The crime of Huahine for love of Weaver of Mats; story of Tahia’s
white man who was eaten; the disaster that befell Honi, the white
man who used his harpoon against his friends.
During my absence in Taaoa there had
been crime and scandal in my own valley. Andre
Bauda met me on the beach road as I returned and told
me the tale. The giant Tahitian sailor of the
schooner Papeite, Huahine, was in the local
jail, charged with desertion; a serious offense, to
which his plea was love of a woman, and that woman
Weaver of Mats, who had her four names tattooed on
her right arm.
Huahine, seeing her upon the beach,
had felt a flame of love that nerved him to risk hungry
shark and battering surf. Carried from her even
in the moment of meeting, he had resisted temptation
until the schooner was sailing outside the Bay of
Traitors, running before a breeze to the port of Tai-o-hae,
and then he had flung himself naked into the sea and
taken the straight course back to Atuona, reaching
his sweetheart after a seven-hour’s struggle
with current and breaker. Flag, the gendarme,
found him in her hut, and brought him to the calaboose.
The following morning I attended his
trial. He came before his judge elegantly dressed,
for, besides a red pareu about his middle, he
wore a pink silk shawl over his shoulders. Both
were the gift of Weaver of Mats, as he had come to
her without scrip or scrap. He needed little
clothing, as his skin was very brown and his strong
body magnificent.
He was an acceptable prisoner to Bauda,
who had charge of the making and repair of roads and
bridges, so Huahine was quickly sentenced and put
to work with others who were paying their taxes by
labor. Weaver of Mats moved with him to the prison,
where they lived together happily, cooking their food
in the garden and sleeping on mats beneath the palms.
On all the paepaes it was said
that Huahine would probably be sent to Tahiti, as
there are strict laws against deserting ships and
against vagabondage in the Marquesas. Meantime
the prisoner was happy. Many a Tahitian and white
sailor gazes toward these islands as a haven from
trouble, and in Huahine’s exploit I read the
story of many a poor white who in the early days cast
away home and friends and arduous toil to dwell here
in a breadfruity harem.
“There is a tale told long ago
by a man of Hanamenu to a traveler named Christian,”
I said to Haabunai, the carver, while we sat rolling
pandanus cigarettes in the cool of the evening.
“It runs thus:
“Some thirty years ago a sailor
from a trading schooner that had put into the bay
for sandalwood was badly treated by his skipper, who
refused him shore-leave. So, his bowels hot with
anger, this sailor determined to desert his hard and
unthanked toil, wed some island heiress, and live
happy ever after. Therefore one evening he swam
ashore, found a maid to his liking, and was hidden
by her until the ship departed.
“Now Tahia was a good wife,
and loved her beautiful white man; all that a wife
could do she did, cooking his food, bathing his feet,
rolling cigarettes for him all day long as he lay upon
the mats. But her father in time became troubled,
and there was grumbling among the people, for the
white man would not work.
“He would not climb the palm
to bring down the nuts; he lay and laughed on his
paepae in the Meinui, the season of breadfruit,
when all were busy; and when they brought him rusty
old muskets to care for, he turned his back upon them.
Sometimes he fished, going out in a canoe that Tahia
paddled, and making her fix the bait on the hook,
but he caught few fish.
“‘Aue te hanahana,
aua ho’i te kaikai,’ said his father-in-law.
’He who will not labor, neither shall he eat.’
But the white man laughed and ate and labored not.
“A season passed and another,
and there came a time of little rain. The bananas
were few, and the breadfruit were not plentiful.
One evening, therefore, the old men met in conference,
and this was their decision: ‘Rats are
becoming a nuisance, and we will abate them.’
“Next morning the father sent
Tahia on an errand to another valley. Then men
began to dig a large oven in the earth before Tahia’s
house, where the white man lay on the mats at ease.
Presently he looked and wondered and looked again.
And at length he rose and came down to the oven, saying,
‘What’s up?’
“‘Plenty kaikai. Big pig come
by and by,’ they said.
“So he stood waiting while they
dug, and no pig came. Then he said, ‘Where
is the pig?’ And at that moment the u’u
crashed upon his skull, so that he fell without life
and lay in the oven. Wood was piled about him,
and he was baked, and there was feasting in Hanamenu.
