INTRODUCING MR. DANIEL HARWOOD

On the day following the delivery to Andrew Kelton of the letter in which money for Sylvia’s education was offered by an unknown person, the bearer of the message was to be seen at Indianapolis, in the law office of Wright and Fitch, attorneys and counselors at law, on the fourth floor of the White River Trust Company’s building in Washington Street.  In that office young Mr. Harwood was one of half a dozen students, who ran errands to the courts, kept the accounts, and otherwise made themselves useful.

Wright and Fitch was the principal law firm in the state in the period under scrutiny, as may readily be proved by an examination of the court dockets.  The firm’s practice was, however, limited.  Persons anxious to mulct wicked corporations in damages for physical injuries did not apply to Wright and Fitch, for the excellent reason that this capable firm was retained by most of the public service corporations and had no time to waste on the petty and vexatious claims of minor litigants.  Mr. Wright was a Republican, Mr. Fitch a Democrat, and each of these gentlemen occasionally raised his voice loud enough in politics to emphasize his party fealty.  In the seventies Mr. Wright had served a term as city attorney; on the other hand, Mr. Fitch had once declined the Italian ambassadorship.  Both had been mentioned at different times for the governorship or for the United States Senate, and both had declined to enter the lists for these offices.

Daniel Harwood had been graduated from Yale University a year before we first observed him, and though the world lay before him where to choose, he returned to his native state and gave himself to the study of law by day and earned a livelihood by serving the “Courier” newspaper by night.  As Mr. Harwood is to appear frequently in this chronicle, it may be well to summarize briefly the facts of his history.  He was born on a farm in Harrison County, and his aversion to farm life had been colored from earliest childhood by the difficulties his father experienced in wringing enough money out of eighty acres of land to buy food and clothing and to pay taxes and interest on an insatiable mortgage held somewhere by a ruthless life insurance company that seemed most unreasonably insistent in its collections.  Daniel had two older brothers who, having satisfied their passion for enlightenment at the nearest schoolhouse, meekly enlisted under their father in the task of fighting the mortgage.  Daniel, with a weaker hand and a better head, and with vastly more enterprise, resolved to go to Yale.  This seemed the most fatuous, the most profane of ambitions.  If college at all, why not the State University, to support which the Harwood eighty acres were taxed; but a college away off in Connecticut!  There were no precedents for this in Harrison County.  No Harwood within the memory of man had ever adventured farther into the unknown world than to the State Fair at Indianapolis; and when it came to education, both the judge of the Harrison County Circuit Court and the presiding elder of the district had climbed to fame without other education than that afforded by the common schools.  Daniel’s choice of Yale had been determined by the fact that a professor in that institution had once addressed the county teachers, and young Harwood had been greatly impressed by him.  The Yale professor was the first graduate of an Eastern university that Daniel had ever seen, and he became the young Hoosier’s ideal of elegance and learning.  Daniel had acquired at this time all that the county school offered, and he made bold to approach the visitor and ask his advice as to the best means of getting to college.

We need not trace the devious course by which, after much burning of oil during half a dozen winters, Dan Harwood attained to a freshman’s dignity at New Haven, where, arriving with his effects in a canvas telescope, he had found a scholarship awaiting him; nor need we do more than record the fact that he had cared for furnaces, taken the night shift on a trolley car, and otherwise earned money until, in his junior year, his income from newspaper correspondence and tutoring made further manual labor unnecessary.  It is with profound regret that we cannot point to Harwood as a football hero or the mainstay of the crew.  Having ploughed the mortgaged acres, and tossed hay and broken colts, college athletics struck him as rather puerile diversion.  He would have been the least conspicuous man in college if he had not shone in debate and gathered up such prizes and honors as were accessible in that field.  His big booming voice, recognizable above the din in all ’varsity demonstrations, earned for him the sobriquet of “Foghorn” Harwood.  For the rest he studied early and late, and experienced the doubtful glory, and accepted meekly the reproach, of being a grind.

History and the dismal science had interested him immensely.  His assiduous attention to the classes of Professor Sumner had not gone unnoticed by that eminent instructor, who once called him by name in Chapel Street, much to Dan’s edification.  He thought well of belles-lettres and for a time toyed with an ambition to enrich English literature with contributions of his own.  During this period he contributed to the “Lit” a sonnet called “The Clam-Digger” which began: ­

     At rosy dawn I see thine argosy;

and which closed with the invocation: ­

     Fair tides reward thy long, laborious days.

The sonnet was neatly parodied in the “Record,” and that journal printed a gratuitous defense of the fisherman at whom, presumably, the poem had been directed.  “The sonnet discloses nothing,” said the “Record,” “as to the race, color, or previous condition of servitude of the unfortunate clammer to justify a son of Eli in attacking a poor man laudably engaged in a perfectly honorable calling.  The sonneteer, coming, we believe, from the unsalt waters of the Wabash, seems to be unaware that the fisherman at whom he has leveled his tuneful lyre is not seeking fair tides but clams.  We therefore suggest that the closing line of the sextette be amended to read ­

     Fair clams reward thy long, laborious days.”

Harwood was liked by his fellow students in the law office.  Two Yalensians, already established there, made his lot easier, and they combined against a lone Harvardian, who bitterly resented Harwood’s habit of smoking a cob pipe in the library at night.  The bouquet of Dan’s pipe was pretty well dispelled by morning save to the discerning nostril of the harvard man, who protested against it, and said the offense was indictable at common law.  Harwood stood stoutly for his rights and privileges, and for Yale democracy, which he declared his pipe exemplified.  There was much good-natured banter of this sort in the office.

