MAINWARING VS. MAINWARING
The case of Mainwaring versus Mainwaring
had been set for the opening of the December term
of court, being the first case on the docket.
The intervening weeks, crowded with preparation for
the coming litigation, had passed, and now, on the
eve of the contest, each side having marshalled its
forces, awaited the beginning of the fray, each alike
confident of victory and each alike little dreaming
of the end. From near and far was gathered an
array of legal talent as well as of expert testimony
seldom equalled, all for the purpose of determining
the validity or invalidity of a bit of paper-yellow
with age, time-worn and musty which stood as an insurmountable
barrier between Ralph Mainwaring and the fulfilment
of his long cherished project.
The Fair Oaks tragedy still remained
as deep a mystery as on the morning when, in all its
horror of sickening detail, it had startled and shocked
the entire community. No trace of the murderer
had been as yet reported, and even Mr. Whitney had
been forced to acknowledge in reply to numerous inquiries
that he had of late received no tidings whatever from
Merrick, either of success or failure.
Since the announcement of Harold Mainwaring
at the club that he would not touch a farthing of
the Mainwaring estate until not only his own name
should be cleared of the slightest imputation of murder,
but until the murder itself should be avenged, it had
been rumored that the party at the Waldorf was in
possession of facts containing the clue to the whole
mystery. Though this was mere conjecture, it
was plainly evident that whatever secrets that party
held in its possession were not likely to be divulged
before their time. The party had been augmented
by the arrival of the senior member of the firm of
Barton & Barton, while the register of the Waldorf
showed at that time numerous other arrivals from London,
all of whom proved to be individuals of a severely
judicial appearance and on extremely intimate terms
with the original Waldorf party. Of the business
of the former, however, or the movements of the latter,
nothing definite could be learned. Despatches
in cipher still flashed daily over the wires, but
their import remained a matter of the merest surmise
to the curious world outside.
Ralph Mainwaring, on the contrary,
since the arrival of his London attorneys, Upham and
Blackwell, with Graham, the well-known chirographical
expert, had seized every opportunity for rendering
himself and them as conspicuous as possible, while
his boasts of their well-laid plans, the strong points
in their case, and their ultimate triumph, formed
his theme on all occasions. Mr. Whitney’s
position at this time was not an enviable one, for
Ralph Mainwaring, having of late become dimly conscious
of a lack of harmony between himself and his New York
attorney, took special delight in frequently flouting
his opinions and advice in the presence of the English
solicitors; but that gentleman, mindful of a rapidly
growing account, wisely pocketed his pride, and continued
to serve his client with the most urbane courtesy,
soothing his wounded sensibilities with an extra fee
for every snub.
On the day prior to that set for the
opening of the trial, among the numerous équipages
drawn up at one of the piers, awaiting an incoming
ocean-liner, was the Mainwaring carriage, containing,
as usual, Ralph Mainwaring, Upham and Blackwell, and
Mr. Whitney. The carriage and its occupants
formed the centre of attraction to a considerable
portion of the crowd, until attention was suddenly
diverted by the sight of a stylish turnout in the
shape of an elegant trap and a pair of superb bays
driven tandem, which passed the Mainwaring carriage
and took its position at some distance nearer the pier.
Seated in the trap were Harold Mainwaring and Hugh
Mainwaring, junior. Their appearance together
at that particular time and place excited no little
wonder and comment, especially when, the gangplank
having been thrown down, the young men left the turnout
in care of a policeman and walked rapidly towards
the hurrying stream of passengers, followed more slowly
by Ralph Mainwaring and his party.
All was explained a few moments later,
as that embodiment of geniality, William Mainwaring
Thornton, loomed up in the crowd, his daughter upon
one arm, upon the other Miss Carleton, and accompanied
by Mrs. Hogarth and the usual retinue of attendants.
“Looks like a family reunion,
by George!” exclaimed one of the on-lookers,
as a general exchange of greetings ensued, but to a
close observer it was evident that between some members
of the different parties the relations were decidedly
strained. No so with Mr. Thornton, however;
his first greetings were for the young men.
“Well, well, Hugh, you contumacious
young rascal! how are you? I hear you’ve
kicked over the traces and set the governor and his
sovereigns at defiance! Well, you’ve shown
yourself a Mainwaring, that’s all I have to
say! Here is a young lady, however, who is waiting
to give you a piece of her mind; you’ll have
to settle with her.”
“Papa!” exclaimed Edith
Thornton in faint protest, her fair face suffused
with blushes as she came forward to meet her lover,
while her father turned towards Harold Mainwaring.