“In the twilight Tahia came
over the hills, weary and hungry, and asked for her
white man. ‘He has gone to the beach,’
they said.
“He will return soon, therefore
sit and eat, my daughter,” said her father,
and gave her the meat wrapped in leaves. So she
ate heartily, and waited for her husband. And
all the feasters laughed at her, so that little by
little she learned the truth. She said nothing,
but went away in the darkness.
“And it is written, Haabunai,
that searchers for the mei came upon her next
day in the upper valley, and she was hanging from a
tall palm-tree with a rope of purau about her
neck.”
“That may be a true story,”
said Haabunai. “Though it is the custom
here to eat the eva when one is made sick by
life. And very few white men were ever eaten
in the islands, because they knew too much and were
claimed by some woman of power.” He paused
for a moment to puff his cigarette.
“Now there was a sailor whom
my grandfather ate, and he was white. But there
was ample cause for that, for never was a man so provoking.
“He was a harpooner on a whale-ship,
a man who made much money, but he liked rum, and when
his ship left he stayed behind. They sent two
boats ashore and searched for him, but my grandfather
sent my father with him into the hills, and after
three days the captain thought he had been drowned,
and sailed away without him.
“My grandfather gave him my
father’s sister to wife, and like that man of
whom you told, he was much loved by her, though he
would do nothing but make namu enata and drink
it and dance and sleep. Grandfather said that
he could dance strange dances of the sailor that made
them all laugh until their ribs were sore.
“This man, whose name was Honi ”
“Honi?” said I. “I do not know
that word.”
“Nor I. It is not Marquesan.
It was his name, that he bore on the ship.”
“Honi?” I repeated incredulously,
and then light broke. “You mean Jones?”
“It may be. I do not know.
Honi was his name, as my grandfather said it.
And this Honi had brought from the whale-ship a gun
and a harpoon. This harpoon had a head of iron
and was fixed on a spear, with a long rope tied to
the head, so that when it was thrust into the whale
he was fastened to the boat that pursued him through
the water. There was no weapon like it on the
island, and it was much admired.
“Honi fought with us when our
tribe, the Papuaei, went to war with the Tiu of Taaoa.
He used his gun, and with it he won many battles,
until he had killed so many of the enemy that they
asked for peace. Honi was praised by our tribe,
and a fine house was built for him near the river,
in the place where eels and shrimp were best.
“In this large house he drank
more than in the other smaller one. He used his
gun to kill pigs and even birds. My grandfather
reproved him for wasting the powder, when pigs could
easily be killed with spears. But Honi would
not listen, and he continued to kill until he had
no more powder. Then he quarreled with my grandfather,
and one day, being drunk, he tried to kill him, and
then fled to the Kau-i-te-oho, the tribe of redheaded
people at Hanahupe.
“Learning that Honi was no longer
with us, the Tiu tribe of Taaoa declared war again,
and the red-headed tribe had an alliance with them
through their chief’s families intermarrying,
so that Honi fought with them. His gun being
without powder, he took his harpoon, and he came with
the Tui and the Kau-i-te-oho to the dividing-line
between the valleys where we used to fight.
“Where the precipices reared
their middle points between the valleys, the tribes
met and reviled one another.
“’You people with hair
like cooked shrimp! Are you ready for the ovens
of our valley?’ cried my grandfather’s
warriors.
“’You little men, who
run so fast, we have now your white warrior with us,
and you shall die by the hundreds!’ yelled our
enemies.”
This picture of the scene at the line
was characteristic of Polynesian warfare. It
is almost exactly like the meeting of armies long
ago in Palestine and Syria, and before the walls of
Troy. Goliath slanged David grossly, threatening
to give his body to the fowls of the air and the beasts
of the field, and David retorted in kind. So,
when Ulysses launched his spear at Soccus, he
cried:
“Ah, wretch, no father shall they
corpse compose,
Thy dying eye no tender mother close;
But hungry birds shall tear those
balls away,
And hungry vultures scream around
their prey.”
“For a quarter of an hour,”
said Haabunai, “my grandfather’s people
and the warriors of the enemy called thus to each other
upon the top of the cliffs, and then Honi and the
brother of my grandfather, head men of either side,
advanced to battle.
