YOUTH
1859-1881
As the education of a prince, and
the surroundings in which he is brought up, are usually
different from the education and surroundings of his
subjects, it is not surprising if, at least during
some portion of his reign, and until he has graduated
in the university of life, misunderstandings, if nothing
worse, should occur between them: indeed the
wonder is that princes and people succeed in living
harmoniously together. They are separated by
great gulfs both of sentiment and circumstance.
Bismarck is quoted by one of his successors, Prince
Hohenlohe, as remarking that every King of Prussia,
with whatever popularity he began his reign, was invariably
hated at the close of it.
The prince that would rule well has
to study the science of government, itself a difficult
and incompletely explored subject, and the art of
administration; he has to know history, and above all
the history of his own country; not that history is
a safe or certain guide, but that it informs him of
traditions he will be expected to continue in his
own country and respect in that of others; he must
understand the political system under which his people
choose to live, and the play of political, religious,
economic, and social forces which are ever at work
in a community; he must learn to speak and understand
(not always quite the same thing) other languages besides
his own; and concurrently with these studies he must
endeavour to develop in himself the personal qualities
demanded by his high office health and
activity of body, quick comprehension and decision,
a tenacious memory for names and faces, capacity for
public speaking, patience, and that command over the
passions and prejudices, natural or acquired, which
is necessary for his moral influence as a ruler.
On what percentage of his subjects is such a curriculum
imposed, and what allowances should not be made if
a full measure of success is not achieved?
But even when the prince has done
all this, there is still a study, the most comprehensive
and most important of all, in which he should be learned the
study of humanity, and in especial that part of it
with the care of whose interests and happiness he is
to be charged. A few people seem to have this
knowledge instinctively, others acquire something
of it in the school of sad experience. It is not
the fault of the Emperor, if, in his youth, his knowledge
of humanity was not profound. There was always
a strong vein of idealism and romance among Hohenzollerns,
the vein of a Lohengrin, a Tancred, or some mediaeval
knight. The Emperor, of course, never lived among
the common people; never had to work for a living
in competition with a thousand others more fortunate
than he, or better endowed by nature with the qualities
and gifts that make for worldly success; never, so
far as is known to a watchful and exceptionally curious
public, endured domestic sorrow of a deep or lasting
kind; never suffered materially or in his proper person
from ingratitude, carelessness, or neglect; never knew
the “penalty of Adam, the seasons’ difference”;
never, in short, felt those pains one or more of which
almost all the rest of mankind have at one time or
other to bear as best they may.
The Emperor has always been happy
in his family, happy in seeing his country prosperous,
happy in the admiration and respect of the people
of all nations; and if he has passed through some dark
hours, he must feel happy in having nobly borne them.
Want of knowledge of the trials of ordinary humanity
is, of course, no matter of reproach to him; on the
contrary, it is matter of congratulation; and, as several
of his frankest deliverances show, he has, both as
man and monarch, felt many a pang, many a regret,
many a disappointment, the intensity of which cannot
be gauged by those who have not felt the weight of
his responsibilities.
A discharge of 101 guns in the gardens
of Crown Prince Frederick’s palace in Berlin
on the morning of January 27, 1859, announced the
birth of the future Emperor. There were no portents
in that hour. Nature proceeded calmly with her
ordinary tasks. Heaven gave no special sign that
a new member of the Hohenzollern family had appeared
on the planet Earth. Nothing, in short, occurred
to strengthen the faith of those who believe in the
doctrine of kingship by divine appointment.
It was a time of political and social
turmoil in many countries, the groundswell, doubtless,
of the revolutionary wave of 1848. The Crimean
War, the Indian Mutiny, and the war with China had
kept England in a continual state of martial fever,
and the agitation for electoral reform was beginning.
Lord Palmerston was Prime Minister, with Lord Odo
Russell as Minister for Foreign Affairs and Mr. Gladstone
as Minister of Finance. Napoleon III was at war
with Austria as the ally of Italy, where King Emmanuel
II and Cavour were laying the foundations of their
country’s unity. Russia, after defeating
Schamyl, the hero of the Caucasus, was pursuing her
policy of penetration in Central Asia.
In Prussia the unrest was chiefly
domestic. The country, while nominally a Great
Power, was neutral during the Crimean War, and played
for the moment but a small part in foreign politics.
Bismarck, in his “Gedanke und Erinnerungen,”
compares her submission to Austria to the patience
of the French noble-man he heard of when minister in
Paris, whose conduct in condoning twenty-four acts
of flagrant infidelity on the part of his wife was
regarded by the French as an act of great forbearance
and magnanimity. Prince William, the Emperor’s
grandfather, afterwards William I, first German Emperor,
was on the throne, acting as Prince Regent for his
brother, Frederick William IV, incapacitated from
ruling by an affection of the brain. The head
of the Prussian Ministry, Manteuffel, had been dismissed,
and a “new era,” with ministers of more
liberal tendencies, among them von Bethmann Hollweg,
an ancestor of the present Chancellor, had begun.
General von Roon was Minister of War and Marine, offices
at that time united in one department. The Italian
War had roused Germany anew to a desire for union,
and a great “national society” was founded
at Frankfurt, with the Liberal leader, Rudolf von
Bennigsen, at its head. Public attention was
occupied with the subject of reorganizing the army
and increasing it from 150,000 to 210,000 men.
Parliament was on the eve of a bitter constitutional
quarrel with Bismarck, who became Prussian Prime Minister
(Minister President) in 1862, about the grant of the
necessary army funds. Most of the great intellects
of Germany Kant, Goethe, Schiller, Hegel,
Fichte, Schleiermacher had long passed
away. Heinrich Heine died in Paris in 1856.
