Of course as nothing had been heard
of the expedition for a considerable time, a certain
amount of anxiety was felt, which at length found vent
in paragraphs in the public press, and on 11th January
1780 the London Gazette contained the following:
“Captain Clerke of His Majesty’s
Sloop the Resolution, in a letter to Mr. Stephens,
dated the 8th of June 1779, in the harbour of St. Peter
and St. Paul, Kampschatka, which was received yesterday,
gives the melancholy account of the celebrated Captain
Cook, late Commander of that Sloop, with four of his
private Marines having been killed on the 14th of
February last at the island of Owhyhe, one of a Group
of new-discovered Islands in the 22nd degree of North
Latitude, in an affray with a numerous and tumultuous
Body of the Natives.”
“Captain Clerke adds, that he
received every friendly supply from the Russian Government;
and that as the Companies of the Resolution and her
Consort, the Discovery, were in perfect Health, and
the two Sloops had twelve months Stores and Provisions
on board, he was preparing to make another Attempt
to explore a Northern Passage to Europe.”
The Empress of Russia.
The London Gazette of 8th February says:
“The Empress of Russia expressed
a most deep concern at the Loss of Captain Cook.
She was the more sensibly affected from her very partial
regard to his merits; and when she was informed of
the hospitality shown by the Russian Government at
Kamschatka to Captain Clerke, she said no Subject
in her Dominions could show too much Friendship to
the Survivors of Captain Cook.”
The letter written by Clerke was sent
by express through Petersburg; that is to say, it
was written in the extreme east of Asia in June, and
was sent overland across Siberia to Petersburg, and
thence via Berlin to London, and was there published
in under the six months. A wonderful journey
when the difficulties of transit are taken into consideration.
In the numerous appreciative notices
that appeared in the press relating to Cook and his
work, the Morning Chronicle alone strikes a jarring
string, which is at once met by a reply; and a day
or two after the same paper publishes a long letter
signed Colombus (the style suggests the pen of Sir
Joseph Banks) in which the character and methods of
Cook are most strenuously defended, the writer claiming
to have obtained his knowledge of the man “through
long intercourse with him.”
The Gazetter of 24th January says:
“His Majesty, who had always
the highest opinion of Captain Cook, shed tears when
Lord Sandwich informed him of his death, and immediately
ordered a pension of 300 pounds a year for his widow.”
The amount really granted to Mrs.
Cook was 200 pounds per annum, and the Admiralty in
addition gave her half the proceeds of the Journal
of the Third Voyage, a share in the Journal of the
Second Voyage, and a share of the plates used in illustrating
the two publications: a very considerable addition
to her income. A Coat of Arms was also granted
to the family by order of the King, and Sir W. Besant
records his belief that it was the last one ever granted
as a direct “recognition of Service.”
His description of it is:
“Azure, between the two polar
stars Or, a sphere on the plane of the meridian, showing
the Pacific Ocean, his track thereon marked by red
lines. And for a crest, on a wreath of the colours,
is an arm bowed, in the uniform of a Captain of the
Royal Navy. In the hand is the Union Jack on
a staff proper. The arm is encircled by a wreath
of palm and laurel. A very noble shield indeed.”
The notes of appreciation of his talents
and services came from all parts of the world, and
none more kindly than from the series of brilliant
Frenchmen who followed in his footsteps. De Crozet
did not hesitate to throw away his own charts when
he recognised the superiority of Cook’s; and
Dumont d’Urville calls him “the most illustrious
navigator of both the past and future ages whose name
will for ever remain at the head of the list of sailors
of all nations.”
Mrs. Cook’s letter.
The Royal Society was naturally amongst
the first to recognise the great worth of its late
Fellow, and the loss the Society had suffered from
his death. It had already granted him one of
its highest honours in the form of the Copley Gold
Medal for his successful contest with the scurvy, and
it now decided to mark its appreciation by striking
a special gold medal in his honour. This was
forwarded by Sir Joseph Banks, President of the Royal
Society, to Mrs. Cook, and acknowledged by her in the
following touching letter:
Mile End,
16th August 1784.
Sir,
I received your exceeding kind letter
of the 12th instant, and want words to express in
any adequate degree my feelings on the very singular
honour which you, Sir, and the honourable and learned
Society over which you so worthily preside, have been
pleased to confer on my late husband, and through
him on me and his children who are left to lament the
loss of him, and to be the receivers of those most
noble marks of approbations which, if Providence
had been pleased to permit him to receive, would have
rendered me very happy indeed.