“Well, my dear sir,” he
said, extending his hand with the utmost cordiality,
“I am glad to meet you in your own proper sphere
at last; I always thought you were far too good looking
for a secretary! But, joking aside, my dear boy,
let me assure you that as the son of Harold Scott
Mainwaring, one of the most royal fellows I ever knew,
I congratulate you and wish you success.”
Deeply touched by Mr. Thornton’s
kindness and his allusion to his father, the young
man thanked him with considerable emotion.
“That is all right,” the
elder man responded heartily; “I was very sorry
not to have met you in London, but I heard the particulars
of your story from Winifred, and well,
I consider her a very level-headed young woman, and
I think you are to be congratulated on that score
also.”
“No one is better aware of that
fact than I,” said the young man, warmly, and
passed on to meet the young ladies, while Mr. Thornton
turned to confront the frowning face of Ralph Mainwaring.
“Hello, Mainwaring! What’s
the matter? You look black as a thunder-cloud!
Did you have something indigestible for luncheon?”
“Matter enough I should say,”
growled the other, unsuccessfully trying to ignore
Mr. Thornton’s outstretched hand, “to find
you hobnobbing with that blackguard!”
Mr. Thornton glanced over his shoulder
at the young people with a comical look of perplexity.
“Well, you see how it is yourself, Mainwaring:
what is a fellow to do? This is a house divided
against itself, as it were, and no matter what my
personal sentiments towards you might be, I find myself
forced to maintain a position of strict neutrality.”
“Neutrality be damned! you
had better maintain better parental government in
your own family!”
“As you do in yours, for instance.”
“You know very well,”
continued Ralph Mainwaring, flushing angrily, “that
if you had forbidden Edith marrying Hugh under present
conditions, he would have got down off his high horse
very quickly.”
“That is something I would never
do,” Mr. Thornton replied, calmly, “for
two reasons; first, I have never governed my daughter
by direct commands and prohibitions, and, second,
I think just as much of Hugh Mainwaring without his
father’s money as with it; more, if it is to
be accompanied with the conditions which you imposed.”
“Then am I to understand,”
demanded the other, angrily, “that you intend
to go against me in this matter?”
“My dear Mainwaring,”
said Mr. Thornton, much as he would address a petulant
child, “this is all the merest nonsense.
I am not going against you, for I have no part in
this contest; my position is necessarily neutral;
but if you want my opinion of the whole matter, I
will tell you frankly that I think, for once in your
life, you have bitten off more than you can swallow,
and you will find it so before long.”
“Perhaps it might be just as
well to reserve your opinion till it is called for,”
the other answered, shortly.
“All right,” returned
Mr. Thornton, with imperturbable good humor; “but
any time that you want to wager a thousand or so on
the outcome of this affair, remember the money is
ready for you!”
The conversation changed, but Ralph
Mainwaring was far more chagrined and annoyed than
he would have acknowledged. Mr. Thornton’s
words rang in his ears till they seemed an augury of
defeat, and, though outwardly as dogged and defiant
as ever, he was unable to banish them, or to throw
off the strange sense of depression which followed.
Meanwhile, amid the discordant elements
surrounding them, Harold Mainwaring and Winifred Carleton
found little opportunity for any but the most desultory
conversation, but happily there was little need for
words between them. Heart can speak to heart
through the subtle magnetism of a hand-clasp, or the
swift flash from eye to eye, conveying meanings for
which words often prove inadequate.
“You wrote that you were confident
of victory, and your looks bear it out,” she
said, ’with a radiant smile; “but I would
have come just the same, even had there been no hope
of success for you.”
“I need no assurance of your
faith and loyalty,” he replied, gazing tenderly
into her luminous eyes, “but your coming will
make my triumph ten times sweeter.”
“Of course you will spend the
evening with, us at our hotel, uncle cabled
for apartments at the Savoy, and I am all
impatience to learn whatever you are at liberty to
tell me concerning your case, for there must have
been some wonderful developments in your favor soon
after your arrival in this country, you have seemed
so much more hopeful; and do not let me forget, I
have something to show you which will interest you.
It is a written statement by Hugh Mainwaring himself
regarding this identical will that is causing all this
controversy.”
“A statement of Hugh Mainwaring’s!”
Harold repeated in astonishment; “how did it
come into your possession?”
“That is the strangest part
of it,” she replied, hurriedly, for they had
now reached the carriages in waiting for them.