Frederick Nietzsche was a youth, Richard Wagner’s
“Tannhaeuser” had just been greeted, in
the presence of the composer, with a storm of hisses
in the Opera house at Paris. The social condition
of Germany may be partially realized if one remembers
that the death-rate was over 28 per mille,
as compared with 17 per mille to-day; that only
a start had been made with railway construction; that
the country, with its not very generous soil, depended
wholly upon agriculture; that savings-bank deposits
were not one-twelfth of what they are now; that there
were 60 training schools where there are 221 to-day,
and 338 evening classes as against 4,588 in 1910;
that many of the principal towns were still lighted
by oil; that there was practically no navy; and that
the bulk of the aristocracy lived on about the same
scale as the contemporary English yeoman farmer.
Berlin contained a little less than half a million
inhabitants, compared with its three and a half millions
of to-day, and the state of its sanitation may be imagined
from the fact that open drains ran down the streets.
The Emperor’s father, Frederick
III, second German Emperor, was affectionately known
to his people as “unser Fritz,”
because of his liberal sympathies and of his high
and kindly character. To most Englishmen he is
perhaps better known as the husband of the Princess,
afterwards Empress, Adelaide Victoria, eldest daughter
of Queen Victoria, and mother of the Emperor.
Frederick III had no great share in the political
events which were the birth-pangs of modern Germany,
unless his not particularly distinguished leadership
in the war of 1866 and that with France be so considered.
The greater part of his life was passed as Crown Prince,
and a Crown Prince in Germany leads a life more or
less removed from political responsibilities.
He succeeded his father, William I, on the latter’s
death, March 9, 1888, reigned for ninety-nine days,
and died, on June 15th following, from cancer of the
throat, after an illness borne with exemplary fortitude.
To what extent the character of his
parents affected the character of the Emperor it is
impossible to determine. The Emperor seldom refers
to his parents in his speeches, and reserves most of
his panegyric for his grandfather and his grandfather’s
mother, Queen Louise; but the comparative neglect
is probably due to no want of filial admiration and
respect, while the frequent references to his grandfather
in particular are explained by the great share the
latter took in the formation of the Empire and by
his unbounded popularity. The Crown Prince was
an affectionate but not an easy-going father, with
a passion for the arts and sciences; his mother also
was a disciplinarian, and, equally with her husband,
passionately fond of art; and it is therefore not
improbable that these traits descended to the Emperor.
As to whether the alleged “liberality”
of the Crown Prince descended to him depends on the
sense given to the word “liberal.”
If it is taken to mean an ardent desire for the good
and happiness of the people, it did; if it is taken
to mean any inclination to give the people authority
to govern themselves and direct their own destinies,
it did not.
The mother of the Emperor, the Empress
Frederick, had much of Queen Victoria’s good
sense and still more of her strong will. A thoroughly
English princess, she had, in German eyes, one serious
defect: she failed to see, or at least to acknowledge,
the superiority of most things German to most things
English. She had an English nurse, Emma Hobbs,
to assist at the birth of the future Emperor.
She made English the language of the family life,
and never lost her English tastes and sympathies;
consequently she was called, always with an accent
of reproach, “the Englaenderin,” and in
German writings is represented as having wished to
anglicize not only her husband, her children, and her
Court, but also her adopted country and its people.
A chaplain of the English Church in Berlin, the Rev.
J.H. Fry, who met her many times, describes her
as follows:
“She was not the wife for a German
Emperor, she so English and insisted so strongly
on her English ways. The result was that
she was very unpopular in Germany, and the Germans
said many wicked things of her. She hated
Berlin, and if her son, the present Emperor,
had not required that she should come to the
capital every winter, she would have lived altogether
at Cronberg in the villa an Italian friend bequeathed
to her.
“She was extremely musical, had
extensively cultivated her talents in this respect,
and was an accomplished linguist. Like her
mother, Queen Victoria, she was unusually strong-minded,
and was always believed to rule over her amiable
and gentle husband. Her interest in the English
community was great, another reason for the dislike
with which the Germans regarded her. To
her the community owes the pretty little English
church in the Mon Bijou Platz (Berlin), which
she used to attend regularly, and where a funeral
service, at which the Emperor was present, was held
in memory of her.
“German feeling was further embittered
against her by the Morell Mackenzie incident,
and to this day controversy rages round the famous
English surgeon’s name. The controversy
is as to whether or not Morell Mackenzie honestly
believed what he said when he diagnosed the Emperor’s
illness as non-cancerous in opposition to the
opinion of distinguished German doctors like
Professor Bergmann. Under German law no one
can mount the throne of Prussia who is afflicted with
a mortal sickness. For long it had been
suspected that the Emperor’s throat was
fatally affected, and, therefore, when King William
was dying, it became of dynastic and national importance
to establish the fact one way or other. Queen
Victoria was ardently desirous of seeing her daughter
an Empress, and sent Sir Morrell Mackenzie to
Germany to examine the royal patient. On
the verdict being given that the disease was
not cancer, the Crown Prince mounted the throne,
and Queen Victoria’s ambition for her daughter
was realized.
“The Empress also put the aristocracy
against her by introducing several relaxations
into Court etiquette which had up to her time
been stiff and formal. Her relations with Bismarck,
as is well known, were for many years strained, and
on one occasion she made the remark that the tears
he had caused her to shed ‘would fill tumblers.’
On the whole she was an excellent wife and mother.
She was no doubt in some degree responsible for
the admiration of England as a country and of
the English as a people which is a marked feature
of the Emperor’s character.”
This account is fairly correct in
its estimation of the Empress Frederick’s character
and abilities, but it repeats a popular error in saying
that German law lays down that no one can mount the
Prussian throne if he is afflicted with a mortal sickness.
