Cuthbert, on calling upon the head
of the great firm of accountants, was courteously
received by him.
“Of course, I remember your
name, Mr. Hartington, with reference to the Abchester
Bank failure. It seemed a particularly hard case,
and I know our Mr. Wanklyn, who had charge of the
winding up, took particular interest in it, and personally
consulted me more than once about it, though I cannot
exactly recall the circumstances now. What is
it that you say you want to examine?”
“I want to have a look at the
deed of mortgage that Mr. Brander, who purchased the
property, had upon it.”
“Yes, I remember now, that was
one of the points on which Mr. Wanklyn consulted me.
It struck him at first sight as being rather a remarkable
transaction, and he went into it carefully, but it
was all proved to be correct to his satisfaction.
It is unfortunate that the system of registering mortgages
is not enforced everywhere as it is in London-it
would save a great deal of trouble in such cases as
the present.”
“Are the affairs of the bank quite wound up?”
“Dear me, no, Mr. Hartington.
Why, it is but two years since the failure. There
are properties to be realized that cannot be forced
on the market without ruinous loss. There are
assets which will not be available until after death;
it is not the assets of the bank, but the assets of
individual shareholders and debtors of the bank that
have to be collected. I should say it will be
at least twenty years before the last dividend will
be divided. I am sure Mr. Wanklyn will be happy
to let you see any document you desire. I will
take you to him.”
Mr. Wanklyn had a room on the same
floor with his principal, and Mr. Cox took Cuthbert
and introduced him to him.
“Mr. Hartington wants to have
a look at the mortgage that Brander held on the late
Mr. Hartington’s estate. You remember we
had several talks about it at the time, and you took
a good deal of pains about the matter. Mr. Hartington
wrote to me about it from Paris, if you recollect,
and you replied to him in my name. I will leave
him with you to talk it over.”
“Have you any particular reason
for wanting to see the deed, Mr. Hartington?”
the accountant asked, when Mr. Cox had left the room.
“I only ask because I suppose the documents
connected with the winding up of the bank must weigh
several tons, and it will take a considerable time
for a clerk to hunt out the one in question. If
you have really any motive for examining it I will
get it looked out for you by to-morrow, but it will
put us to a great deal of trouble.”
“I am really anxious to see
it for a special purpose, Mr. Wanklyn. I have
reason to believe there was some irregularity in the
matter.”
“I am afraid it will make but
little difference to you whether it was so or not,
Mr. Hartington. The creditors of the bank have
been the sufferers if there was any irregularity in
it.”
“Yes, I suppose so, and yet
I assure you it is not a mere matter of sentiment
with me. Other questions might turn upon it.”
“Then I will certainly have
it ready for you by to-morrow-give me until
the afternoon. Will four o’clock suit you?”
“Very well. I will, with
your permission, bring with me one of the attesting
witnesses to my father’s signature. He was
one of Mr. Brander’s clerks at the time.”
Mr. Wanklyn looked up keenly.
“You can bring whom you like,”
he said, after a pause, “and I will put a room
at your disposal, but of course the document cannot
be taken away.”
“Certainly not, Mr. Wanklyn,
and I am very much obliged to you for granting my
request.”
Cuthbert called for James Harford
at the hour at which he had said he went out to lunch,
and told him of the appointment he had made.
“I have been thinking it over,
Mr. Hartington, and I should recommend you to bring
Cooper with you.”
“Who is Cooper?”
“He is one of our greatest experts
on handwriting. I don’t know whether you
have any of your father’s letters in your possession.”
“Yes, I have several. I
brought over the last two I had from him, thinking
they might be useful.”
“Well, his opinion on the signatures
may be valuable, though as a rule experts differ so
absolutely that their evidence is always taken with
considerable doubt, but it is part of his business
to look out for erasures and alterations. It
is quite possible Brander may have removed that blot,
and that he has done it so well that neither you nor
I could detect it; but whether he did it with a knife
or chemicals you may be sure that Cooper will be able
to spot it, whichever he used. I have very little
doubt that your suspicions are correct and those parchments
were really the pretended mortgage deeds. If
you like I will go round and see Cooper at once and
arrange for him to meet us in Coleman Street to-morrow
at four o’clock.”
