight of time, and looking out into a pleasant garden, with its rustling trees, among the sound of mellow bells.  We are, most of us, too much in a fuss nowadays to live these gentle, innocent, and beautiful lives; and yet the University is a place where a poor man, if he be virtuous, may lead a life of dignity and simplicity, and refined happiness.  We make the mistake of thinking that all can be done by precept, when, as a matter of fact, example is no less potent a force.  To make such quiet lives possible was to a great extent what these stately and beautiful places were founded for - that there should be in the busy world a corner where activities should not be so urgent, and where life should pass like an old dream, tinged with delicate colour and soft sound.  I declare I do not know that it is more virtuous to be a clerk in a bank, toiling day by day that others should be rich, than to live in thought and meditation, with a heart open to sweet influences and pure hopes.  And yet it seems to be held nowadays that virtue is bound up with practical life.  If a man is content to abjure wealth and to forego marriage, to live simply without luxuries, he may spend a very dignified, gentle life here, and at the same time he may be really useful.  It is a thing which is well worth doing to attempt the reconciliation between the old and the young.  Boys come up here under the impression that their pastors and teachers are all about fifty; they think of them as sensible, narrow-minded men, and, like Melchizedek, without beginning of days or end of life.  They suppose that they like marking mistakes in exercises with blue pencil, and take delight in showing their power by setting punishments.  It does not often occur to them that schoolmasters may be pathetically anxious to guide boys right, and to guard them from evil.  They think of them as devoid of passions and prejudices, with a little dreary space to traverse before they sink into the tomb.  Even in homes, how seldom does a perfectly simple human relation exist between a boy and his father!  There is often a great deal of affection on both sides, but little camaraderie.  Little boys are odd, tiresome creatures in many ways, with savage instincts; and I suppose many fathers feel that, if they are to maintain their authority, they must be a little distant and inscrutable.  A boy goes for sympathy and companionship to his mother and sisters, not often to his father.  Now a Don may do something to put this straight, if he has the will.  One of the best friends I ever had was an elderly Don at my own college, who had been a contemporary of my father’s.  He liked young men; and I used to consult him and ask his advice in things in which I could not well consult my own contemporaries.  It is not necessary to be extravagantly youthful, to slap people on the back, to run with the college boat, though that is very pleasant if it is done naturally.  All that is wanted is to be accessible and quietly genial.  And under such influences a young man may, without becoming elderly, get to understand the older point of view.

The difficulty is that one acquires habits and mannerisms; one is crusty and gruff if interfered with.  But, as Pater said, to acquire habits is failure in life.  Of course, one must realize limitations, and learn in what regions one can be effective.  But no one need be case-hardened, smoke-dried, angular.  The worst of a University is that one sees men lingering on because they must earn a living, and there is nothing else that they can do; but for a human-hearted, good-humoured, and sensible man, a college life is a life where it is easy and pleasant to practise benevolence and kindliness, and where a small investment of trouble pays a large percentage of happiness.  Indeed, surveying it impartially - as impartially as I can - such a life seems to hold within it perhaps the greatest possibilities of happiness that life can hold.  To have leisure and a degree of simple stateliness assured; to live in a wholesome dignity; to have the society of the young and generous; to have lively and intelligent talk; to have the choice of society and solitude alike; to have one’s working hours respected, and one’s leisure hours solaced - is not this better than to drift into the so-called tide of professional success, with its dreary hours of work, its conventional domestic background?  No doubt the domestic background has its interests, its delights; but one must pay a price for everything, and I am more than willing to pay the price of celibacy for my independence.

The elderly Don in college rooms, interested in Greek particles, grumbling over his port wine, is a figure beloved by writers of fiction as a contrast to all that is brave, and bright, and wholesome in life.  Could there be a more hopeless misconception?  I do not know a single extant example of the species at the University.  Personally, I have no love for Greek particles, and only a very moderate taste for port wine.  But I do love, with all my heart, the grace of antiquity that mellows our crumbling courts, the old tradition of multifarious humanity that has century by century entwined itself with the very fabric of the place.  I love the youthful spirit that flashes and brightens in every corner of the old courts, as the wallflower that rises spring by spring with its rich orange-tawny hue, its wild scent, on the tops of our mouldering walls.  It is a gracious and beautiful life for all who love peace and reflection, strength and youth.  It is not a life for fiery and dominant natures, eager to conquer, keen to impress; but it is a life for any one who believes that the best rewards are not the brightest, who is willing humbly to lend a cheerful hand, to listen as well as to speak.  It is a life for any one who has found that there is a world of tender, wistful, delicate emotions, subdued and soft impressions, in which it is peace to live; for one who has learned, however dimly, that wise and faithful love, quiet and patient hope, are the bread by which the spirit is nourished - that religion is not an intellectual or even an ecclesiastical thing, but a far-off and remote vision of the soul.