There is no “German law” on the subject,
and the law intended to be referred to is the so-called
“house-law,” which, as in the case of other
German noble families, regulates the domestic concerns
of the House of Hohenzollern. Bismarck disposes
of the assertion that a Hohenzollern prince mortally
stricken is not capable of succession as a “fable,”
and adds that the Constitution, too, contains no stipulation
of the sort. The influence of his mother on the
Emperor’s character did not extend beyond his
childhood, while probably the only natural dispositions
he inherited from her were his strength of will and
his appreciation of classical art and music.
Many of her political ideas were diametrically opposed
to those of her son. Her love of art made her
pro-French, and her visit to Paris, it will be remembered,
not being made incognito, led to international
unpleasantness, originating in the foolish Chauvinism
of some leading French painters whose ateliers
she desired to inspect. She believed in a homogeneous
German Empire without any federation of kingdoms and
states, advocated a Constitution for Russia, and was
satisfied that the common sense of a people outweighed
its ignorance and stupidity.
The Emperor has four sisters and a
brother. The sisters are Charlotte, born in 1860,
and married to the Hereditary Prince of Saxe-Meiningen;
Victoria, born in 1866, and married to Prince Adolphus
of Schaumberg-Lippe; Sophie, born in 1870, and married
to King Constantine, of Greece; and Margarete, born
in 1872, and married to Prince Friederich Karl of
Hessen.
The Emperor’s only brother,
Prince Henry of Prussia, was born in 1862, and is
married to Princess Irene of Hessen. He is
probably the most popular Hohenzollern to-day.
He adopted the navy as a profession and devotes himself
to its duties, taking no part in politics. Like
the Emperor himself and the Emperor’s heir,
the Crown Prince, he is a great promoter of sport,
and while a fair golfer (with a handicap of 14) and
tennis player, gives much of his leisure to the encouragement
of the automobile and other industries. Every
Hohenzollern is supposed to learn a handicraft.
The Emperor did not, owing to his shortened left arm.
Prince Henry learned book-binding under a leading Berlin
bookbinder, Herr Collin. The Crown Prince is a
turner. Prince Henry seems perfectly satisfied
with his position in the Empire as Inspector-General
of the Fleet, stands to attention when talking to
the Emperor in public, and on formal occasions addresses
him as “Majesty” like every one else.
Only in private conversation does he allow himself
the use of the familiar Du. The Emperor
has a strong affection for him, and always calls him
“Heinrich.”
Many stories are current in Germany
relating to the early part of the Emperor’s
boyhood. Some are true, others partially so, while
others again are wholly apochryphal. All, however,
are more or less characteristic of the boy and his
surroundings, and for this reason a selection of them
may be given. Apropos of his birth, the following
story is told. An artillery officer went to receive
orders for the salute to be discharged when the birth
occurred. They were given him by the then Prince
Regent, afterwards Emperor William I. The officer
showed signs of perplexity. “Well, is there
anything else?” inquired the Regent. “Yes,
Royal Highness; I have instructions for the birth of
a prince and for that of a princess (which would be
30 guns); but what if it should be twins?” The
Regent laughed. “In that case,” he
said, “follow the Prussian rule suum
cuique.”
When the child was born the news ran
like wildfire through Berlin, and all the high civil
and military officials drove off in any vehicle they
could find to offer their congratulations. The
Regent, who was at the Foreign Office, jumped into
a common cab. Immediately after him appeared
tough old Field-Marshal Wrangel, the hero of the Danish
wars. He wrote his name in the callers’
book, and on issuing from the palace shouted to the
assembled crowd, “Children, it’s all right:
a fine stout recruit.” On the evening of
the birth a telegram came from Queen Victoria, “Is
it a fine boy?” and the answer went back, “Yes,
a very fine boy.”
Another story describes how the child
was brought to submit cheerfully to the ordeal of
the tub. He was “water-shy,” like
the vast majority of Germans at that time, and the
nurses had to complain to his father, Crown Prince
Frederick, of his resistance. The Crown Prince
thereupon directed the sentry at the palace gate not
to salute the boy when he was taken out for his customary
airing. The boy remarked the neglect and complained
to his father, who explained that “sentries were
not allowed to present arms to an unwashed prince.”
The stratagem succeeded, and thereafter the lad submitted
to the bathing with a good grace.
Like all boys, the lad was fond of
the water, though now in another sense. At the
age of two, nursery chroniclers relate, he had a toy
boat, the Fortuna, in which he sat and see-sawed and
learned not to be sea-sick! At three he was put
into sailor’s costume, with the bell-shaped
trousers so dear to the hearts of English mothers fifty
years ago.
At the age of four he had a memorable
experience, though it is hardly likely that now, after
the lapse of half a century, he remembers much about
it. This was his first visit to England in 1863,
when he was taken by his parents to be present at
the marriage of his uncle, King Edward VII, then Prince
of Wales. The boy, in pretty Highland costume,
was an object of general attention, and occupies a
prominent place in the well-known picture of the wedding
scene by the artist Frith. The ensuing fifteen
years saw him often on English soil with his father
and mother, staying usually at Osborne Castle, in the
Isle of Wight. Here, it may be assumed, he first
came in close contact with the ocean, watched the
English warships passing up and down, and imbibed
some of that delight in the sea which is not the least
part of the heritage of Englishmen. The visits
had a decided effect on him, for at ten we find him
with a row-boat on the Havel and learning to swim,
and on one occasion rowing a distance of twenty-five
miles between 6 a.m. and 3 p.m. About this time
he used to take part with his parents in excursions
on the Royal Louise, a miniature frigate presented
by George IV to Frederick William III.
Still another story concerns the boy
and his father. The former came one day in much
excitement to his tutor and said his father had just
blamed him unjustly. He told the tutor what had
really happened and asked him, if, under the circumstances,
he was to blame. The tutor was in perplexity,
for if he said the father had acted unjustly, as in
fact he thought he had, he might lessen the son’s
filial respect. However, he gave his candid opinion.