“Thank you very much. The
idea of the blot being erased had never struck me.”
The next day Cuthbert met James Harford
and Mr. Cooper at the door of the accountants, and
after being introduced by the clerk to the expert
they went up together. On giving his name in the
office a clerk came across to him.
“If you will come with me, gentlemen,
I will lead you to the room that is ready for you.
This is the document that you desire to see.”
As soon as they were alone they sat
down at the table, and opened the deed.
“How is it for size?” Cuthbert asked.
“It is about the same size,
but that is nothing. All deeds are on two or
three sizes of parchment. The last page is the
thing.”
Cuthbert turned to it. There
were but four lines of writing at the top of the page,
and below these came the signatures.
“Of course I could not swear
to it, Mr. Hartington, but it is precisely in accordance
with my recollection. There were either three,
four, or five lines at the top. Certainly not
more than five, certainly not less than three.
As you see there is no blot to my signature. Now,
Mr. Cooper, will you be kind enough to compare the
signatures of these two letters with the same name
there?”
Mr. Cooper took the letter and deed
to a desk by the window, examined them carefully,
then took out a large magnifying glass from his pocket,
and again examined them.
“I should say they are certainly
not by the same hand,” he said, decisively.
“I do not call them even good imitations.
They are nothing like as good as would be made by
any expert in signing other people’s names.
The tail of the ‘J’ in James in these two
letters runs up into the ‘a’ but as you
will notice the pen is taken off and the letter ‘a’
starts afresh. Here on the contrary you see the
pen has not been taken off, but the upstroke of the
‘J’ runs on continuously into the ‘a.’
More naturally it would be just the other way.
In these two letters the writer would be signing his
name more hurriedly than to a formal deed, and would
be much more likely to run his letters into each other
than when making a formal signature on parchment.
“Looking through this glass
you will observe also that although the letters run
on together there is a slight thickening in the upstroke
between each letter as if the writer had paused, though
without taking his pen off, to examine the exact method
of making the next letter in a copy lying before him.
In the surname there are half a dozen points of difference.
To begin with, the whole writing slopes less than in
the other signatures. In both your father’s
letters the cross of the first ‘t’ is
much lower than usual and almost touches the top of
the ‘r’ and i.’ The same peculiarity
is shown in the second ‘t’ in both letters,
while on the deed the ‘t’s’ are crossed
a good deal higher. The whole word is more cramped,
the flourish at the end of the ‘n’ is longer
but less free. In the capital letter, the two
downstrokes are a good deal closer together.
There has been the same pause between each letter as
those I pointed out in the Christian name, and indeed
the glass shows you the pen was altogether taken off
the paper between the ‘o’ and the ‘n,’
as the writer studied that final flourish. My
opinion is that it is not only a forgery but a clumsy
one, and would be detected at once by anyone who had
the original signatures before him. I will even
go so far as to say that I doubt if any bank clerk
well acquainted with Mr. Hartington’s signature
would pass it.”
“And now for the blot,”
Cuthbert said. “There was a blot somewhere
near the signature of Mr. Harford.”
“Don’t tell me where it
was, Mr. Harford. I would rather not know its
exact position.”
With the aid of the magnifying glass
the expert carefully examined the parchment and then
held it up to the light.
“The blot was in the middle
of the signature and involved the letters ‘a’
and ‘r.’ Is that right?”
“That is right, Mr. Cooper;
he used blotting paper to it at once, and it did not
show up very strongly.”
