The World is too much with us;
late and soon
Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers;
Little we see in nature that is ours;
We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon.
Great God! I’d
rather be
A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn,
So might I, standing on this pleasant lea,
Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;
Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea;
Or hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn.
Wordsworth.
They had been sitting by the fire
in silence for a long time. Robin had been sewing,
but the blaze had sunk too low to see by it, and her
hands were folded idly upon her mending. She put
it by, and went to the window. It was a very
dark night, and the stars shone brilliantly.
The stars had come to mean a great deal to them both,
howbeit neither had ever said so. The stars only
were unchanged. “The thoughts of God in
the heavens” were the same, whatever might be
His thought on earth.
She sighed so heavily, that Adam asked
quickly, “What is it?” and she answered,
with a nervous laugh, “I was thinking of the
old legend, that the souls on other planets call ours
‘the sorrowful world.’ What made
it so sorrowful, Adam?”
“Ignorance would cover it all,”
he answered, “but to be specific, intemperance,
sensuality, avarice, and poverty. I don’t
mean drunkenness only, when I say intemperance.
I have known a few prohibitionists in my time who
were as intemperate in their eating as any one could
be in the matter of drink. I think intemperance
in its widest sense was the great curse of our time
anyway; drink and tobacco and tea and coffee; and
as to our eating, there was too much, of almost everything
on earth that was not food, but which could be over-salted
and over-peppered, and treated with tabasco sauce.
We over-stimulated every activity of the body, and
spent our lives doing all kinds of things in which
there was no sense. Think of reading one or two
morning and evening papers every day. To be sure
we said there was nothing in them, but we used up
our eyesight over them, and let a stream of silliness
and scandal dribble through our minds. As to the
things we wore
Robin laughed. “I know,”
she said. “The sewing-machine didn’t
save work; it only made ruffles. A dressmaker
once said to me, ’It’s a good thing for
me that these women haven’t sense enough to spend
their time and money on themselves, in making their
bodies free and strong and beautiful. But no;
they would rather have a stylish dress than a graceful
body. They don’t care to be beautiful themselves;
all they want is a handsome gown to cover their ugliness.’
Isn’t it strange that we never seemed able to
realize that the Greek fashions were immortal because
they were beautiful?”
“Still, I don’t think
the dress of the Greek women would be very convenient
for housework,” ventured Adam.
Robin shook her head. “You
only say that because some woman has said it to you.
The Diana of the Stag wore the first rainy-day gown.
The Greek dress was capable of ever so many modifications.
If I were making a handbook of proverbs for women,
I should say, ’A good complexion is rather to
be chosen than many fine dresses, and glossy and abundant
hair turneth away wrath.’ I believe in the
simplification of life. I understand just how
Thoreau felt when he threw out that specimen because
it had to be dusted daily. There are very few
things beautiful enough to pay for that amount of
trouble. But perhaps that is because I don’t
care for specimens, and I loathe dusting.”
“You ought to have been a Jap,”
said Adam. “There was one in college, in
my class, and one day when I was fretting over something
I could not afford he said, in that immensely polite
way of theirs, ’You I cannot understand.
With all American people it so is, even as by Ruskin
said was it; whatever you have, of it you more would
get, and where you are, you would go from. You
happy are only when something you get, and never that
you yourself are.’ But I think the Celestial
was wrong there. When a man is self-conscious
of illy-made garments, a mean domicile, a poor kind
of half education, he is uncomfortable; he hasn’t
accomplished his evolution from the conscious, the
self-conscious, to the unconscious. It was this
very discomfort and inequality that used so to enrage
me, for it need not have been.”
“I wish,” said Robin,
“we knew how to make paper; of all the fascinating
things in Bellamy’s ‘Equality,’ there
was nothing I liked so well as the idea of paper garments,
to be burned when one got through with them.
Think of never having any washing and ironing, and
always having new clothes.”
“I wonder whether we could invent
some of those things over again,” said Adam,
reflectively.
“I couldn’t spare you
any of my precious rags, if you could,” said
Robin.
“Most of the paper was made
out of wood, anyhow,” answered Adam, “and
the ash that grows here in any quantity was considered
particularly fine for that purpose.”
“‘God made man upright,
but he hath sought out many inventions,’”
quoted Robin, “and now we are going to seek them
over again. I can’t imagine how anyone
could ever make a lineotype, but the type and the
hand-press are easy enough, and if you can make paper,
we may yet live to read our ‘published works.’
