No nation need have much difficulty
in producing a race of Wagnerian singers. With
the single exception of Handel, no composer has written
music so well calculated to make its singers vocal
athletes as Wagner. Abominably as the Germans
sing, it is astonishing how they thrive physically
on his leading parts. His secret is the Handelian
secret. Instead of specializing his vocal parts
after the manner of Verdi and Gounod for high sopranos,
screaming tenors, and high baritones with an effective
compass of about a fifth at the extreme tiptop of their
ranges, and for contraltos with chest registers
forced all over their compass in the manner of music
hall singers, he employs the entire range of the human
voice freely, demanding from everybody very nearly
two effective octaves, so that the voice is well exercised
all over, and one part of it relieves the other healthily
and continually. He uses extremely high notes
very sparingly, and is especially considerate in the
matter of instrumental accompaniment. Even when
the singer appears to have all the thunders of the
full orchestra raging against him, a glance at the
score will show that he is well heard, not because
of any exceptionally stentorian power in his voice,
but because Wagner meant him to be heard and took
the greatest care not to overwhelm him. Such
brutal opacities of accompaniment as we find in Rossini’s
Stabat or Verdi’s Trovatore, where the strings
play a rum-tum accompaniment whilst the entire wind
band blares away, fortissimo, in unison with the unfortunate
singer, are never to be found in Wagner’s work.
Even in an ordinary opera house, with the orchestra
ranged directly between the singers and the audience,
his instrumentation is more transparent to the human
voice than that of any other composer since Mozart.
At the Bayreuth Buhnenfestspielhaus, with the brass
under the stage, it is perfectly so.
On every point, then, a Wagner theatre
and Wagner festivals are much more generally practicable
than the older and more artificial forms of dramatic
music. A presentable performance of The Ring is
a big undertaking only in the sense in which the construction
of a railway is a big undertaking: that is, it
requires plenty of work and plenty of professional
skill; but it does not, like the old operas and oratorios,
require those extraordinary vocal gifts which only
a few individuals scattered here and there throughout
Europe are born with. Singers who could never
execute the roulades of Semiramis, Assur, and
Arsaces in Rossini’s Semiramide, could sing
the parts of Brynhild, Wotan and Erda without missing
a note. Any Englishman can understand this if
he considers for a moment the difference between a
Cathedral service and an Italian opera at Covent Garden.
The service is a much more serious matter than the
opera. Yet provincial talent is sufficient for
it, if the requisite industry and devotion are forthcoming.
Let us admit that geniuses of European celebrity are
indispensable at the Opera (though I know better,
having seen lusty troopers and porters, without art
or manners, accepted by fashion as principal tenors
at that institution during the long interval between
Mario and Jean de Reszke); but let us remember that
Bayreuth has recruited its Parsifals from the peasantry,
and that the artisans of a village in the Bavarian
Alps are capable of a famous and elaborate Passion
Play, and then consider whether England is so poor
in talent that its amateurs must journey to the centre
of Europe to witness a Wagner Festival.
The truth is, there is nothing wrong
with England except the wealth which attracts teachers
of singing to her shores in sufficient numbers to
extinguish the voices of all natives who have any talent
as singers. Our salvation must come from the
class that is too poor to have lessons.