“THE devil!” Paul Garnett exclaimed as he re-read his note; and the dry old gentleman who was at the moment his only neighbour in the quiet restaurant they both frequented, remarked with a smile:  “You don’t seem particularly annoyed at meeting him.”

Garnett returned the smile.  “I don’t know why I apostrophized him, for he’s not in the least present ­except inasmuch as he may prove to be at the bottom of anything unexpected.”

The old gentleman who, like Garnett, was an American, and spoke in the thin rarefied voice which seems best fitted to emit sententious truths, twisted his lean neck toward the younger man and cackled out shrewdly:  “Ah, it’s generally a woman who is at the bottom of the unexpected.  Not,” he added, leaning forward with deliberation to select a tooth-pick, “that that precludes the devil’s being there too.”

Garnett uttered the requisite laugh, and his neighbour, pushing back his plate, called out with a perfectly unbending American intonation:  “Gassong!  L’addition, silver play.”

His repast, as usual, had been a simple one, and he left only thirty centimes in the plate on which his account was presented; but the waiter, to whom he was evidently a familiar presence, received the tribute with Latin affability, and hovered helpfully about the table while the old gentleman cut and lighted his cigar.

“Yes,” the latter proceeded, revolving the cigar meditatively between his thin lips, “they’re generally both in the same hole, like the owl and the prairie-dog in the natural history books of my youth.  I believe it was all a mistake about the owl and the prairie-dog, but it isn’t about the unexpected.  The fact is, the unexpected is the devil ­the sooner you find that out, the happier you’ll be.”  He leaned back, tilting his smooth bald head against the blotched mirror behind him, and rambling on with gentle garrulity while Garnett attacked his omelet.

“Get your life down to routine ­eliminate surprises.  Arrange things so that, when you get up in the morning, you’ll know exactly what is going to happen to you during the day ­and the next day and the next.  I don’t say it’s funny ­it ain’t.  But it’s better than being hit on the head by a brick-bat.  That’s why I always take my meals at this restaurant.  I know just how much onion they put in things ­if I went to the next place I shouldn’t.  And I always take the same streets to come here ­I’ve been doing it for ten years now.  I know at which crossings to look out ­I know what I’m going to see in the shop-windows.  It saves a lot of wear and tear to know what’s coming.  For a good many years I never did know, from one minute to another, and now I like to think that everything’s cut-and-dried, and nothing unexpected can jump out at me like a tramp from a ditch.”

He paused calmly to knock the ashes from his cigar, and Garnett said with a smile:  “Doesn’t such a plan of life cut off nearly all the possibilities?”

The old gentleman made a contemptuous motion.  “Possibilities of what?  Of being multifariously miserable?  There are lots of ways of being miserable, but there’s only one way of being comfortable, and that is to stop running round after happiness.  If you make up your mind not to be happy there’s no reason why you shouldn’t have a fairly good time.”

“That was Schopenhauer’s idea, I believe,” the young man said, pouring his wine with the smile of youthful incredulity.

“I guess he hadn’t the monopoly,” responded his friend.  “Lots of people have found out the secret ­the trouble is that so few live up to it.”

He rose from his seat, pushing the table forward, and standing passive while the waiter advanced with his shabby overcoat and umbrella.  Then he nodded to Garnett, lifted his hat politely to the broad-bosomed lady behind the desk, and passed out into the street.

Garnett looked after him with a musing smile.  The two had exchanged views on life for two years without so much as knowing each other’s names.  Garnett was a newspaper correspondent whose work kept him mainly in London, but on his periodic visits to Paris he lodged in a dingy hotel of the Latin Quarter, the chief merit of which was its nearness to the cheap and excellent restaurant where the two Americans had made acquaintance.  But Garnett’s assiduity in frequenting the place arose, in the end, less from the excellence of the food than from the enjoyment of his old friend’s conversation.  Amid the flashy sophistications of the Parisian life to which Garnett’s trade introduced him, the American sage’s conversation had the crisp and homely flavor of a native dish ­one of the domestic compounds for which the exiled palate is supposed to yearn.  It was a mark of the old man’s impersonality that, in spite of the interest he inspired, Garnett had never got beyond idly wondering who he might be, where he lived, and what his occupations were.  He was presumably a bachelor ­a man of family ties, however relaxed, though he might have been as often absent from home would not have been as regularly present in the same place ­and there was about him a boundless desultoriness which renewed Garnett’s conviction that there is no one on earth as idle as an American who is not busy.  From certain allusions it was plain that he had lived many years in Paris, yet he had not taken the trouble to adapt his tongue to the local inflections, but spoke French with the accent of one who has formed his conception of the language from a phrase-book.

The city itself seemed to have made as little impression on him as its speech.  He appeared to have no artistic or intellectual curiosities, to remain untouched by the complex appeal of Paris, while preserving, perhaps the more strikingly from his very detachment, that odd American astuteness which seems the fruit of innocence rather than of experience.  His nationality revealed itself again in a mild interest in the political problems of his adopted country, though they appeared to preoccupy him only as illustrating the boundless perversity of mankind.  The exhibition of human folly never ceased to divert him, and though his examples of it seemed mainly drawn from the columns of one exiguous daily paper, he found there matter for endless variations on his favorite theme.  If this monotony of topic did not weary the younger man, it was because he fancied he could detect under it the tragic implication of the fixed idea ­of some great moral upheaval which had flung his friend stripped and starving on the desert island of the little cafe where they met.  He hardly knew wherein he read this revelation ­whether in the resigned shabbiness of the sage’s dress, the impartial courtesy of his manner, or the shade of apprehension which lurked, indescribably, in his guileless yet suspicious eye.  There were moments when Garnett could only define him by saying that he looked like a man who had seen a ghost.