“I received it through the mail, from America,
a few days before I left London, and from you
cannot imagine whom Mr. Merrick, the detective.
How he ever knew my address, or how he should surmise
that I was particularly interested in you,”
she blushed very prettily with these words, “is
more than I can understand, however.”
“I think I can explain that
part of it,” said Harold, with a smile; “but
how such a statement ever came into his hands is a
mystery to me. I will see you this evening without
fail,” and, assisting Miss Carleton into the
carriage, he bade her au revoir, and hastened
to rejoin young Mainwaring.
That evening witnessed rather a novel
reception in the private parlors of the Savoy; both
parties to the coming contest being entertained by
their mutual friends. When Harold Mainwaring
finally succeeded in securing a tete-a-tete conversation
with Miss Carleton, she placed in his hands a small
packet, saying,
“You will find in this the statement
of which I spoke to you, and I wish you would also
read the accompanying note, and explain how the writer
came to have so good an understanding of the situation.”
With eager haste he drew forth a sheet
of paper little less time-worn and yellowed than the
ancient will itself, upon which was written, in the
methodical business hand with which he was so familiar,
a brief statement to the effect that a certain accompanying
document described as the last will and testament
of Ralph Maxwell Mainwaring had been drawn and executed
as such on the night preceding his death, its intent
and purpose being to reconvey to an elder son the
family estate, to which he had previously forfeited
all right and title; that efforts made to communicate
with the beneficiary had proved unavailing, as he
had left the country and his place of residence was
unknown. Then followed Hugh Mainwaring’s
signature. At the bottom of the page, however,
was a foot-note of much later date, which put a different
complexion on the foregoing, and which read as follows:
“It has now been ascertained
for a certainty that the beneficiary mentioned in
the accompanying will is no longer living. I
have, therefore, a clear title to the estate, as it
would revert to me at his death. The document
itself is worthless, except as a possible means of
silencing that scoundrel, Hobson, should he attempt
to reveal anything of the past, as he has threatened
to do, and for this purpose I shall retain it in my
possession until such time as I make final adjustment
of my affairs.
“HughMainwaring.”
“Ah,” said Harold Mainwaring,
thoughtfully, as he suddenly recalled the morning
when he had discovered Merrick and his assistant dragging
the lake at Fair Oaks, “I think I understand
how this paper came into Merrick’s possession.
It was evidently kept in the same receptacle which
held the will, but in my haste and excitement at the
discovery of the will I must have overlooked it.
The box in which these papers were kept afterwards
fell into Merrick’s hands, and he must have
found this.”
“That solves one riddle, here
is the other,” and Miss Carleton handed her
lover a small note, covered with a fine, delicate
chirography whose perfectly formed characters revealed
a mind accustomed to the study of minute details and
appreciative of their significance. He opened
it and read the following:
“My dear miss Carleton:
“Pardon the liberty I take,
but, thinking the enclosed bit of paper might be of
some possible assistance to one in whose success I
believe you are deeply interested, I send it herewith,
as, for obvious reasons, I deem this circuitous method
of transmission better than one more direct.
“As when taking leave of you
on board the ‘Campania,’ so now, permit
me to assure you that if I can ever serve you as a
friend, you have but to command me.
“Most
sincerely yours,
“C.
D. Merrick.”
A smile of amusement lighted Harold
Mainwaring’s face as, glancing up from the note,
his eyes met those of Miss Carleton’s with their
expression of perplexed inquiry.
“This is easily explained,”
he said; “do you remember the tall, slender
man whom we observed on board the ‘Campania’
as being rather unsocial and taciturn?”
“Yes, I remember he rather annoyed
me, for I fancied he concentrated considerably more
thought and attention upon us than the circumstances
called for.”
“Which shows you were more observing
than I. Such a thought never entered my mind till
I had been about ten days in London, when it occurred
to me that, considering the size of the town and the
fact that he and I were strangers, we met with astonishing
frequency. I have since learned that he was
a detective sent over to London on an important case,
and being an intimate friend of Merrick’s, the
latter, who, I am informed, was shadowing me pretty
closely at the time, requested him to follow my movements
and report to him, which he evidently did, as I have
since heard that Merrick had expressed to one or two
that he was not at all surprised by the developments
which followed my return to this country. Consequently,
it is not to be wondered at if he has an inkling that
you may be somewhat interested in this case.”
“But what could have been Mr.
Merrick’s object in shadowing you?”