“An eraser has been used and
a chemical of some sort, and the two letters involved
in the blot have been re-written, or at any rate touched
up, but they have run a little. You can see it
quite plainly through this lens. The difference
between their outline and that of the other letters
is quite distinct, and by holding the parchment so
that the light falls across it, you can see that,
although it has been rubbed, probably by the handle
of a penknife to give it a gloss, the difference between
that gloss and the rest of the surface, is distinctly
visible.”
“I see that,” the clerk
said, “and I should be quite prepared to swear
now, Mr. Hartington, that this is the document I signed
some three weeks after I signed as witness to the
transfer.”
“That is quite good enough,
I think,” Cuthbert said. “Thank you,
Mr. Cooper, you have quite settled the doubt I had
in my mind. I do not think I shall have occasion
to ask you to go into court over this matter, but
should I have to do so I will, of course, give you
due notice.”
After paying the expert’s
fee Cuthbert went into the office and handed
the document over to the clerk from whom he had received
it.
“Would you kindly put it where
it can be got at easily should it be wanted again.
It is of the highest importance.”
After parting with Mr. Cooper at the
door, Cuthbert walked westward with Mr. Harford.
“So far you have proved that
your suspicions are correct, sir, and I have not the
least doubt that your father’s signature to the
transfer was, like this, a forgery. May I ask
what step you propose to take next? Of course
if your object was not to prevent publicity your course
would be clear. You would first apply for a warrant
for the arrest of Brander on a charge of double forgery.
When that was proved, you would have to take steps
to apply to have it declared that your father’s
name was wrongfully placed among the shareholders
of the bank, and then endeavor to obtain a decree
ordering the liquidator to reimburse the proceeds of
the sale of the estate and all other moneys received
by him from your father’s executor. Lastly,
you would apply to have the sale annulled, not only
on the ground of fraud on the part of Mr. Brander,
but because the liquidators could not give a title.
Of course in all these steps you would have to be
guided by a firm of high standing, but as you particularly
wish to avoid publicity, I suppose your first step
will be to confront Brander with the proofs of his
guilt. I suppose you would wish me to go down
with you. I shall be able to do so without difficulty,
for I took no holiday last year and can, therefore,
get two or three days whenever I choose to ask for
them.”
“Thank you, Mr. Harford.
It will certainly be desirable that I should be backed
up by your presence. The first thing I shall do
will be to go down to Abchester to see Dr. Edwardes.
I want to ascertain from him when he first knew of
my father having heart-disease. That he did know
it before his death I am aware, though, at my father’s
particular request, he abstained from informing me
of the fact. He may also know when Brander first
became acquainted with it. It will strengthen
my case much if I am in a position to show that it
was after he had the knowledge that my father’s
death might take place at any moment, that he committed
these frauds. As soon as I find this out, which
will probably be in a few hours after my arrival there,
I will send you a telegram. I am anxious to lose
no time, because I do not want Brander to know of my
arrival in Abchester until I confront him. If
I could find out what he did with the L15,000 he proved
to the liquidator that he had drawn out on the day
this mortgage was said to have been executed, I should
have the chain of evidence complete, but I don’t
see how that is to be got at.”
“It might be got at by advertisements,
Mr. Hartington; L15,000 is a large sum, and were you
to advertise a reward of L100 for information as to
whom Mr. Brander paid the sum of L15,000 on the date
named in the mortgage, it is quite probable you might
obtain the information.”
“I might get it that way, but
unless it is absolutely necessary I would rather not
do so. Were I to advertise before I see him, he
might have his attention drawn to it, and it would
put him on his guard. I can but resort to it
afterwards if he refuses to come to terms.”
Accordingly, the next day Cuthbert
went down to Abchester, travelling by a train that
arrived there after dark, and taking a fly, drove to
Dr. Edwardes’.
The servant took in his name and the
doctor at once hurried out into the hall.
“Why, my dear Cuthbert, I am
glad indeed to see you, though from your letter I
had hardly hoped to do so for some little time.
Come in, come in; my wife will be delighted to see
you. Dinner is just on the table, so you have
arrived at precisely the right moment.”