“My Prince,” he said, “the greatest
men of all times have occasionally made mistakes, for
to err is human. I must admit I think your father
was in the wrong.” “Really!”
cried the lad, who looked pained. “I thought
you would tell me I was in the wrong, and as I know
how right you always are I was ready to go to papa
and beg his pardon. What shall I do now?”
“Leave it to me,” the tutor said, and
afterwards told the Crown Prince what had passed.
The Crown Prince sent for his son, who came and stood
with downcast eyes some paces off. The Crown
Prince only uttered the two words, “My son,”
but in a tone of great affection. As he folded
the Prince in his arms he reached his hand to the
tutor, saying, “I thank you. Be always
as true to me and to my son as you have been in this
case.”
The last anecdote belongs also to
the young Prince’s private tutor days.
At one time a certain Dr. D. was teaching him.
Every morning at eleven work was dropped for a quarter
of an hour to enable the pair, teacher and pupil,
to take what is called in German “second breakfast.”
The Prince always had a piece of white bread and butter,
with an apple, a pear, or other fruit, while the teacher
was as regularly provided with something warm chop,
a cutlet, a slice of fish, salmon, perch, trout, or
whatever was in season, accompanied by salad and potatoes.
The smell of the meat never failed to appeal to the
olfactory nerves of the Prince, and he often looked,
longingly enough, at the luxuries served to his tutor.
The latter noticed it and felt sorry for him; but
there was nothing to be done: the royal orders
were strict and could not be disobeyed. One day,
however, the lesson, one of repetition, had gone so
well that in a moment of gratitude the tutor decided
to reward his pupil at all hazards. The lunch
appeared, steaming “perch-in-butter” for
the tutor, and a plate of bread and butter and some
grapes for the pupil. The Prince cast a glance
at the savoury dish and was then about to attack his
frugal fare when the tutor suddenly said, “Prince,
I’m very fond of grapes. Can’t we
for once exchange? You eat my perch and I ”
The Prince joyfully agreed, plates were exchanged,
and both were heartily enjoying the meal when the
Crown Prince walked in. Both pupil and tutor blushed
a little, but the Crown Prince said nothing and seemed
pleased to hear how well the lesson had gone that
day. At noon, however, as the tutor was leaving
the palace, a servant stopped him and said, “His
Royal Highness the Crown Prince would like to speak
with the Herr Doktor.”
“Herr Doktor,” said the
Crown Prince, “tell me how it was that the Prince
to-day was eating the warm breakfast and you the cold.”
The tutor tried to make as little
of the affair as possible. It was a joke, he
said, he had allowed himself, he had been so well pleased
with his pupil that morning.
“Well, I will pass it over this
time,” said the Crown Prince,
“but I must ask you to let the
Prince get accustomed to bear the preference
shown to his tutor and allow him to be satisfied
with the simple food suitable for his age. What
will he eat twenty years hence, if he now gets
roast meat? Bread and fruit make a wholesome
and perfectly satisfactory meal for a lad of
his years.”
During second breakfast next day,
the Prince took care not to look up from his plate
of fruit, but when he had finished, murmured as though
by way of grace, “After all, a fine bunch of
grapes is a splendid lunch, and I really think I prefer
it, Herr Doktor, to your nice-smelling perch-in-butter.”
The time had now come when the young
Prince was to leave the paternal castle and submit
to the discipline of school. The parents, one
may be sure, held many a conference on the subject.
The boy was beginning to have a character of his own,
and his parents doubtless often had in mind Goethe’s
lines:
“Denn wir
koennen die Kinder nach unserem Willen
nicht formen,
So wie Gott
sie uns gab, so muss man sie
lieben und haben,
Sie erzielen
aufs best und jeglichen lassen gewaehren.”
("We cannot have children
according to our will:
as God gave them so
must we love and keep them:
bring them up as best
we can and leave each to its own
development.”)
It had always been Hohenzollern practice
to educate the Heir to the Throne privately until
he was of an age to go to the university, but the
royal parents now decided to make an important departure
from it by sending their boy to an ordinary public
school in some carefully chosen place. The choice
fell on Cassel, a quiet and beautiful spot not far
from Wilhelmshohe, near Homburg, where there is a Hohenzollern
castle, and which was the scene of Napoleon’s
temporary detention after the capitulation of Sedan.
Here at the Gymnasium, or lycee, founded by
Frederick the Great, the boy was to go through the
regular school course, sit on the same bench with
the sons of ordinary burghers, and in all respects
conform to the Gymnasium’s regulations.
The decision to have the lad taught for a time in this
democratic fashion was probably due to the influence
of his English mother, who may have had in mind the
advantages of an English public school. The experiment
proved in every way successful, though it was at the
time adversely criticized by some ultra-patriotic
writers in the press. To the boy himself it must
have been an interesting and agreeable novelty.
Hitherto he had been brought up in the company of his
brothers and sisters in Berlin or Potsdam, with an
occasional “week-end” at the royal farm
of Bornstedt near the latter, the only occasions when
he was absent from home being sundry visits to the
Grand Ducal Court at Karlsruhe, where the Grand Duchess
was an aunt on his father’s side, and to the
Court at Darmstadt, where the Grand Duchess was an
aunt on the side of his mother.
An important ceremony, however, had
to be performed before his departure for school his
confirmation. It took place at Potsdam on September
1, 1874, amid a brilliant crowd of relatives and friends,
and included the following formal declaration by the
young Prince:
“I will, in childlike faith,
be devoted to God all the days of my life, put
my trust in Him and at all times thank Him for
His grace. I believe in Jesus Christ, the Saviour
and Redeemer. Him who first loved me I will
love in return, and will show this love by love
to my parents, my dear grandparents, my sisters
and brothers and relatives, but also to all men.
I know that hard tasks await me in life, but
they will brace me up, not overcome me. I will
pray to God for strength and develop my bodily
powers.”