“I cannot say. It may
have been only part of his professional vigilance
in letting nothing escape his observation; but from
the first I was conscious of his close espionage of
my movements. Now, however, I am satisfied that
he had none but friendly intentions, and I appreciate
his kindness, not only towards myself, but more especially
towards you.”
“Will that statement be of any
assistance to you, do you think?”
“I hardly think so under our
present plans,” he replied, after a moment’s
reflection; “under recent developments our plans
differ so radically from what we first intended, that
we will probably have little use for any of the testimony
which we had originally prepared.”
“But these recent developments
which have so changed your plans must certainly have
been in your favor and have rendered your success
the more assured, have they not?”
“Not only more assured, but
more speedy and complete. To me, the coming
trial means far more than the settlement of the controversy
over the estate; it means the complete and final vindication
of my character, so that I can stand before you and
before the world acquitted of every charge which my
enemies would have sought to bring against me.”
Her face grew radiant with sympathy.
“I well know what that means to you, and I
would be first to congratulate you on such a victory,
for your own sake; but I needed no public acquittal
to convince me of your innocence, not even,”
she added, slowly, “when you yourself for some
reason, which I hope one day to understand, were unable
to assure me of it.”
His dark eyes, glowing with suppressed
feeling, met hers, the intensity of their gaze thrilling
her heart to its inmost depths.
“Do not think that I can ever
forget that,” he said in low tones which seemed
to vibrate through her whole being; “do not think
that through any triumphs or joys which the future
may bring, I can ever forget, for one moment, the
faith and love which stood loyally by me in my darkest
hour, the hour when the shadow of the crime,
which has forever darkened Fair Oaks, was closing about
my very soul!”
Startled at the sudden solemnity of
his words and manner, she remained silent, her eyes
meeting his without a shade of doubt or distrust,
but full of wondering, tender inquiry, to which he
replied, while for an instant he laid his hand lightly
and caressingly on hers, “Only a few days longer,
love, and I will tell you all!”
On the morning of the following day
a dense crowd awaited, at an early hour, the opening
of the December term of court; a crowd which was steadily
augmented till, when the case of Mainwaring versus
Mainwaring was called, every available seat was filled.
All parties to the suit were promptly on hand, and
amid a silence almost oppressive, proponent and contestant,
with their counsel and witnesses, passed down the
long aisle to their respective places.
Seldom had the old court-room, in
its long and varied history, held so imposing an array
of legal talent as was assemble that morning within
its walls. The principal attorneys for the contestant
were Hunnewell & Whitney of New York, and the London
firm of Upham & Blackwell, while grouped about these
were a number of lesser luminaries, whose milder rays
would sufficiently illumine the minor points in the
case. But at a glance it was clearly evident
that the galaxy of legal lights opposing them contained
only stars of the first magnitude. Most prominent
among the latter were Barton & Barton, of London,
with Mr. Sutherland and his life-long friend and coadjutor,
M. D. Montague, with whom he had never failed to take
counsel in cases of special importance, all men of
superb physique and magnificent brains; while slightly
in the rear, as reinforcements, were the Hon. I. Ponsonby
Roget, Q.C., another Q.C. whose name had not yet reached
the public ear, and a Boston jurist whose brilliant
career had made his name famous throughout the United
States.
Prominent among the spectators were
Mr. Scott and Mr. Thornton, apparently on the best
of terms, and watching proceedings with demonstrations
of the liveliest interest, while seated at a little
distance, less demonstrative, but no less interested,
was young Mainwaring, accompanied by Miss Thornton
and Miss Carleton.
The first day was devoted to preliminaries,
the greater part of the time being consumed in the
selection of a jury. One after another of those
impaneled was examined, challenged by one side or
the other, and dismissed; not until the entire panel
had been exhausted and several special venires issued,
was there found the requisite number sufficiently
unprejudiced to meet the requirements of the situation.
The remainder of the day was occupied
by counsel for contestant in making the opening statement.
A review of the grounds upon which the contest was
based was first read by one of the assistant attorneys,
after which Mr. Whitney followed with a lengthy statement
which occupied nearly an hour. He reviewed in
detail the circumstances of the case, beginning with
the death of Hugh Mainwaring, and laying special stress
upon his irreproachable reputation. He stated
that it would be shown to the jury that the life of
Hugh Mainwaring had been above suspicion, an irrefutable
argument against the charges of fraud and dishonesty
which had been brought against him by those who sought
to establish the will in contest. It would also
be shown that the said document was a forgery, the
result of a prearranged plan, devised by those who
had been lifelong enemies of Hugh Mainwaring and the
contestant, to defraud the latter of his rights, and
to obtain possession of the Mainwaring estate; and
that the transparency of the device in bringing the
so-called will to light at that particular time and
under those particular circumstances was only too plainly
evident.
