Sometimes, for a moment, the curtain
of the past is rolled up, the seven seals of its book
are loosened, and we are allowed to know more of the
history than the round number of soldiers with which
a general crossed a river, or the succession that
brought one crazy voluptuary to follow another upon
the Imperial throne. We do not refuse gratitude
for what we ordinarily receive. To the general
it made all the difference whether he had a thousand
soldiers more or less, and to us it makes some.
To the Imperial maniac it was of consequence that
his predecessor in the government of civilised mankind
was slain before him, and for us the information counts
for something, too; just as one meets travellers who
satisfy an artistic craving by enumerating the columns
of a ruined shrine, and seeing that they agree with
the guidebook. But it is not often that historians
tell us what we really want to know, or that artists
will stoop to our questionings. We would willingly
go wrong over a thousand or two of those soldiers,
if we might catch the language of just one of them
as he waded into the river; and how many a simpering
Venus would we grind into face-powder if we could follow
for just one day the thoughts of a single priest who
once guarded her temple! But, occupied with grandeur
and beauty, the artists and historians move upon their
own elevated plane, and it is only by furtive glimpses
that we catch sight of the common and unclean underworld
of life, always lumbering along with much the same
chaotic noise of hungry desires and incessant labour,
of animalism and spiritual aspiration.
One such glimpse we are given in that
book of The Golden Ass, now issued by the Clarendon
Press, in Mr. H.E. Butler’s English version,
but hitherto best known through a chapter in Walter
Pater’s Marius, or by William Adlington’s
sixteenth century rendering, included among The
Tudor Translations. It is a strange and incoherent
picture that the book presents. Pater well compares
it to a dream: “Story within story stories
with the sudden, unlooked-for changes of dreams.”
And, as though to suit this dream-like inconsequence,
the scene is laid in Thessaly, the natural home of
witchcraft where, in fact, I was myself
laid under a witch’s incantation little more
than ten years ago, and might have been transformed
into heaven knows what, if a remembered passage from
this same book of Apuleius had not caused an outburst
of laughter that broke the spell only just in time.
It is a savage country, running into deep glens of
forest and precipitous defiles among the mountains,
fit haunt for the robber bands with which the few roads
were infested. The region where the Lucius of
the book wandered, either as man, or after his own
curiosity into mysterious things had converted him
into an ass (whereas he had wished to become a beautiful
bird) the region recalls some wild picture
of Salvator Rosa’s. We are surrounded
by gloomy shades, sepulchral caverns, and trees writhing
in storm, nor are cut-throat bandits ever far away.
Violence and murder threaten at every turn. Through
the narrow and filthy streets young noblemen, flown
with wine, storm at midnight. When a robber chief
is nailed through the hand to a door, his devoted
followers hew off his arm and set him free. They
capture girls for ransom, and sell them to panders.
When one is troublesome, they propose to sew her up
in the paunch of the yet living ass, and expose her
to the mid-day sun. One of the gang, disguised
as a bear, slays all his keepers, and is himself torn
in pieces by men and dogs. All the band are finally
slaughtered or flung from precipices. Gladiatorial
beasts are kept as sepulchres for criminals. A
slave is smeared with honey and slowly devoured by
ants till only his white skeleton remains tied to
a tree. A dragon eats one of the party, quite
cursorily. What with bears, wolves, wild boars,
and savage dogs, each step in life would seem a peril,
were not the cruelty of man more perilous still.
Continued existence in that region was, indeed, so
insecure, that men and women in large numbers ended
the torments of anxiety by cutting life short.
And then there were the witches, perpetually
adding to the uncertainty by rendering it dubious
in what form one might awake, if one awoke at all.
During sleep, a witch could draw the heart out through
a hole in the neck, and, stopping up the orifice with
a sponge, allow her victim to pine in wonder why he
felt so incomplete. With ointments compounded
of dead men’s flesh she could transform a lover
into a beaver, or an innkeeper into a frog swimming
in his own vat of wine and with doleful croak inviting
his former customers to drink; or herself, with the
aid of a little shaking, she could convert into a
feathered owl uttering a queasy note as it flitted
out of the window. Indeed, the whole of nature
was uncertain, especially if disaster impended, and
sometimes a chicken would be born without the formality
of an egg, or a bottomless abyss spurted with gore
under the dining-room table, or the wine began to
boil in the bottles, or a green frog leapt out of the
sheepdog’s mouth.
So life was a little trying, a little
perplexing; but it afforded wide scope for curiosity,
and Apuleius, an African, brought up in Athens, and
living in Rome, was endlessly curious. In his
attraction to horrors, to bloodshed, and the shudder
of grisly phantoms there was, perhaps, something of
the man of peace. It is only the unwarlike citizen
who could delight in imagining a brigand nurtured
from babyhood on human blood. He was, indeed,
writing in the very period which the historian fixed
upon as the happiest and most prosperous that the human
race has ever enjoyed those two or three
benign generations when, under the Antonines, provincials
combined with Romans in celebrating “the increasing
splendours of the cities, the beautiful face of the
country, cultivated and adorned like an immense garden,
and the long festival of peace, which was enjoyed
by so many nations, forgetful of their ancient animosities,
and delivered from the apprehension of future danger.”
