The first school that I ever tried
to teach was, indeed, fearfully and wonderfully taught.
The teaching was of the sort that might well be called
elemental. If there was any pedagogy connected
with the work, it was purely accidental. I was
not conscious either of its presence or its absence,
and so deserve neither praise nor censure. I
had one pupil who was nine years my senior, and I did
not even know that he was retarded. I recall
quite distinctly that he had a luxuriant crop of chin-whiskers
but even these did not disturb the procedure of that
school. We accepted him as he was, whiskers
included, and went on our complacent way. He
was blind in one eye and somewhat deaf, but no one
ever thought of him as abnormal or subnormal.
Even if we had known these words we should have been
too polite to apply them to him. In fact, we
had no black-list, of any sort, in that school.
I have never been able to determine whether the absence
of such a list was due to ignorance, or innocence,
or both. So long as he found the school an agreeable
place in which to spend the winter, and did not interfere
with the work of others, I could see no good reason
why he should not be there and get what he could from
the lessons in spelling, geography, and arithmetic.
I do not mention grammar for that was quite beyond
him. The agreement of subject and verb was one
of life’s great mysteries to him. So I
permitted him to browse around in such pastures as
seemed finite to him, and let the infinite grammar
go by default so far as he was concerned.
I have but the most meagre acquaintance
with the pedagogical dicta of the books a
mere bowing acquaintance but, at that time,
I had not even been introduced to any of these.
But, as the saying goes, “The Lord takes care
of fools and children,” and, so, somehow, by
sheer blind luck, I instinctively veered away from
the Procrustean bed idea, and found some work for
my bewhiskered disciple that connected with his native
dispositions. Had any one told me I was doing
any such things I think I should, probably, have asked
him how to spell the words he was using. I only
knew that this man-child was there yearning for knowledge,
and I was glad to share my meagre store of crumbs
with him. His gratitude for my small gifts was
really pathetic, and right there I learned the joys
of the teacher. That man sought me out on our
way home from school and asked questions that would
have puzzled Socrates, but forgot my ignorance of hard
questions in his joy at my answers of easy ones.
When some light would break in upon him he cavorted
about me like a glad dog, and became a second Columbus,
discovering a new world.
I almost lose patience with myself,
at times, when I catch myself preening my feathers
before some pedagogical mirror, as if I were getting
ready to appear in public as an accredited schoolmaster.
At such a time, I long to go back to the country
road and saunter along beside some pupil, either with
or without whiskers, and give him of my little store
without rules or frills and with no pomp or parade.
In that little school at the crossroads we never made
any preparation for some possible visitor who might
come in to survey us or apply some efficiency test,
or give us a rating either as individuals or as a
school. We were too busy and happy for that.
We kept right on at our work with our doors and our
hearts wide open for every good thing that came our
way, whether knowledge or people. As I have said,
our work was elemental.
I am glad I came across this little
book of William James, “On Some of Life’s
Ideals,” for it takes me back, inferentially,
to that elemental school, especially in this paragraph
which says: “Life is always worth living,
if one have such responsive sensibilities. But
we of the highly educated classes (so-called) have
most of us got far, far away from Nature. We
are trained to seek the choice, the rare, the exquisite
exclusively and to overlook the common. We are
stuffed with abstract conceptions, and glib with verbalities
and verbosities; and in the culture of these higher
functions the peculiar sources of joy connected with
our simpler functions often dry up, and we grow stone-blind
and insensible to life’s more elementary and
general goods and joys.”
I wish I might go home from school
one evening by way of the top of Mt. Vesuvius,
another by way of Mt. Rigi, and, another, by way
of Lauterbrunnen. Then the next evening I should
like to spend an hour or two along the borders of
Yellowstone Canyon, and the next, watch an eruption
or two of Old Faithful geyser. Then, on still
another evening, I’d like to ride for two hours
on top of a bus in London. I’d like to
have these experiences as an antidote for emptiness.