The boy and his brother Henry stayed
in Cassel for three years, in the winter occupying
a villa near the Gymnasium with Dr. Hinzpeter, and
in summer living in the castle of Wilhelmshohe hard
by. Besides attending the usual school classes,
they were instructed by private tutors in dancing,
fencing, and music. Both pupils are represented
as having been conscientious, and as moving among
their schoolmates without affectation or any special
consciousness of their birth or rank. Many years
afterwards the Emperor, when revisiting Cassel, thus
referred to his schooldays there:
“I do not regret for an instant
a time which then seemed so hard to me, and I
can truly say that work and the working life
have become to me a second nature. For this I
owe thanks to Cassel soil;”
and later in the same speech:
“I am pleased
to be on the ground where, directed by expert
hands, I learned that
work exists not only for its own sake,
but that man in work
shall find his entire joy.”
This is the right spirit; but if he
had said “greatest joy” and “can
find,” he would have said something more completely
true.
The life at Cassel was simple, and
the day strictly divided. The future Emperor
rose at six, winter and summer, and after a breakfast
of coffee and rolls refreshed his memory of the home
repetition-work learned the previous evening.
He then went to the Gymnasium, and when his lessons
there were over, took a walk with his tutor before
lunch. Home tasks followed, and on certain days
private instruction was received in English, French,
and drawing. His English and French became all
but faultless, and he learned to draw in rough-and-ready,
if not professionally expert fashion. Wednesdays
and Saturdays, which were half-holidays, were spent
roving in the country, especially in the forest, with
two or three companions of his own age. In winter
there was skating on the ponds. The Sunday dinner
was a formal affair, at which royal relatives, who
doubtless came to see how the princes were getting
on, and high officials from Berlin, were usually present.
After dinner the princes took young friends up to their
private rooms and played charades, in which on occasion
they amused themselves with the ever-delightful sport
of taking off and satirizing their instructors.
At this time the future Emperor’s favourite subjects
were history and literature, and he was fond of displaying
his rhetorical talent before the class. The classical
authors of his choice were Homer, Sophocles, and Horace.
Homer particularly attracted him; it is easy to imagine
the conviction with which, as a Hohenzollern, he would
deliver the declaration of King Agamemnon to Achilles:
“And hence, to
all the host it shall be known
That kings are subject
to the gods alone.”
The young Prince left Cassel in January,
1877, after passing the exit (abiturient) examination,
a rather severe test, twelfth in a class of seventeen.
The result of the examination was officially described
as “satisfactory,” the term used for those
who were second in degree of merit. On leaving
he was awarded a gold medal for good conduct, one
of three annually presented by a patron of the Gymnasium.
A foreign resident in Germany, who
saw the young Prince at this time, tells of an incident
which refers to the lad’s appearance, and shows
that even at that early date anti-English feeling existed
among the people. It was at the military manoeuvres
at Stettin:
“Then the old Emperor came by.
Tremendous cheers. Then Bismarck and Moltke.
Great acclaim. Then passed in a carriage
a thin, weakly-looking youth, and people in the crowd
said, ’Look at that boy who is to be our future
Emperor his good German blood has been
ruined by his English training.’”
Before closing the Emperor’s
record as a schoolboy it will be of interest to learn
the opinion of him formed by his French tutor at Cassel,
Monsieur Ayme, who has published a small volume on
the education of his pupil, and who, though evidently
not too well satisfied with his remuneration of L7
10s. a month, or with being required to pay his own
fare back from Germany to France, writes favourably
of the young princes. “The life of these
young people (Prince William and Prince Henry) was,”
he says,
“the most studious and peaceful
imaginable. Up at six in the morning, they
prepared their tasks until it was time to go to
school. Lunch was at noon and tea at five.
They went to bed at nine or half-past. All
their hours of leisure were divided between lessons
in French, English, music, pistol-shooting, equitation,
and walking. Now and then they were allowed
to play with boys of their own age, and on fête days
and their parents’ birth-anniversaries they had
the privilege of choosing a play and seeing it
performed at the theatre. As pocket-money
Prince William received 20s. a month, and Henry
10s. Out of these modest sums they had to buy
their own notepaper and little presents for the servants
or their favourite companions.”
As to Prince William’s character
as a schoolboy, Monsieur Ayme writes:
“I do not suppose William was
ever punished while he was in Cassel. He
was too proud to draw down upon himself criticism,
to him the worst form of punishment. At the castle,
as at school, he made it a point of honour to act
and work as if he had made his plans and resolved
to stick to them. He was always among the
first of his class, and as for me I never had
any need to urge him on. If I pointed out to
him an error in his task he began it over again of
his own accord. We did grammar, analysis,
dictations, and compositions, and he got over
his difficulties by sheer perseverance.
For example, if he was reading a fine page of Victor
Hugo, or the like, he hated to be interrupted, so
deeply was he interested in the subject he was
reading. Style and poetry had a great effect
upon him; he expressed admiration for the form
and was aroused to enthusiasm by generous or
noble ideas. Frederick the Great was the hero
of his choice, a model of which he never ceased
dreaming, and which, like his grandfather, he
proposed as his own. It is easy to conceive
that after ten or twelve years of such study,
regularly and methodically pursued, the Prince must
have possessed a literary and scientific baggage
more varied and extensive than that of his companions.
And he worked hard for it, few lads so hard.
To speak the truth, he was much more disciplined
and much more deprived of freedom and recreation
of all sorts than most children of his age.”
Par paranthese may be introduced
here a reference to Prince Henry, of whom Monsieur
Ayme writes less enthusiastically.
“One day,” the tutor writes,
“I was dictating to him something in which
mention of a queen occurs. I came to the words
’... in addition to her natural distinction she
possessed that August majesty which is the appanage
of princesses of the blood royal....’