I know well the thoughts and hopes that I should desire to speak; but they are evasive, subtle things, and too often, like shy birds, will hardly let you approach them.  But I would add that life has not been for me a dreamy thing, lived in soft fantastic reveries; indeed, it has been far the reverse.  I have practised activity, I have mixed much with my fellows; I have taught, worked, organized, directed.  I have watched men and boys; I have found infinite food for mirth, for interest, and even for grief.  But I have grown to feel that the ambitions which we preach and the successes for which we prepare are very often nothing but a missing of the simple road, a troubled wandering among thorny by-paths and dark mountains.  I have grown to believe that the one thing worth aiming at is simplicity of heart and life; that one’s relations with others should be direct and not diplomatic; that power leaves a bitter taste in the mouth; that meanness, and hardness, and coldness are the unforgivable sins; that conventionality is the mother of dreariness; that pleasure exists not in virtue of material conditions, but in the joyful heart; that the world is a very interesting and beautiful place; that congenial labour is the secret of happiness; and many other things which seem, as I write them down, to be dull and trite commonplaces, but are for me the bright jewels which I have found beside the way.

It is, then, from College Windows that I look forth.  But even so, though on the one hand I look upon the green and sheltered garden, with its air of secluded recollection and repose, a place of quiet pacing to and fro, of sober and joyful musing; yet on another side I see the court, with all its fresh and shifting life, its swift interchange of study and activity; and on yet another side I can observe the street where the infinite pageant of humanity goes to and fro, a tide full of sound and foam, of business and laughter, and of sorrow too, and sickness, and the funeral pomp of death.

This, then, is my point of view.  I can truthfully say that it is not gloomy, and equally that it is not uproarious.  I can boast of no deep philosophy, for I feel, like Dr. Johnson’s simple friend Edwards, that “I have tried, too, in my time, to be a philosopher, but - I don’t know how - cheerfulness was always breaking in.”  Neither is it the point of view of a profound and erudite student, with a deep belief in the efficacy of useless knowledge.  Neither am I a humorist, for I have loved beauty better than laughter; nor a sentimentalist, for I have abhorred a weak dalliance with personal emotions.  It is hard, then, to say what I am; but it is my hope that this may emerge.  My desire is but to converse with my readers, to speak as in a comfortable tete-a-tete, of experience, and hope, and patience.  I have no wish to disguise the hard and ugly things of life; they are there, whether one disguises them or not; but I think that unless one is a professed psychologist or statistician, one gets little good by dwelling upon them.  I have always believed that it is better to stimulate than to correct, to fortify rather than to punish, to help rather than to blame.  If there is one attitude that I fear and hate more than another it is the attitude of the cynic.  I believe with all my soul in romance:  that is, in a certain high-hearted, eager dealing with life.  I think that one ought to expect to find things beautiful and people interesting, not to take delight in detecting meannesses and failures.  And there is yet another class of temperament for which I have a deep detestation.  I mean the assured, the positive, the Pharisaical temper, that believes itself to be impregnably in the right and its opponents indubitably in the wrong; the people who deal in axioms and certainties, who think that compromise is weak and originality vulgar.  I detest authority in every form; I am a sincere republican.  In literature, in art, in life, I think that the only conclusions worth coming to are one’s own conclusions.  If they march with the verdict of the connoisseurs, so much the better for the connoisseurs; if they do not so march, so much the better for oneself.  Every one cannot admire and love everything; but let a man look at things fairly and without prejudice, and make his own selection, holding to it firmly, but not endeavouring to impose his taste upon others; defending, if needs be, his preferences, but making no claim to authority.

The time of my life that I consider to have been wasted, from the intellectual point of view, was the time when I tried, in a spirit of dumb loyalty, to admire all the things that were said to be admirable.  Better spent was the time when I was finding out that much that had received the stamp of the world’s approval was not to be approved, at least by me; best of all was the time when I was learning to appraise the value of things to myself, and learning to love them for their own sake and mine.

Respect of a deferential and constitutional type is out of place in art and literature.  It is a good enough guide to begin one’s pilgrimage with, if one soon parts company from it.  Rather one must learn to give honour where honour is due, to bow down in true reverence before all spirits that are noble and adorable, whether they wear crowns and bear titles of honour, or whether they are simple and unnoted persons, who wear no gold on their garments.

Sincerity and simplicity! if I could only say how I reverence them, how I desire to mould my life in accordance with them!  And I would learn, too, swiftly to detect the living spirits, whether they be young or old, in which these great qualities reign.

For I believe that there is in life a great and guarded city, of which we may be worthy to be citizens.  We may, if we are blest, be always of the happy number, by some kindly gift of God; but we may also, through misadventure and pain, through errors and blunders, learn the way thither.  And sometimes we discern the city afar off, with her radiant spires and towers, her walls of strength, her gates of pearl; and there may come a day, too, when we have found the way thither, and enter in; happy if we go no more out, but happy, too, even if we may not rest there, because we know that, however far we wander, there is always a hearth for us and welcoming smiles.

I speak in a parable, but those who are finding the way will understand me, however dimly; and those who have found the way, and seen a little of the glory of the place, will smile at the page and say:  “So he, too, is of the city.”

The city is known by many names, and wears different aspects to different hearts.  But one thing is certain - that no one who has entered there is ever in any doubt again.  He may wander far from the walls, he may visit it but rarely, but it stands there in peace and glory, the one true and real thing for him in mortal time and in whatever lies beyond.