“The first time Honi threw his
harpoon, he hooked my great-uncle. He hooked
him through the middle, and before he could be saved,
a half dozen of the Tiu men pulled on the rope and
dragged him over the line to be killed and eaten.
“Two more of our tribe Honi
snared with this devilish spear, and it was not so
much death as being pulled over to them and roasted
that galled us. All day the battle raged, except
when both sides stopped by agreement to eat popoi
and rest, but late in the afternoon a strange thing
happened.
“Honi had thrown his harpoon,
and by bad aim it entered a tree. The end of
the line he had about his left arm, and as he tried
to pull out the spear-head from the wood, his legs
became entangled in the rope, and my grandfather,
who was very strong, seized the rope near the tree,
dragged the white man over the line, and killed him
with a rock.
“The enemy ran away then, and
that night our people ate Honi. Grandfather said
his flesh was so tough they had to boil it. There
were no tipoti (Standard-oil cans) in those
days, but our people took banana leaves and formed
a big cup that would hold a couple of quarts of water,
and into these they put red-hot stones, and the water
boiled. Grandfather said they cut Honi into small
pieces and boiled him in many of these cups.
Still he was tough, but nevertheless they ate him.
“Honi was tattooed. Not
like Marquesans, but like some white sailors, he had
certain marks on him. Grandfather saved these
marks, and wore them as a tiki, or amulet,
until he died, when he gave it to me. He had
preserved the skin so that it did not spoil.”
Haabunai yawned and said his mouth
was parched from much talking, but when a shell of
rum was set before him and he had drunk, he fetched
from his house the tiki. It was as large
as my hand, dark and withered, but with a magnifying
glass I could see a rude cross and three letters,
I H S in blue.
“Grandfather became a Christian
and was no longer an enata Ttaikaia, an eater
of men, but he kept the tiki always about his
neck, because he thought it gave him strength,”
said my guest.
I handed him back the gruesome relic,
though he began advances to make it my property.
For the full demijohn he would have parted with the
tiki that had been his grandfather’s,
but I had no fancy for it. One can buy in Paris
purses of human skin for not much more than one of
alligator hide.
“Honi must have been very tough,” I said.
“He must have been,” Haabunai
said regretfully. “Grandfather had his
teeth to the last. He would never eat a child.
Like all warriors he preferred for vengeance’s
sake the meat of another fighter.”
He had not yet sprung the grim jest
of almost all cannibalistic narratives. I did
not ask if Honi’s wife had eaten of him, as had
Tahia of her white man. It is probable that she
did, and that they deceived her. It was the practical
joke of those days.
I had seen Apporo, my landlady, staggering
homeward a few days earlier in a pitiful state of
intoxication. Some one had given her a glass
of mixed absinthe, vermuth, and rum, and with confidence
in the giver she had tossed it down. That is
the kind of joke that in other days would have been
the deluding of some one into partaking of the flesh
of a lover or friend.
Reasoning from our standpoint, it
is easy to assume that cannibalism is a form of depravity
practised by few peoples, but this error is dispelled
by the researches of ethnologists, who inform us that
it was one of the most ancient customs of man and
began when he was close brother to the ape. Livingstone,
when he came upon it on the Dark continent, concluded
that the negroes came to that horrible desire from
their liking for the meat of gorillas, which so nearly
approach man in appearance. Herodatus, writing
twenty-five hundred years ago, mentions the Massagetae
who boiled the flesh of their old folks with that
of cattle, both killed for the occasion. Cannibalism
marked the life of all peoples in days of savagery.
Plutarch says that Cataline’s
associates gave proof of their loyalty to that agitator
and to one another by sacrificing and eating a man.
Achilles expressed his wish that he might devour Hector.
The Kafirs ate their own children in the famine of
1857, and the Germans ate one another when starvation
maddened them, long after Maryland and Massachusetts
had become thriving settlements in the New World.
There is a historic instance of a party of American
pioneers lost in the mountains of California in the
nineteenth century, who in their last extremity of
hunger ate several of the party.
To devour dead relatives, to kill
and eat the elders, to feast upon slaves and captives,
even for mothers to eat their children, were religious
and tribal rites for many tens of thousands of years.