“Prince Henry
laid down his pen and remarked, ’The author
who wrote this piece
did not live much with queens.’
“‘Why?’
I asked.
“’Because
I never observed the August majesty which attaches
to princesses of the
blood royal, and yet I have been
brought up among them,’
was the reply.
“William, however,” continues
Monsieur Ayme, “was the thinker, prudent
and circumspect; the wise head which knew that
it was not all truths which bear telling. He was
not less loyal and constant in his opinions.
He admired the French Revolution, and the declaration
contained in ’The Rights of Man,’
though this did not prevent his declaiming against
the Terrorists.”
One incident in particular must have
appealed to the French tutor. Monsieur Ayme and
his Prussian pupil one day began discussing the delicate
question of the war of 1870. In the course of
the discussion both parties lost their tempers, until
at last Prince William suddenly got up and left the
room. He remained silent and “huffed”
for some days, but at last he took the Frenchman aside
and made him a formal apology. “I am very
sorry indeed,” he said,
“that you took seriously my conduct
of the other day. I meant nothing by it,
and I regret it hurt you. I am all the more
sorry, because I offended in your case a sentiment
which I respect above any in the world, the love
of country.”
But it is time to pass from the details
of the Emperor’s early youth, and observe him
during the two years he spent, with interruptions,
at the university. From Cassel he went immediately
to Bonn, where, as during the years of military duty
which followed, we only catch glimpses of him as he
lived the ordinary, and by no means austere, life
of the university student and soldier of the time;
that is to say, the ordinary life with considerable
modifications and exceptions. He did not, like
young Bismarck, drink huge flagons of beer at a sitting,
day after day. He was not followed everywhere
by a boar-hound. He fought no student’s
duels though a secret performance of the
kind is mentioned as a probability in the chronicles or
go about looking for trouble generally as the swashbuckling
Junker, Bismarck, did; for in the first place his
royal rank would not allow of his taking part in the
bloody amusement of the Mensur, and his natural
disposition, if it was quick and lively, was not choleric
enough to involve him in serious quarrel. His
studies were to some extent interrupted by military
calls to Berlin, for after being appointed second
lieutenant in the First Regiment of Foot Guards at
Potsdam on his tenth birthday, the Hohenzollern age
for entering the army, he was promoted to first lieutenant
in the same regiment on leaving Cassel.
For the most part the university lectures
he attended were the courses in law and philosophy,
and he is not reported to have shown any particular
enthusiasm for either subject. The differences
between an English and a German university are of
a fundamental kind, perhaps the greatest being that
the German university does not aim at influencing
conduct and character in the same measure as the English,
but is rather for the supply of knowledge of all sorts,
as a monster warehouse is for the supply of miscellaneous
goods. Again, the German university, which, like
all American universities except Princetown, has more
resemblance to the Scottish universities than to those
at Oxford, Cambridge, or Dublin, is not residential
nor divided into colleges, but is departmentalized
into “faculties,” each with its own professors
and privat docentes, or official lecturers,
mostly young savants, who have not the rank or title
of professor, but have obtained only the venia
legendi from the university. The lectures,
as a rule of admirable learning and thoroughness, invariably
laying great and prosy stress on “development,”
are delivered in large halls and may be subscribed
for in as many faculties as the student chooses, the
cost being about thirty shillings or there-abouts
per term for each lecture “heard.”
Outside the university the student enjoys complete
independence, which is a privilege highly (and sometimes
violently) cherished, especially by non-studious undergraduates,
under the name “academic freedom.”
The German preparing for one or other of the learned
professions will probably spend a year or two at each
of three, or maybe four, universities, according to
the special faculty he adopts and for which the university
has a reputation. There are plenty of hard-working
students of course; nowadays probably the great majority
are of this kind; but to a large proportion also the
university period is still a pleasant, free, and easy
halting-place between the severe discipline and work
of the school and the stern struggle of the working
world.
The social life of the English university
is paralleled in Germany by associations of students
in student “Corps,” with theatrical uniforms
for their Chargierte or officers, special caps,
sometimes of extraordinary shape, swords, leather
gauntlets, Wellington boots, and other distinguishing
gaudy insignia. The Corps are more or less select,
the most exclusive of all being the Corps Borussia,
which at every university only admits members of an
upper class of society, though on rare occasions receiving
in its ranks an exceptionally aristocratic, popular,
or wealthy foreigner. To this Corps, the name
of which is the old form of “Prussia,”
the Emperor belonged when at Bonn, and in one or two
of his speeches he has since spoken of the agreeable
memories he retains in connexion with it and the practices
observed by it.
Common to all university associations
in Germany whether Corps, Landsmannschaft,
Burschenschaft, or Turnerschaft is
the practice of the Mensur, or student duel.
It is not a duel in the sense usually given to the
word in England, for it lacks the feature of personal
hostility, hate, or injury, but is a particularly sanguinary
form of the English “single-stick,” in
which swords take the place of sticks. These
swords (Schlaeger), called, curiously enough,
rapière, are long and thin in the blade, and
their weight is such that at every duel students are
told off on whose shoulders the combatants can rest
their outstretched sword-arm in the pauses of the combat
caused by the duellists getting out of breath; consequently,
an undersized student is usually chosen for this considerate
office. The heads and faces of the duellists
are swathed in bandages no small incentive
to perspiration, the vital parts of their bodies are
well protected against a fatal prick or blow, and
the pricks or slashes must be delivered with the hand
and wrist raised head-high above the shoulder.
It is considered disgraceful to move the head, to shrink
in the smallest degree before the adversary, or even
to show feeling when the medical student who acts
as surgeon in an adjoining room staunches the flow
of blood or sews up the scars caused by the swords.
The duel of a more serious kind that with
pistols or the French rapier, or with the bare-pointed
sabre and unprotected bodies is punishable
by law, and is growing rarer each year.
