OF SOME CASES IN WHICH THE CAUSTIC IS INAPPLICABLE.
It is by no means my intention to
recommend the application of the lunar caustic as
an infallible remedy for all local diseases. I
am quite aware of the propensity, in recommending
a favourite remedy, to extend its use beyond its true
limits. The caustic, like all other remedies,
requires to be employed with discrimination; and it
is therefore my object in this little work, to state
in which cases it is, and in which cases it is not,
useful and successful.
With this object, I have thought it
not improper to add, in a concluding chapter, some
observations on those cases in which I have found
the lunar caustic to be inadmissible. It will,
at the same time, be found that such cases, in the
course of their treatment by the ordinary measures,
not unfrequently become fit cases for the application
of the caustic, with the view of more speedily completing
the cure.
This observation is particularly applicable
to the cases of burns, of large ulcers, of fungous
ulcers, &c.
The caustic is inapplicable in extensive
lacerations, for the same reason that it is so in
extensive ulcers.
I have found the caustic of little
use in incised wounds, and should not employ it except
in such wounds received in dissection.
I have failed in my attempts to heal
scrofulous sores by the adherent eschar; I would propose
the trial with the lunar caustic and poultice.
In erysipelatous inflammation, where
vesicles are formed, the caustic does injury, as in
recent burns.
I have always found that the caustic
has done injury in boils, aggravating rather than
diminishing the affection.
1. Of Burns.
The application of the lunar caustic
in recent burns or scalds, has always appeared to
me to increase the inflammation and vesication, even
inducing blisters where there were none before.
The caustic must not, therefore, be applied in these
cases, until the inflammation has entirely subsided;
but when there remains only a small superficial ulceration,
the caustic may be passed lightly over the ulcerated
surface to form an eschar which is to be defended by
the gold-beater’s skin; for the affection is
then reduced to the state of a common superficial
ulcer. An adherent eschar is generally readily
formed, and no further application is required.
If the ulceration be more extensive and deeper, the
lunar caustic may be applied, and the eschar treated,
exactly as in common ulcers.
It may be well to illustrate these
points, by the following cases.
CASE XXXIII.
A little girl, aged 10, scalded her
breast a week ago and has treated it with the ordinary
remedies. There remained a superficial ulceration
of the size of half-a-crown. I applied the lunar
caustic lightly over the surface of the sore, and
then the gold-beater’s skin.
On the following day, an adherent
eschar had formed, and in five days more it dropped
off leaving the ulcer quite healed.
CASE XXXIV.
Mr. C. aged 51, scalded his leg ten
days ago on the instep. He applied ointments
and poultices. The surface remained ulcerated
to the extent of three inches in length and an inch
and a half in breadth, and presented a considerable
thick slough in the centre; the inflammation continued
to be considerable with some oedema towards the toes.
In such a case I should now recommend a cold poultice
to be applied for several days; but the present case
occurring early in my trials of the caustic, the latter
remedy was applied forthwith over both the ulcer and
slough.
On the following day I learnt that
the pain after the application of the caustic had
been considerable for two hours. It then ceased
and the eschar became complete; and there was rather
less inflammation and swelling. The patient had
kept in bed. I prescribed a pill with the hydrarg.
submurias, to be followed by an aperient draught.
On the succeeding day my patient went
down stairs and disturbed the eschar, and experienced
more pain. The inflammation and swelling were
still less. I applied the caustic to the parts
of the ulcer exposed by the injury done to the eschar.
During the two following days the
inflammation subsided entirely; I evacuated a little
fluid from beneath the eschar.
On the next day the eschar appeared
adherent, except in the centre which was occupied
by the slough.
On the succeeding day, I evacuated
a little fluid from beneath the slough.
On the next day I removed the slough
entirely by means of a pair of scissors. The
subjacent ulcer had a healthy granulated appearance.
I applied the lunar caustic to it to form an eschar.
From this time it was necessary to
evacuate a little fluid from under the eschar for
ten successive days. It then became adherent,
and in about a fortnight it separated, leaving the
ulcer healed.
CASE XXXV.
The following case will present a
specimen of my trials of the lunar caustic in larger
ulcers.
Anthony Knowles, aged 44, was kicked
by a horse on the leg, above the inner ankle, two
years ago. The part has never healed, but still
remains in the state of an open ulcer, attended by
some inflammation. When I first saw this ulcer
it was about two inches in diameter and nearly circular,
with high edges, a surface of a greenish colour, and
without any healthy granulations. I applied the
lunar caustic to form an eschar.
The pain from the caustic was severe
for several hours. An eschar had formed round
the edges, but in the middle part it was quite wanting;
the inflammation surrounding the ulcer had abated,
and the green hue of its surface had disappeared.
I reapplied the caustic in the central part.
On the following day the eschar appeared
tolerably complete in the centre but had separated
at one part of the circumference. I again applied
the caustic to the defective part.
On the following day the eschar was
defective in several parts, but the inflammation was
quite removed, there was no pain, and there had been
less smarting after each successive application of
the caustic. I again applied the caustic.
On the succeeding day, I learnt that
my patient had been intoxicated, and I found the ulcer
attended by inflammation. The eschar was by no
means complete; some part of it was in a detached state.
I removed the loose portions and repeated the application
of the caustic.
This sort of treatment was continued
for a fortnight without my being able to effect the
formation of a complete eschar. I therefore relinquished
the idea of healing the ulcer by the adherent eschar;
I eventually succeeded in doing so by applying the
caustic every third day and the poultice continually,
and I had hopes that the cure might be permanent,
but he made application to me in two years afterwards
with a similar ulcer on the same part.
In another similar case, I removed
the elevated hard edges of the ulcer by the lancet,
and then tried the caustic, without better success.
CASE XXXVI.
The last case I have to give is one
of great interest, as it clearly shows the influence
of the lunar caustic in subduing the inflammation
surrounding ulcerations, and in promoting the healing
process, even in cases of phagedenic ulcer. In
such cases its influence eminently deserves a still
further trial.
Mrs. H. aged 56, has had very extensive
phagedenic ulcerations on the legs and thighs during
three years, which began in little red spots and then
spread rapidly, destroying the integuments. One
of these ulcers, on the thigh, was twelve inches in
length and five in breadth, and exhibited the appearance
of a deep corroding furrow; it was surrounded by a
fiery redness and was attended by extreme pain.
There were many other ulcers of the same kind, several
nearly of the same magnitude; and the poor patient
was compelled to take large doses of laudanum several
times in the day. She had formerly been treated
for syphilis, and had afterwards taken the sarsaparilla
freely; amongst a great variety of local applications,
the white bread poultice had afforded most relief.
I applied the lunar caustic to two
of the smaller ulcers.
On the following day the eschars were
complete. I applied the caustic to the large
sore above described to the extent of three inches
square, avoiding its application on the inflamed skin.
On the next day I found the eschar
last made complete, and I passed the caustic over
the ulcer to the extent of three inches more.
On the succeeding day, the eschar
was complete, adherent at those edges which adjoined
the cuticle, and floating at the other edges over
the ulcer, and in the latter part allowing the escape
of matter; round the adherent edges of the eschar
the inflammation had entirely disappeared, while it
remained fiery as before round every other part of
the ulcer.
I continued my trials with the caustic
in this case, but it gave so much pain, and I had
so little hope of final success, that I altogether
relinquished the attempt to treat these ulcers by eschar.
Some of the small ulcers were healed, however, and
the larger one assumed a more healthy character wherever
the caustic had been applied. It may, therefore,
remain a question whether the lunar caustic may not
still prove useful in phagedenic ulcers of a smaller
size.