We have records of these customs spread over the widest
areas of the world.
Undoubtedly cannibalism began as a
question of food supply. In early times when
man, emerging from the purely animal stage, was without
agricultural skill, and lived in caves or trees, his
fellow was his easiest prey. The great beasts
were too fierce and powerful for his feeble weapons
except when luck favored him, and the clan or family,
or even the single brave hunter, sought the man-meat
by stealth or combat, or in tunes of stress ate those
nearest and dearest.
Specially among peoples whose principal
diet is heavy, starchy food, such as the breadfruit,
the demand for meat is keen. I saw Marquesan
women eating insects, worms, and other repellant bits
of flesh out of sheer instinct and stomachic need.
When salt is not to be had, the desire for meat is
most intense. In these valleys the upper tribes,
whose enemies shut them off from the sea with its salt
and fish, were the most persistent cannibals, and
the same condition exists in Africa to-day, where
the interior tribes eat any corpse, while none of
the coast tribes are guilty.
As the passion for cannibalistic feasts
grew, and it became a passion akin to the
opium habit in some, the supply of other
meat had little to do with its continuance. In
New Britain human bodies were sold in the shops; in
the Solomon Islands victims were fattened like cattle,
and on the upper Congo an organized traffic is carried
on in these empty tenements of the human soul.
Although cannibalism originated in
a bodily need, man soon gave it an emotional and spiritual
meaning, as he has given them to all customs that
have their root in his physical being. Two forms
of cannibalism seem to have existed among the first
historic peoples. One was concerned with the
eating of relatives and intimates, for friendship’s
sake or to gain some good quality they possessed.
Thus when babies died, the Chavante mothers, on the
Uruguay, ate them to regain their souls. Russians
ate their fathers, and the Irish, if Strabo is to
be credited, thought it good to eat both deceased
parents. The Lhopa of Sikkim, in Tibet, eat the
bride’s mother at the wedding feast.
But Maori cannibalism, with its best
exposition in the Marquesas, was due to a desire for
revenge, cooking and eating being the greatest of
insults. It was an expression of jingoism, a hatred
for all outside the tribe or valley, and it made the
feud between valleys almost incessant.
It was in no way immoral, for morals
are the best traditions and ways of each race, and
here the eating of enemies was authorized by every
teaching of priest and leader, by time-honored custom
and the strongest dictates of nature.
White men and Chinese, in fact, all
foreigners, were seldom eaten here. There were
exceptions when vengeance impelled, such at that of
Honi or Jones, whom Haabunai’s grandfather ate,
but as a rule they were spared and indeed cherished,
as strange visitors who might teach the people useful
things. Only their own depravity brought them
to the oven.
At such times, the feast was even
a disagreeable rite. It is a fact that the Marquesan
disliked the flesh of a white man. They said he
was too salty. Hundreds of years ago the Aztecs,
according to Bernal Diaz, who was there, complained
that “the flesh of the Spaniards failed to afford
even nourishment, since it was intolerably bitter.”
This, though the Indians were dying of starvation by
hundreds of thousands in the merciless siege of Mexico
City.
Standards of barbarity vary.
Horrible and revolting as the very mention of cannibalism
is to us, it should be remembered that it rested upon
an attitude toward the foreigner and the slave that
in some degree still persists everywhere in the world.
Outside the tribe, the savage recognized no kindred
humanity. Members of every clan save his own
were regarded as strange and contemptible beings,
outlandish and barbarous in manners and customs, not
to be regarded as sharers of a common birthright.
This attitude toward the stranger did not at all prevent
the cannibal from being, within his own tribe, a gentle,
merry, and kindly individual.
Even toward the stranger the Marquesan
was never guilty of torture of any kind. Though
they slew and ate, they had none of the refinements
of cruelty of the Romans, not even scalping enemies
as did the Scythians, Visigoths, Franks, and Anglo-Saxons.
In their most bloody wars they often paused in battle
to give the enemy time to eat and to rest, and there
is no record of their ever ringing a valley about
with armed warriors and starving to death the women
and children within. Victims for the gods were
struck down without warning, so that they might not
suffer even the pangs of anticipation. The thumb-screw
and rack of Christendom struck with horror those of
my cannibal friends to whom I mentioned them.