Take a sabre duel “heavy
sabre duel” is the German name for it arising
out of a quarrel in a cafe or beer-house, and in which
one of the opponents may be a foreigner affiliated
to some Corps or Burschenschaft. Cards are
exchanged, and the challenger chooses a second whom
he sends to the opponent. The latter, if he accepts
the challenge, also appoints a second; the seconds
then meet and arrange for the holding of a court of
honour. The court will probably consist of old
Corps students lawyer, a doctor, and two
or three other members of the Corps or Burschenschaft.
The court summons the opponents before it and hears
their account of the quarrel; the seconds produce
evidence, for example the bills at the cafe or beer-hall,
showing how much liquor has been consumed; also as
to age, marriage or otherwise, and so on. Then
the court decides whether there shall be a duel, or
not, and if so, in what form it shall be fought.
The duel may be fixed to take place
at any time within six months, and meanwhile the opponents
industriously practise. The scene of the duel
is usually the back room of some beer-hall, with locked
doors between the duellists and the police. The
latter know very well what is going on, but shut their
eyes to it. The opponents take their places at
about a yard and a half distance from advanced foot
to advanced foot, and a chalk line is drawn between
them. Close behind each opponent is his second
with outstretched sword, ready to knock up the duellists’
weapons in case of too dangerous an impetuosity in
the onset. The umpire (Unparteiischer),
unarmed, stands a little distance from the duellists.
The latter are naked to the waist, but wear
a leather apron like that of a drayman, covering the
lower half of the chest, and another piece of leather,
like a stock, protecting their necks and jugular veins.
The duel may last a couple of hours, and any number
of rounds up to as many as two hundred may be fought.
The rounds consist of three or four blows, and last
about twenty seconds each, when the seconds, who have
been watching behind their men in the attitude of a
wicket-keeper, with their sword-points on the ground,
jump in and knock up the duellists’ weapons.
When one duellist is disabled by skin wounds there
are rarely any others or by want of breath,
palpitation or the like, the duel is over, and
the duellists shake hands. This description,
with some slight modifications, applies to the ordinary
Corps Mensuren, which are simply a bloody species
of gymnastic exercise.
On one occasion early in the reign
the Emperor spoke of the Corps system with great enthusiasm,
and especially endorsed the practice of the Mensur.
“I am quite convinced,” he said at Bonn
in 1891, three years after his accession,
“that every young man who enters
a Corps receives through the spirit which rules
in it, and supposing he imbibes the spirit, his
true directive in life. For it is the best education
for later life a young man can obtain. Whoever
pokes fun at the German student Corps is ignorant
of its true tendency, and I hope that so long
as student Corps exist the spirit which is fostered
in them, and which inspires strength and courage,
will continue, and that for all time the student
will joyfully wield the Schlaeger.”
Regarding the Mensur, he went on:
“Our Mensuren are frequently
misunderstood by the public, but that must not
let us be deceived. We who have been Corps students,
as I myself was, know better. As in the Middle
Ages through our gymnastic exercises (Turniere)
the courage and strength of the man was steeled,
so by means of the Corps spirit and Corps life
is that measure of firmness acquired which is
necessary in later life, and which will continue
to exist as long as there are universities in Germany.”
The word for firmness used by the
Emperor was Festigkeit, which may also be translated
determination, steadiness, fortitude, or resoluteness
of character. It may be that practice of the Mensur,
which is held almost weekly, has a lifelong influence
on the German student’s character. It probably
enables him to look the adversary in the eye look
“hard” at him, as the mariners in Mr. A.W.
Jacobs’s delightful tales look at one another
when some particularly ingenious lie is being produced.
In a way, moreover, it may be said to correspond to
boxing in English universities, schools, and gymnasia.
But, on the whole, the Anglo-Saxon spectator finds
it difficult to understand how it can exercise any
influence for good on the moral character of a youth,
or determine, as the Emperor says it does, a disposition
which is cowardly or weak by nature to bravery or
strength, save of a momentary and merely physical kind.
The Englishman who has been present at a Mensur
is rather inclined to think the atmosphere too much
that of a shambles, and the chief result of the practice
the cultivation of braggadocio.
Besides, the practice is illegal,
and though purposely overlooked, save in one German
city, that of Leipzig, where it is punished with some
rigour, the Emperor, who is supposed to embody the
majesty and effectiveness of the law, is hardly the
person to recommend it. His inconsistency in
the matter on one occasion placed him in an undignified
position. Two officers of the army quarrelled,
and one, an infantry lieutenant, sent a challenge
to the other, an army medical man. The latter
refused on conscientious grounds, whereupon he was
called on by a military court of honour to send in
his resignation. The case was sent up to the
Emperor, who upheld the decision of the court of honour,
adding the remark that if the surgeon had conscientious
scruples on the point he should not remain in the army.
An irate Social Democratic editor thereupon pointed
out that such a decision came with a bad grace from
a man with whom, or with any of whose six sons, no
one was allowed to fight. The Emperor is still
a member of the Borussia Corps, but chiefly shows
his interest by keeping its anniversaries in mind,
by every few years attending one of its annual drinking
festivals (Commers), and by paying a substantial
yearly subscription.
The German student Corps, historically,
go back to the fourteenth century, when the first
European universities were established at Bologna,
Paris, and Orleans. Universities then were not
so called from the universality of their teachings,
but rather as meaning a corporation, confraternity,
or collegium, and were in reality social centres in
the towns where they were instituted. The most
renowned was that of Paris, and here was founded the
first student Corps. It was called the “German
Nation of Paris,” a corporation of students,
with statutes, oaths, special costumes, and other
distinctive features. At first, strange to say,
it contained more Englishmen than Germans. The
“Nation” had a procurator, a treasurer,
and a bedell, the last to look after the legal affairs
of the association. Drinking was not the supposed
purpose of the society, but the Corps mostly assembled,
as German Corps do to-day, for drinking purposes.