The slow and secret poison that Gibbon says was introduced
by the long peace into the vitals of the Empire, was,
perhaps, among the causes that turned the thoughts
of Apuleius to scenes of violence and terror to
the “macabre,” as Pater said just
as it touched his style with the preciosity of decadence,
and prompted him to occupy a page with rapture over
the “swift lightnings” flashed against
the sunlight from women’s hair. He was,
in fact, writing for citizens much like the English
of twenty years ago, when the interest of readers,
protected from the harsh realities of danger and anxiety,
was flattered equally by bloodthirsty slaughters,
the shimmer of veiled radiance, and haunted byways
for access to the unknown gods.
Those byways to unknown gods were
much affected by Apuleius himself. The world
was at the slack, waiting, as it were, for the next
tide to flow, and seldom has religion been so powerless
or religions so many. Of one abandoned woman
it is told as the climax of her other wickednesses
that she blasphemously proclaimed her belief in one
god only. Apuleius seems to have been initiated
into every cult of religious mystery, and in his story
he exultingly shows us the dog-faced gods of Egypt
triumphing on the soil that Apollo and Athene
had blessed. Here was Anubis, their messenger,
and unconquered Osiris, supreme father of gods, and
another whose emblem no mortal tongue might expound.
So it came that at the great procession of Isis through
a Greek city the ass was at last able, after unutterable
sufferings, to devour the chaplet of roses destined
to restore him to human shape; and thereupon he took
the vows of chastity and abstinence (so difficult
for him to observe) until at length he was worthy
to be initiated into the mysteries of the goddess,
and, in his own words, “drew nigh to the confines
of death, trod the threshold of Proserpine, was borne
through all the elements, and returned to earth again,
saw the sun gleaming with bright splendour at dead
of night, approached the gods above and the gods below,
and worshipped them face to face.”
It was this redemption by roses, and
the initiation into virtue’s path, that caused
Adlington in his introduction to call the book “a
figure of man’s life, egging mortal men forward
from their asinal form to their human and perfect
shape, that so they might take a pattern to regenerate
their lives from brutish and beastly custom,”
And, indeed, the book is, in a wider sense, the figure
of man’s life, for almost alone among the writings
of antiquity it reveals to us every phase of that dim
underworld which persists, as we have supposed, almost
unnoticed and unchanged from one generation of man
to another, and takes little account either of government,
the arts, or the other interests of intellectual classes.
It is a world of incessant toil and primitive passion,
yet laughter has place in it, and Apuleius shows us
how two slave cooks could laugh as they peered through
a chink at their ass carefully selecting the choicest
dainties from the table; and how the whole populace
of a country town roared with delight at the trial
of a man who thought he had killed three thieves,
but had really pierced three wine skins; and how the
ass in his distress appealed unto Caesar for the rights
of a Roman citizen, but could get no further with his
best Greek than “O!” It is a world of violence
and obscenity and laughter, but, above all, a world
of pity. Virgil, too, was touched with the pity
of mortal things, but towards the poor and the labouring
man he rather affected a pastoral envy. Apuleius
had looked poverty nearer in the eyes, and he knew
the piteous terror on its face. To him we must
turn if we would know how the poor lived in the happiest
and most prosperous age that mankind has enjoyed.
In the course of his adventures, the ass was sold
to a mill a great flour factory employing
numerous hands and, with his usual curiosity,
he there observed, as he says, the way in which that
loathsome workshop was conducted:
“What stunted little men met my
eye, their skin all striped with livid scars, their
backs a mass of sores, with tattered patchwork clothing
that gave them shade rather than covering! ...
Letters were branded on their foreheads, their heads
were half shaven, iron rings were welded about their
ankles, they were hideously pale, and the smoky
darkness of that steaming, gloomy den had ulcerated
their eyelids: their sight was impaired, and
their bodies smeared and filthy white with the powdered
meal, making them look like boxers who sprinkle themselves
with dust before they fight.”
Even to animals the same pity for
their sufferings is extended a pity unusual
among the ancients, and still hardly known around the
Mediterranean. Yet Apuleius counted the sorrows
of the ill-used ass, and, speaking of the same flour
mill, he describes the old mules and pack-horses labouring
there, with drooping heads, their necks swollen with
gangrenes and putrid sores, their nostrils panting
with the harsh cough that continually racked them,
their chests ulcerated by the ceaseless rubbing of
their hempen harness, their hoofs swollen to an enormous
size as the result of their long journeys round the
mill, their ribs laid bare even to the bone by their
endless floggings, and all their hides rough with
the scab of neglect and decay.
The first writer of the modern novel first
of romanticists Apuleius has been called.
Romance! If we must keep those rather futile
distinctions, it is as the first of realists that we
would remember him. For, as in a dream, he has
shown us the actual life that mankind led in the temple,
the workshop, the market-place, and the forest, during
the century after the Apostles died. And we find
it much the same as the actual life of toiling mankind
in all ages full of unwelcome labour and
suffering and continual apprehension, haunted by ghostly
fears and self-imagined horrors, but illuminated by
sudden laughter, and continually goaded on by an inexplicable
desire to submit itself to that hard service of perfection
under which, as the priest of the goddess informed
Lucius in the story, man may perceive most fully the
greatness of his liberty.