Mr. Whitney was warming with his subject,
but at this juncture he was peremptorily called to
order by Mr. Sutherland, who stated that he objected
to counsel making an argument to the jury, when he
should confine himself simply to an opening statement.
Mr. Whitney’s face flushed as a ripple of amusement
ran through the courtroom, but the objection was sustained,
and, after a brief summary of what the contestant
proposed to show, he resumed his seat, and the court
then adjourned until the following morning.
The first testimony introduced on
the following day was to establish the unimpeachable
honesty and integrity of the deceased Hugh Mainwaring.
Both Mr. Elliot and Mr. Chittenden were called to
the stand, and their examination particularly
the cross-examination, in which a number of damaging
admissions were made occupied nearly the
entire forenoon; the remainder of the day being devoted
to the testimony of witnesses from abroad, introduced
to show that for years a bitter estrangement had existed
between Frederick Mainwaring Scott, the alleged foster-father
of the proponent, and the members of the Mainwaring
family, the deceased Hugh Mainwaring and
the contestant in particular; and also to show the
implacable anger of Ralph Maxwell Mainwaring against
his elder son and the extreme improbability of his
ever relenting in his favor.
Day after day dragged slowly on, still
taken up with the examination of witnesses for contestant;
examinations too tedious and monotonous for repetition,
but full of interest to the crowds which came and
went, increasing daily, till, on the days devoted to
the expert testimony, galleries and aisles were packed
to overflowing, while throngs of eager listeners gathered
in the corridors about the various exits.
It soon became evident that Ralph
Mainwaring’s oft repeated assertions concerning
the elaborate preparation he had made for the coming
contest were no idle boast. Nothing that human
ingenuity could devise had been left undone which
could help to turn the scale in his own favor.
The original will of Ralph Maxwell Mainwaring, by
which his elder son was disinherited, was produced
and read in court. Both wills were photographed,
and numerous copies, minute in every detail, made,
in order to show by comparison the differences in
their respective signatures. Under powerful
microscopes it was discovered that several pauses had
been made in the signature of the later will.
Electric batteries were introduced to show that the
document had been steeped in coffee and tobacco juice
to give it the appearance of great age. Interesting
chemical experiments were performed, by which a piece
of new paper was made to look stained and spotted
as if mildewed and musty, while by the use of tiny
files and needles, the edges, having first been slightly
scalloped, were grated and the paper punctured, till
it presented a very similar aspect to the will itself
as though worn through at the creases and frayed and
tattered with age.
But the accumulation of this overwhelming
mass of expert testimony failed to make the impression
upon counsel for proponent which had been anticipated
by the other side. Mr. Sutherland varied the
monotony of the direct examinations by frequent and
pertinent objections, while Barton & Barton took occasional
notes, which were afterwards passed to Sutherland
and Montague, and by them used with telling effect
in the cross-examinations, but the faces of one and
all wore an expression inscrutable as that of the sphinx.
Only once was their equanimity disturbed
by any ripple of agitation, and then the incident
was so little understood as to be soon forgotten.
As the third day of the trial was drawing to a close,
a despatch in cipher was handed Mr. Sutherland, which
when translated seemed to produce a startling effect
upon its readers. Barton & Barton exchanged
glances and frowned heavily; Mr. Sutherland’s
face for one brief moment showed genuine alarm, and
Harold Mainwaring, upon reading the slip of paper
passed to him, grew pale. A hurried consultation
followed and Mr. Montague left the court-room.
On the following morning the papers
announced that at 11 P.M. the preceding night, the
Victoria, the private car of the president of one
of the principal railway lines, with special engine
attached, had left for the West, evidently on business
of great importance, as everything on the road had
been ordered side-tracked. It was stated that
no particulars could be ascertained, however, regarding
either her passengers or her destination, the utmost
secrecy being maintained by those on board, including
even the trainmen. This item, though attracting
some attention, caused less comment than did the fact
that for the three days next ensuing, neither the
senior Mr. Barton nor Mr. Montague was present in court;
but no one suspected any connection between the two
events, or dreamed that the above gentlemen, with
two of New York’s most skilled surgeons, were
the occupants of the president’s private car,
then hastening westward at almost lightning speed.