It would prepare me far better for to-morrow work
than pondering Johnny’s defections, or his grades,
whether high or low, or marking silly papers with
marks that are still sillier. I like Walt Whitman
because he was such a sublime loafer. His loafing
gave him time to grow big inside, and so, he had big
elemental thoughts that were good for him and good
for me when I think them over after him.
If I should ever get a position in
a normal school I’d want to give a course in
William J. Locke’s “The Beloved Vagabond,”
so as to give the young folks a conception of big
elemental teaching. If I were giving a course
in ethics, I’d probably select another book,
but, in pedagogy, I’d certainly include that
one. I’d lose some students, to be sure,
for some of them would be shocked; but a person who
is not big enough to profit by reading that book never
ought to teach school I mean for the school’s
sake. If we could only lose the consciousness
of the fact that we are schoolmasters for a few hours
each day, it would be a great help to us and to our
boys and girls.
I am quite partial to the “Madonna
of the Chair,” and wish I might visit the Pitti
Gallery frequently just to gaze at her. She is
so wholesome and gives one the feeling that a big
soul looks out through her eyes. She would be
a superb teacher. She would fill the school
with her presence and still do it all unconsciously.
The centre of the room would be where she happened
to be. She would never be mistaken for one of
the pupils. Her pupils would learn arithmetic
but the arithmetic would be laden with her big spirit,
and that would be better for them than the arithmetic
could possibly be. If I had to be a woman I’d
want to be such as this Madonna serene,
majestic, and big-souled.
I have often wondered whether bigness
of soul can be cultivated, and my optimism inclines
to a vote in the affirmative. I spent a part
of one summer in the pine woods far away from the
haunts of men. When I had to leave this sylvan
retreat it required eleven hours by stage to reach
the railway-station. There for some weeks I lived
in a log cabin, accompanied by a cook and a professional
woodsman. I was not there to camp, to fish,
or to loaf, and yet I did all these. There were
some duties and work connected with the enterprise
and these gave zest to the fishing and the loafing.
Giant trees, space, and sky were my most intimate
associates, and they told me only of big things.
They had never a word to say of styles of clothing
or becoming shades of neckwear or hosiery. In
all that time I was never disturbed by the number
and diversity of spoons and forks beside my plate
at the dinner-table. Many a noble meal I ate
as I sat upon a log supported in forked stakes, and
many a big thought did I glean from the talk of loggers
about me in their picturesque costumes. In the
evening I sat upon a great log in front of the cabin
or a friendly stump, and forgot such things as hammocks
and porch-swings. Instead of gazing at street-lamps
only a few yards away I was gazing at stars millions
of miles away, and, somehow, the soul seemed to gain
freedom.
And I had luxury, too. I had
a room with bath. The bath was at the stream
some fifty yards away, but such discrepancies are minor
affairs in the midst of such big elemental things as
were all about me. My mattress was of young
cherry shoots, and never did king have a more royal
bed, or ever such refreshing sleep. And, while
I slept, I grew inside, for the soft music of the
pines lulled me to rest, and the subdued rippling
of my bath-stream seemed to wash my soul clean.
When I arose I had no bad taste in my mouth or in my
soul, and each morning had for me the glory of a resurrection.
My trees were there to bid me good morning, the big
spaces spoke to me in their own inspiriting language,
and the big sun, playing hide-and-seek among the great
boles of the trees as he mounted from the horizon,
gave me a panorama unrivalled among the scenes of
earth.
When I returned to what men called
civilization, I experienced a poignant longing for
my big trees, my sky, and my spaces, and felt that
I had exchanged them for many things that are petty
and futile. If my school were only out in the
heart of that big forest, I feel that my work would
be more effective and that I would not have to potter
about among little things to obey the whims of convention
and the dictates of technicalities, but that the soul
would be free to revel in the truth that sky and space
proclaim. I do hope I may never know so much
about technical pedagogy that I shall not know anything
else. This may be what those people mean who
speak of the “revolt of the ego.”