Be assured, Sir, that however unequal
I may be to the task of expressing it, I feel as I
ought the high honour which the Royal Society has been
pleased to do me. My greatest pleasure now remaining
is in my sons, who, I hope, will ever strive to copy
after so good an example, and, animated by the honours
bestowed on their Father’s memory, be ambitious
of attaining by their own merits your notice and approbation.
Let me entreat you to add to the many acts of friendship
which I have already received at your hands, that
of expressing my gratitude and thanks to that learned
body in such a manner as may be acceptable to them.
I am, Sir, etc., etc.,
Elizabeth Cook.
The medal actually presented to Mrs. Cook is now in
the British Museum.
Deaths of the sons.
It is greatly to be regretted that
so little can be ascertained about Cook’s private
life that would be of service in forming an intimate
knowledge of his character, but this is accounted for
by the fact that after he had joined the Navy his
time was so fully occupied by that service that he
had but little opportunity to form private friendships
such as fall to the lot of most men. The intimacies
that he did form were mostly connected very closely
with his naval duties, and his opportunities of correspondence
were necessarily limited by absence from all ordinary
means of communication. For a man of his marked
celebrity it is very curious that there should be
such a dearth of anecdote that it is difficult to
find anything that is unconnected with his profession.
Of his own family relations there is also little known,
as Mrs. Cook, probably esteeming the few letters she
had from him as too sacred to be seen by any other
eye than her own, as the late Canon Bennett suggests,
destroyed them before her death. Still some idea
of their life together, short as it really was, notwithstanding
it lasted, in name, for over sixteen years, may be
gained from the manner in which his widow always spoke
of him after his death. She always wore a ring
containing a lock of his hair, and measured everything
by his standard of morality and honour. The greatest
disapprobation she could express was “Mr. Cook
would never have done so.” He was always
Mr. Cook to her. She kept four days each year
as solemn fasts, remaining in her own room. The
days were those on which she lost her husband and
three sons, passing them in reading her husband’s
Bible, prayer and meditation, and during bad weather
she could not sleep for thinking of those at sea.
For her husband’s sake she befriended her nephews
and nieces whom she never saw. Of her three sons,
two entered the Navy. One, Nathaniel, was lost
with his ship, the Thunderer, in a hurricane off Jamaica
in 1780. The eldest, James, rose to the rank
of Commander, and in January 1794 was appointed to
H.M. sloop Spitfire. He was at Poole when he
received his orders to join his ship at Portsmouth
without delay. Finding an open boat with sailors
returning from leave about to start, he joined them.
It was blowing rather hard, and nothing was ever heard
of the passengers or crew, except that the broken
boat and the dead body of the unfortunate young officer,
stripped of all money and valuables, with a wound
in the head, was found ashore on the Isle of Wight.
The third son, Hugh, was entered at Christ’s
College, Cambridge, in 1793, but contracting scarlet
fever he died on 21st December of that year, and was
buried in the church of St. Andrew the Great, being
joined by his brother James a few weeks afterwards,
when the mother was left indeed alone. She survived
her husband for the long period of fifty-six years,
living at Clapham with her cousin, Admiral Isaac Smith,
and at length joined her two sons at Cambridge at the
advanced age of ninety-three.
Cook’s character as given by
those with whom he worked, men who day after day were
by his side, was a fine one. His greatest fault
seems to have been his hasty temper, which he admitted
himself, often most regretfully; but Captain King
says it was “disarmed by a disposition the most
benevolent and humane,” and it never was displayed
in such a manner as to cause the loss of respect and
affection of his people. He was healthy and vigorous
in mind and body, clear-headed and cool in times of
danger, broad minded and temperate, and plain and
unaffected in manner. His powers of observation
were of the first rank, his knowledge of Naval mathematics
far surpassed the ordinary level and amounted to genius,
but, above all, his devotion to duty was the commanding
feature of his character. Nothing was allowed
to interfere when he saw his course before him; personal
convenience was not allowed to weigh for one moment,
but at the same time he never lost sight of the interests
of those under him and spared them when possible.
He was somewhat silent and reserved in manner, but
when questioned on any subject on which he felt he
was an authority, his answers were clearly and distinctly
given, and his reasons disclosed his powers of observation
to the full. He was kindly, generous, and hospitable,
and by no means the stern character that has been painted,
for even in such a matter-of-fact document as his official
Journal, a spirit of fun occasionally gleams out.
Such was the man whose name will ever
stand in the very first ranks of the British Empire
Builders; honest, kindly, generous, a faithful servant
and a noble leader.