“Dear me, Mr. Hartington, you
are looking terribly ill,” Mrs. Edwardes exclaimed,
after the first greetings were over.
“I have been ill, but I am quite
convalescent now. I did rather a foolish thing,
Doctor. I joined a corps of Franc-tireurs raised
in the schools and studios, and the Germans put a
bullet through my body. It was a very near squeak
of it, but fortunately I was taken to the American
ambulance, which was far the best in Paris, and they
pulled me through. It is but ten days since I
was discharged cured, but of course it will be some
little time before I quite get up my strength again.”
“Where was it, Cuthbert?
Then you were fortunate indeed,” he went on,
as Cuthbert laid his finger on the spot; “the
odds were twenty to one against you. Did they
get the bullet out?”
“It went out by itself, Doctor.
We were at close quarters in the village of Champigny
when we made our sortie on the 1st of December, so
the ball went right through, and almost by a miracle,
as the surgeon said, without injuring anything vital.
There is the dinner-bell, Doctor. I will go into
your surgery and wash my hands. I remember the
ways of the place, you see.”
During dinner-time the talk was entirely
of the siege. When the meal was over, the doctor
and Cuthbert went to the former’s study, where
the doctor lighted a cigar and Cuthbert his pipe.
“How are they getting on at
Fairclose?” Cuthbert asked, carelessly.
The doctor shrugged his shoulders.
“I should say they heartily
regret having changed their quarters. Of course
it was her doing that they did so. She is a curious
mixture of cleverness and silliness. Her weak
point is her ambition to be in county society, and
to drop the town altogether. She has always been
hankering for that. No doubt it is partly for
the sake of the girls-at least she always
lays it to that. But when I used to attend them
as babies, she was always complaining to me that the
air of the town did not suit her. However, so
far from gaining by the exchange, she has lost.
“As the leading solicitor here,
and I may say the leading man in the place, Brander
went a good deal into the county. Of course his
wife did belong to a county family, and no doubt that
helped open the doors of many good houses to him.
Well, he is in the county now, but he is not of the
county. There was naturally a lot of bad feeling
about the smash of that bank. A good many men
besides yourself were absolutely ruined, and as everyone
banked there, there was scarce a gentleman in the county
or a tradesman in the town, who was not hit more or
less severely. The idea was that Brander, whose
name had been a tower of strength to the bank, had
been grossly negligent in allowing its affairs to get
into such a state. I think they were wrong, for
I imagine from what I heard, that Brander was correct
in saying that he was not in any way in the counsels
of the directors, but confined himself to strictly
legal business, such as investigating titles and drawing
up mortgages, and that he was only present at the
Board meetings when he was consulted on some legal
questions.
“Still there is no stemming
the tide of popular opinion. Abchester demanded
a scapegoat. Cumming had disappeared, the five
directors were ruined, and so they fell upon Brander.
He could have got over that-indeed he has
got over it as far as the town is concerned-but
his purchase of Fairclose set the county against him.
They considered that he got it for L20,000 below its
value, which was true enough; the other estates that
went into the market were all sold at an equal depreciation,
but it was felt somehow that he at least ought not
to have profited by the disaster, and altogether there
was so strong a feeling against him that the county
turned its back on Fairclose.”
“By the way, Doctor, can you
tell me when and how you first became aware of the
state of my father? The loss was so recent that
I asked but few questions about it when I was here,
though you told me that you had known it for some
little time.”
“I can give you the exact date,”
the doctor said, stretching out his hand for a book
on his desk. “Yes, here it is; it was the
23rd of March. His man rode down with the news
that he had found him insensible. Of course I
went up as hard as my horse could carry me. He
had recovered consciousness when I got there, and
his first request was that I should say nothing about
his illness. When I examined him, I found that
his heart was badly diseased, so badly that I told
him frankly he had not many weeks to live, and that,
as the slightest shock might prove fatal, I absolutely
forbade him to ride. He said he hated to be made
a fuss of. I urged him at least to let me write
to you, but he positively refused, saying that you
would be greatly cut up about it, and that he would
much rather go on as he was. The only exception
he made was Brander. He was the only soul to
whom I spoke of it. I called in and told him directly
I got back here and he went that afternoon to Fairclose.”