Harwood was busy filing papers when Mr. Fitch summoned him to his private room on the day indicated.  Fitch was short, thin, and bald, with a clipped reddish beard, brown eyes, and a turn-up nose.  He was considered a better lawyer than Wright, who was the orator of the firm, and its reliance in dealing with juries.  In the preparation of briefs and in oral arguments before the Supreme Court, Fitch was the superior.  His personal peculiarities had greatly Interested Harwood; as, for example, Fitch’s manner of locking himself in his room for days at a time while he was preparing to write a brief, denying himself to all visitors, and only occasionally calling for books from the library.  Then, when he had formulated his ideas, he summoned the stenographer and dictated at one sitting a brief that generally proved to be the reviewing court’s own judgment of the case in hand.  Some of Fitch’s fellow practitioners intimated at times that he was tricky.  In conferences with opposing counsel, one heard, he required watching, as he was wary of committing himself and it was difficult to discover what line of reasoning he elected to oppose or defend.  In such conferences it was his fashion to begin any statement that might seem even remotely to bind him with the remark, “I’m just thinking aloud on that proposition and don’t want to be bound by what I say.”  The students in the office, to whom he was unfailingly courteous, apostrophized him as “the fox.”  He called them all “Mister,” and occasionally flattered them by presenting a hypothetical case for their consideration.

Fitch was sitting before the immaculate desk he affected (no one ever dared leave anything on it in his absence) when Harwood entered.  The lawyer’s chair was an enormous piece of furniture in which his small figure seemed to shrink and hide.  His hands were thrust into his pockets, as they usually were, and he piped out “Good-Morning” in a high tenor voice.

“Shut the door, please, Mr. Harwood.  What have you to report about your errand to Montgomery?”

He indicated with a nod the one chair in the room and Harwood seated himself.

“I found Professor Kelton without difficulty and presented the letter.”

“You delivered the letter and you have told no one of your visit to Montgomery.”

“No one, sir; no one knows I have been away from town.  I handed the letter to the gentleman in his own house, alone, and he gave me his answer.”

“Well?”

“No is the answer.”

Fitch polished his eyeglasses with his handkerchief.  He scrutinized Harwood carefully for a moment, then asked: ­

“Did the gentleman ­whose name, by the way, you have forgotten ­”

“Yes, sir; I have quite forgotten it,” Harwood replied promptly.

“Did he show any feeling ­indignation, pique, as he read the letter?”

“No; but he read it carefully.  His face showed pain, I should say, sir, rather than indignation.  He gave his negative reply coldly ­a little sharply.  He was very courteous ­a gentleman, I should say, beyond any question.”

“I dare say.  What kind of an establishment did he keep?”

“A small cottage, with books everywhere, right by the campus.  A young girl let me in; she spoke of the professor as her grandfather.  She went off to find him for me in the college library.”

“A young person.  What did she look like?”

“A dark young miss, with black hair tied with a red ribbon.”

Fitch smiled.

“You are sure of the color, are you?  This man lives there with his granddaughter, and the place was simple ­comfortable, no luxuries.  You had no conversation with him.”

“I think we exchanged a word about the weather, which was warm.”

Fitch smiled again.  His was a rare smile, but it was worth waiting for.

“What did the trip cost you?”

Harwood named the amount and the lawyer drew a check book from his impeccable desk and wrote.

“I have added one hundred dollars for your services.  This is a personal matter between you and me, and does not go on the office books.  By the way, Mr. Harwood, what are you doing out there?” he asked, moving his head slightly toward the outer office.

“I’m reading law.”

“Is it possible!  The other youngsters in the office seem to be talking politics or reading newspapers most of the time.  How do you manage to live?”

“I do some work for the ‘Courier’ from time to time.”

“Ah!  You are careful not to let your legal studies get mixed with the newspaper work?”

“Yes, sir.  They put me on meetings, and other night assignments.  As to the confidences of this office, you need have no fear of my ­”

“I haven’t, Mr. Harwood.  Let me see.  It was of you Professor Sumner wrote me last year; he’s an old friend of mine.  He said he thought you had a sinewy mind ­a strong phrase for Sumner.”

“He never told me that,” said Dan, laughing.  “He several times implied quite the reverse.”

“He’s a great man ­Sumner.  I suppose you absorbed a good many of his ideas at New Haven.”

“I hope I did, sir:  I believe in most of them anyhow.”

“So do I, Mr. Harwood.”

Fitch pointed to a huge pile of manuscript on a table by the window.  It was a stenographic transcript of testimony in a case which had been lost in the trial court and was now going up on appeal.

“Digest that evidence and give me the gist of it in not more than five hundred words.  That’s all.”

Harwood’s hand was on the door when Fitch arrested him with a word.

“To recur to this private transaction between us, you have not the remotest idea what was in that letter, and nothing was said in the interview that gave you any hint ­is that entirely correct?”

“Absolutely.”

“Very well.  I know nothing of the matter myself; I am merely accommodating a friend.  We need not refer to this again.”

When the door had closed, the lawyer wrote a brief note which he placed in his pocket, and dropped later into a letter-box with his own hand.  Mr. Fitch, of the law firm of Wright and Fitch, was not in the habit of acting as agent in matters he didn’t comprehend, and his part in Harwood’s errand was not to his liking.  He had spoken the truth when he said that he knew no more of the nature of the letter that had been carried to Professor Kelton than the messenger, and Harwood’s replies to his interrogatories had told him nothing.

Many matters, however, pressed upon his attention and offered abundant exercise for his curiosity.  With Harwood, too, pleased to have for the first time in his life one hundred dollars in cash, the incident was closed.