You probably do not know that I used to have a Wegg-like
facility for dropping into poetry.”
“Did you? That is another
of the things you never told me; but your speaking
of Thoreau,” answered Adam, “recalls what
he said of the amount of work necessary to sustain
life beside Walden Pond. It took six weeks out
of the year, and that was in a most forbidding country.
In such a valley as this two months ought to be sufficient
to more than feed and clothe us; but then he didn’t
have to make his own clothing.”
“And out of nothing particular,” interrupted
Robin.
Adam laughed and went on. “Did
you ever hear of a man called Hertzka? He was
an eminent Austrian sociologist, and he figured it
out, that if five million men should work a little
less than an hour and three quarters a day they could
produce all the necessities of life for the twenty-two
million people of Austria. By working two hours
and twelve minutes daily for two months beside, they
could have all the luxuries also. And that not
for a few, not for the Court and the nobility, but
for all. There could have been music and pictures
and books and theatres, and sufficient food and clothing.
Isn’t it strange that when we might have been
so happy we preferred to be so wretched? For even
if we had all we wanted ourselves, we could not escape
the sights and sounds that told of abject misery.”
“It was always so,” Robin
answered moodily. “The poor we had always
with us. History always repeated itself.”
“Still, it didn’t exactly
repeat itself,” Adam said. “Our dark
age would have done for a golden age in the past.
Greece was glorious for a little while, but her literature
tells us of her ideals. The isles of Greece,
where Byron contracted his last illness, would have
left him to die among the rocks twenty-five hundred
years earlier, because he had a lame foot. We
at least were kinder to animals, and that means a
great deal.”
“I don’t know,”
she answered. “Perhaps; it seems to me I
have read of a hospital for sick animals on the island
of Ceylon a long sometime B. C. Lady Mary Wortley
Montagu or was it Lady Hester Stanhope? said
she had traveled all over the world, and had never
found but two kinds of people, men and
women. I fancy the same thing is true of all the
ages as well as all the countries.”
“No,” Adam said, shaking
his head; “our ideals change. The scheme
of life laid down by Christ was to the Greeks foolishness
and to the Jews a stumbling-block, and there were
plenty of Greeks and Jews in our day. By Greeks
I mean people whose ideals were purely intellectual,
and by Jews those who saw no good save a material good,
no God but the God of Mammon. They would not
hear either Moses or the prophets, and the statute
of limitations was as near as they could come to the
Sabbatic year. The Greek and the Jew have stood
ready with their cup of hemlock, their crown of thorns
for every Christ-spirit that has ever come to earth.
Yet more people read Socrates, and believed on the
Nazarene every year. I don’t mean in the
church; the working-man did not go to church, but
he uncovered his head at the name of Christ, the first
lawgiver who confounded the scribes and Pharisees,
and ate with publicans and sinners.”
“But Moses was the first lawgiver
to forbid taking the nether millstone as a pledge,”
objected Robin.
“True,” he admitted, “and
the laws of Moses would have made the world over.
He was the greatest writer on political economy this
earth has ever seen. His absolute fiat against
the alienation of the land would have done more for
the common people than all Adam Smith’s theories
of free competition, and Fourier’s dream of
a perfected communism. But who would have known
of Moses, save for Christ? The Old Testament
would have been merely the sacred book of the Hebrews,
and save as a literary and historic work, of very
uncertain historic value, would have been unread,
as the Koran and other books of a similar nature were
unread.”
“And yet you do not believe
in the divinity of Christ,” she said slowly.
“No,” he answered.
“Is that necessary before one can believe in
his teachings? The truth is always divine.
What difference does it make whether the one who utters
it be human or divine, bond or slave, AEsop or Marcus
Aurelius? the truth remains the same. A fable
is only another name of a parable. We have the
story of the lost sheep; that’s a parable; and
that of the lamb that muddied the stream, and that’s
a fable. One is sacred, the other profane, but
both are fables, both parables. When you take
them away from the context it is as easy to feel for
the lamb eaten by the wolf, as for the one that was
rescued, and has been immortalized in picture and
song.”
“Probably you are right,”
she said. “I never thought of it in just
that way before,” and saying “good night”
she went to her room.
Adam thought he heard her humming,
“Away on the mountains cold and bare.”