The date was conclusive to Cuthbert.
The transfer had been ante-dated some three weeks;
and the two clerks, therefore, attested it on the 24th
or 25th of March; so Brander had lost no time in conceiving
his plan and carrying it into execution.
“By the way, Doctor,”
he said, after a pause, “I shall be glad if you
will not mention to anyone that I am here. I don’t
want people to be coming to see me, and I would especially
rather not see Brander. I never did like the
man from the time I was a boy, and I don’t think
I could stand either his business manner or his hearty
one. I thought I would come down and have the
pleasure of a chat with you again for a day or two,
but I don’t mean to stir out while I am here.”
The next morning Cuthbert obtained
a telegraph form from the doctor and sent his man
with it to the post-office. It was directed to
Harford, and contained only the words, “Come
down this evening if possible. Put up at the
George. Come round in the morning to Dr. Edwardes.’”
Cuthbert was really glad of the day’s
rest, and felt all the better for it. On the
following morning Harford’s name was brought
in just as breakfast was over.
“It is the man who was Brander’s
clerk, Doctor,” he said. “I met him
in town and he has come down to see me on a little
matter of business.”
“Take him into the consulting-room,
Cuthbert, I am not likely to have any patients come
for the next half-hour.”
“That settles it, sir,”
the clerk said, when he heard from Cuthbert of the
date which he had obtained from the doctor, “though
I cannot swear to a day.”
“I hear that Brander comes to
his office about eleven o’clock. He is
sure to be there, for I hear that Jackson has gone
away for a few days. I will go at half-past.
If you will call here for me at that time we will
walk there together. I will go in by myself.
I will get you to call two or three minutes after
me, so that I can call you into his private room if
necessary.”
“You have soon done with him,”
the doctor said, as Cuthbert returned to the breakfast-room.
“I have given him some instructions
and he will call again presently,” Cuthbert
replied. “By the way, we were talking of
Brander; how have his two girls turned out? I
mean the two younger ones; I met Mary in Paris during
the siege.”
“Ah. I heard from Brander
that she was shut up there, and I was wondering whether
you had run against her. He is very savage at
what he calls her vagaries. Did she get through
the starvation all right?”
“Oh, yes, she was living in
a French family, and like most of the middle class
they had laid in a fair stock of provisions when it
became evident the place was to be besieged, and though
the supply of meat was stinted I don’t think
there was any lack of other things.”
“I liked Mary,” the doctor
said, warmly; “she was a straightforward, sensible
girl, till she got that craze about woman’s rights
in her mind; in all other respects she was a very
nice girl, and differed from the rest of them as much
as chalk from cheese.”
“And what are the sisters like?”
“They are like their mother,
vain and affected, only without her cleverness.
They feel bitterly their position at Fairclose, and
make matters worse by their querulous complainings.
I never go into the house unless I am sent for professionally,
for their peevishness and bad temper are intolerable.
If things had gone differently, and they had made
good marriages, they might have turned out pleasant
girls enough. As it is they are as utterly disagreeable
as any young women I ever came across.”
“Then Brander must have a very bad time of it.”
“Yes, but from what I have seen
when I have been there I don’t thing they show
off before him much. I fancy Brander’s temper
has not improved of late. Of course, in public,
he is the same as ever, but I think he lets himself
loose at home, and I should say that the girls are
thoroughly afraid of him. I have noticed anyhow
that when he is at home when I call, they are on their
best behavior, and there is not a word of any unpleasantness
or discontent from their lips. However, I suppose
the feeling against Brander will die out in time.
I think it was unjust, though I don’t say it
was not quite natural, but when the soreness wears
off a bit, people will begin to think they have been
rather hard on Brander. There’s the surgery
bell, now I must leave you to your own devices.”