On the afternoon of the sixth day
of the trial, as it became apparent that the seemingly
interminable evidence submitted by contestant was
nearly at an end, the eager impatience of the waiting
crowd could scarcely be restrained within the limits
of order. A change was noticeable also in the
demeanor of proponent and his counsel. For the
two days preceding they had appeared as though under
some tension or suspense; now they seemed to exhibit
almost an indifference to the proceedings, as though
the outcome of the contest were already a settled
fact, while a marked gravity accompanied each word
and gesture.
At last the contestant rested, and
all eyes were fixed upon Mr. Sutherland, as, after
a brief pause, he rose to make, as was supposed, his
opening statement. Instead of addressing the
jury, however, he turned towards Judge Bingham.
“Your honor,” he began,
in slow, measured tones, “it now lacks but little
more than an hour of the usual time for adjournment,
and after the constant strain which has been put upon
our nerves for the past six days, I feel that none
of us, including yourself, your honor, are in a sufficiently
receptive mood to listen to the testimony which the
proponent has to offer. In addition to this
is the fact that our most important witness is not
present this afternoon. I would therefore ask
for an adjournment to be taken until ten o’clock
next Monday morning, at which time I will guarantee
your honor and the gentlemen of the jury that the
intricate and elaborate web of fine-spun theories which
has been presented will be swept away in fewer hours
than the days which have been required for its construction.”
There was an attempt at applause,
which was speedily checked, and without further delay
the court adjourned.
As judge, jury, and counsel took their
respective places on the following Monday at the hour
appointed, the scene presented by the old court-room
was one never before witnessed in its history.
Every available inch of standing room, both on the
main floor and in the galleries, was taken; throngs
were congregated about the doorways, those in the
rear standing on chairs and benches that they might
obtain a view over the heads of their more fortunate
neighbors, while even the recesses formed by the enormous
windows were packed with humanity, two rows deep,
the outer row embracing the inner one in its desperate
efforts to maintain its equilibrium.
The opposing sides presented a marked
contrast in their appearance that morning. Ralph
Mainwaring betrayed a nervous excitement very unusual
in one of his phlegmatic temperament; his face alternately
flushed and paled, and though much of the old defiant
bravado remained, yet he awaited the opening of proceedings
with visible impatience. Nor was Mr. Whitney
less excited, his manner revealing both agitation
and anxiety. On the part of Harold Mainwaring
and his counsel, however, there was no agitation,
no haste; every movement was characterized by composure
and deliberation, yet something in their bearing something
subtle and indefinable but nevertheless irresistible impressed
the sensibilities of the vast audience much as the
oppressive calm which precedes an electric storm.
All felt that some great crisis was at hand, and it
was amid almost breathless silence that Mr. Sutherland
arose to make his opening statement.
“Gentlemen of the jury,”
he began, and the slow, resonant tones penetrated
to the farthest corner and out into the corridors where
hundreds were eagerly listening, “as a defence
to the charges sought to be established in your hearing,
we propose to show, not by fine-spun theories based
upon electrical and chemical experiments, nor brilliant
sophistries deduced from microscopic observations,
but by the citation of stubborn and incontrovertible
facts, that this document (holding up the will), copies
of which you now have in your possession, is the last
will and testament of Ralph Maxwell Mainwaring, executed
by him on the night preceding his death, and as such
entitled to stand; that this will, from the date of
its execution to the day of its discovery on the seventh
of July last, was wilfully and fraudulently withheld
from publication, and its existence kept secret by
the deceased Hugh Mainwaring. That the proponent,
Harold Scott Mainwaring, is the lawful and only son
of the beneficiary named therein, and as such the
sole rightful and lawful heir to and owner of the
Mainwaring estate. More than this, we propose
at the same time and by the same evidence to forever
disprove, confute, and silence any and every aspersion
and insinuation which has been brought against the
character of the proponent, Harold Scott Mainwaring;
and in doing this, we shall at last lift the veil
which, for the past five months, has hung over the
Fair Oaks tragedy.”
Mr. Sutherland paused to allow the
tremendous excitement produced by his words to subside;
then turning, he addressed himself to the judge.
“Your honor, I have to request
permission of the court to depart in a slight degree
from the usual custom. The witness for the defence
is in an adjoining room, ready to give testimony when
summoned to do so, but in this instance I have to
ask that the name be withheld, and that the witness
himself be identified by the contestant and his counsel.”
The judge bowed in assent, and amid
a silence so rigid and intense as to be almost painful,
at a signal from Mr. Sutherland, the doors of an anteroom
were swung noiselessly open and approaching footsteps
were heard.