At half-past eleven James Harford
called, and Cuthbert at once went out with him, and
they walked towards Mr. Brander’s office, which
was but a couple of hundred yards away.
“How do you do, Mr. Levison?”
Cuthbert asked as he entered. “Is Mr. Brander
alone?”
“Yes, he is alone, Mr. Hartington.
I am glad to see you again, sir.”
With a nod Cuthbert walked to the
door of the inner office, opened it, and went in.
Mr. Brander started, half rose from his chair with
the exclamation-
“My dear !” then he stopped.
There was something in the expression
of Cuthbert’s face that checked the words on
his lips.
“We need not begin with any
greetings, Mr. Brander,” Cuthbert said, coldly.
“I have come to tell you a story.”
“This is a very extraordinary
manner of address, Mr. Hartington,” the lawyer
said, in a blustering tone, though Cuthbert noticed
his color had paled, and that there was a nervous
twitching about the corners of his lips. Brander
had felt there was danger, and the blow had come so
suddenly that he had not had time to brace himself
to meet it. Without paying any attention to the
words, Cuthbert seated himself and repeated-
“I have come to tell you a story,
Mr. Brander. There was once a man who was solicitor,
agent, and friend of a certain land-owner. One
day he had heard from his client’s doctor that
he had had an attack of heart-disease and that his
life was only worth a few weeks’ purchase; also
that the landowner desired that an absolute silence
should be observed as to his illness. Then, like
another unjust steward, the lawyer sat down to think
how he could best turn an honest penny by the news.
It was rather a tough job; it would involve forgery
among other things, and there was a good deal of risk,
but by playing a bold game it might be managed.”
“What do you mean by this?”
the lawyer exclaimed, furiously.
“Calm yourself, Mr. Brander.
There is no occasion for you to fit the cap on to
your own head yet. If you think there is anything
in my story of a libellous nature you are at liberty
to call your two clerks in to listen to it. Well,
sir, the scheme this lawyer I am telling you about
worked out did credit to his genius-it
was complicated, bold, and novel. It happened
he was solicitor to a bank. He knew the bank was
hopelessly involved, that it could last but a few
weeks longer, and that its failure would involve the
whole of the shareholders in absolute ruin. If,
therefore, he were to contrive to place his client’s
name on the register of shareholders that point would
be achieved. Accordingly, having forms by him
he filled one up, forging the name of his client.
It would not have done to have had the date of the
transfer later than the seizure of that gentleman,
for manifestly no man, aware that he had but a few
days or weeks to live, would have entered on a fresh
investment. He, therefore, ante-dated the transfer
by some three weeks.
“As to the witnesses to the
forged signature there was no difficulty. He
waited for a few days till his client called upon him,
and then, after his departure, called in his two clerks,
who witnessed the signature as a matter of course,-an
irregular proceeding, doubtless, but not altogether
uncommon. That matter concluded he went to the
bank. It was above all things important that
none of the directors should be cognizant of his client
having been put on the register, as being friends
of that gentleman they might have mentioned the matter
to him when they met him. Having the manager
a good deal under his thumb, from his knowledge of
the state of affairs, he requested him to pass the
transfer with others at the next board meeting, in
such a way that it should be signed as a matter of
routine without the names being noticed, suggesting
that the manager should transfer some of the shares
he held. This little business was satisfactorily
performed and the name passed unnoticed on to the
register. There was one thing further to be done
in this direction, namely, that the bank should not
fail before the death of his client, and he therefore
requested the manager to let him know should there
be any pressure imminent on the bank’s resources,
offering to get some of the mortgages it held transferred,
and so to bolster up the bank for a considerable time.
As a matter of fact he did raise L20,000 in this manner,
and so kept the bank going until after his client’s
death, when he withdrew the offer, there being no longer
any occasion to keep it on its legs. You follow
this, I hope, Mr. Brander. It is interesting
for ingenuity and boldness.”
The lawyer made no reply. As
Cuthbert spoke the ruddy color on his cheeks had been
replaced by a ghastly pallor. An expression of
bewilderment had come across his face, the perspiration
stood out in big drops on his forehead.
“Thus far you see, Mr. Brander,”
Cuthbert went on, “the first part of the scheme
had been ably carried out, but it still remained to
reap the benefit of this ingenuity. In the first
place it was certain that the estate of his client
would, on the failure of the bank, come into the market.
Under such circumstances, and seeing there would be
widespread ruin in the county, the estate would fetch
far under its value. It would be advisable to
get it cheaper still, and this could be managed by
the production of a mortgage upon it, and by the invention
of a plausible tale to account for that mortgage having
been kept a secret even from the dead man’s
son. As to the deed itself, the matter was easy
enough; the document would only have to be drawn up
by himself, or in some office in London, the signature
of his client affixed as before and the two clerks
be called in to witness it.
“It would be necessary to satisfy
the official liquidator, however, who might make some
inquiries concerning it. It happened that some
time before the lawyer had had occasion to pay over
the sum of L15,000, as he would be able to prove by
his bank-book. Therefore, L15,000 was the sum
fixed upon for the mortgage, and the date of that document
was made to coincide with that of the payment of that
amount. It was easy enough to place among the
dead man’s papers receipts for the half-yearly
payment of this interest. It was not necessary
to show that his client had paid these sums by check,
as they would, of course, have been deducted from
the amount to be handed over by him as agent to his
client.
“The scheme worked admirably.
After the death of his client, the bank was allowed
to break, the estate fell into the hands of the official
receiver of the bank, the mortgage was presented, and
the proofs considered satisfactory. The lawyer
bought the estate for some L20,000 below its value,
and this with the mortgage brought the purchase money
down from L70,000 to half that sum. The story
is interesting, and if anyone should doubt it I am
in a position to prove it up to the hilt. I have
the sworn statement of the bank manager as to the particulars
of the interview with him, the injunction that the
transfer should be passed unnoticed, the offer to
support the bank, and the partial fulfilment of that
offer. I have the opinion of an expert that the
signature is not only a forgery but an exceedingly
clumsy one. I have the statement of one of the
clerks that the signature of both the transfer and
the mortgage was witnessed by him and his fellow-clerk
in obedience to the orders of the solicitor, but they
did not see the signature affixed.
“Lastly, I have a singular piece
of evidence that the mortgage was signed not on the
date it purported but shortly after the seizure of
the client. The clerk might have had some difficulty
in swearing that this mortgage was the document that
he signed, as the signatures were written on the last
sheet of the parchment, and he saw nothing of the contents.
But it happened that there were only four lines of
writing on that page, and there are four on the mortgage
in the hands of the official liquidator, but this
is not the crucial point. The clerk, in making
his signature, dropped a blot of ink on the parchment.
Now it was clear that this blot of ink might prove
the means o identifying this document and of proving
the time at which it was signed; therefore it was necesssary
that it should be erased. This the lawyer proceeded
to do and so cleverly that an unpracticed eye would
not detect it. The expert, however, though not
knowing where the blot had fallen, detected the erasure
at once, and noticed that in erasing it two of the
letters of the name had been involved, and these had
been retouched so as to make them the same darkness
as the rest. The chain of evidence is therefore
complete.”
The last blow had proved too crushing.
There was a sudden rush of blood to his face, and,
with a gasping sob, Mr. Brander fell back in his chair
insensible. Cuthbert ran to the door and opened
it.
“Mr. Levison, your employer
is taken ill. Send the other clerk to fetch Dr.
Edwardes at once, he will not have started on his rounds
yet. Bring some water in here.”
With the assistance of the clerk,
Cuthbert loosened the lawyer’s necktie and collar,
swept the papers off the table, and laid him upon it,
folding up his great coat and placing it under his
head.