The earliest form of German student
associations Was the Landsmannschaft. To this
society, composed of elders and juniors, new-comers,
called Pennales, were admitted after painful ceremonies
and became something like the “fags” at
an English public school. The object of the original
Landsmannschaft was to keep alive the spirit of nationality.
The object of the German Corps is different. It
is to beget and perpetuate friendship, and this accounts
for the steady goodwill the Emperor has always shown
towards the comrades of his Bonn and Borussia
days.
An ancient form of Corps entertainment
is called the Hospiz, now, however, much modified.
Upon invitation the members of the Corps meet in a
beer-hall or in the rooms of one of the Corps.
The president is seated with a house-key on the table
before him as a symbol of unfettered authority.
As members arrive, the president takes away their
sticks and swords and deposits them in a closet.
The guests sit down and are handed filled pipes and
a lighted fidibus, or pipe-lighter. Bread
and butter and cheese, followed by coffee, are offered.
After this, the real work of the evening begins the
drinking. A large can of beer stands on a stool
beside the president. The latter calls for silence
by rapping three times on the table with the house-key,
and the Hospiz is declared open. Thenceforward
only the president pours out the beer, unless he appoints
a deputy during his absence. The president’s
great aim and honour is to make every one, including
himself, intoxicated. He begins by rapping the
table with his glass and saying “Significat
ein Glas.” In response all drain their
glasses. Then comes a “health to all,”
and this is followed by a “health to each.”
“The Ladies” follow, including toasts to
the pretty girls of the town, and ladies known to
be favourites of those present. Married ladies
or women of bad reputation must not be toasted in the
Hospiz.
A story is told of a toast the Emperor,
in these his Lohengrin days, once proposed at a Borussia
meeting. “On the Kreuzberg” (a
hill near Bonn), he said,
“I saw a picture, the ideal of
a German woman. She united in herself beauty
of face and an imposing form, the roses in her
cheeks spoke of the modesty peculiar to our maids,
and her voice sounded harmoniously like the lute
of the Minnesingers on the Wartburg.
She told me her name may it be blessed.”
The toast found its way into the local
papers and gave birth to a romantic legend connecting
the future Emperor with a pretty and modest girl of
the town, but no true basis for it has ever been discovered.
In toasting the Ladies in a Hospiz
each of those present may name the lady of his choice,
and if two name the same lady they have a drinking
bout to determine which is entitled to claim her.
The one who first admits that he can drink no more usually
signified by a hasty and zigzag retreat from the room is
declared the loser. If a guest comes late to
the Hospiz he must drink fast so as to catch up with
earlier arrivals, unless he has been drinking elsewhere,
when he is let off with drinking a “general
health.”
The close of the Emperor’s student
days was marked by an event which was to have a great
influence on his life and happiness. It was in
1879 that he made the acquaintance of the young lady
who was, a couple of years later, to become his wife,
and subsequently Empress. When at Bonn Prince
William had developed a liking for wild-game shooting,
and accepted an invitation from Duke Frederick of
Schleswig-Holstein to shoot pheasants at Primkenau
Castle, the Duke’s seat in Silesia. More
than one romantic story is current about the first
meeting of the lovers, but that most generally credited,
as it was published at or near the time, represents
the young sportsman as meeting the lady accidentally
in the garden of the castle. He had arrived at
night and gone shooting early next morning before
being introduced to the family of his host, and on
his return surprised the fair-haired and blue-eyed
Princess Auguste Victoria as she lay dozing in a hammock
in the garden. The student approached, the words
“little Rosebud” on his lips, but hastily
withdrew as the Princess, all blushes, awoke.
The pair met shortly afterwards at breakfast, when
the visitor learned who the “little rosebud”
was whom he had surprised. The Princess was then
twenty-two, but looked much younger, a privilege from
nature she still possesses in middle age. The
impression made on the student was deep and lasting,
and the engagement was announced on Valentine’s
Day, in February, 1880. The marriage was celebrated
on February 27th of the following year at the royal
palace in Berlin. Great popular rejoicing marked
the happy occasion, Berlin was gaily flagged to celebrate
the formal entrance of the bride into the capital,
and most other German cities illuminated in her honour.
The imperial bridegroom came from Potsdam at the head
of a military escort selected from his regiment and
preceded the bridal cortege, in which the ancient coronation
carriage, with its smiling occupant, and drawn by eight
prancing steeds, was the principal feature. On
the day following the marriage the young couple went
to Primkenau for the honeymoon.
The marriage with a princess of Schleswig-Holstein
was not only an event of general interest from the
domestic and dynastic point of view. It had also
political significance, for it meant the happy close
of the troubled period of Prussian dealings with those
conquered territories.
A story throwing light on the young
bride’s character is current in connexion with
her wedding. One of the hymns contained a strophe “Should
misfortune come upon us,” which her friends wanted
her to have omitted as striking too melancholy a note.
“No,” she said,
“let it be sung. I don’t
expect my new position to be always a bed of
roses. Prince William is of the same mind, and
we have both determined to bear everything in
common, and thus make what is unpleasant more
endurable.”
Since the marriage their domestic
felicity, as all the world is aware, has never been
troubled, and the example thus given to their subjects
is one of the surest foundations of their influence
and authority in Germany. The secret of this
felicity, affection apart, is to be sought for in
the strong moral sense of the Emperor regarding what
he owes to himself and his people, but no less perhaps
in the exemplary character of the Empress. As
a girl at Primkenau she was a sort of Lady Bountiful
to the aged and sick on the estate, and led there the
simple life of the German country maiden of the time.
It was not the day of electric light and central heating
and the telephone; hardly of lawn tennis, certainly
not of golf and hockey; while motor-cars and militant
suffragettes were alike unknown. Instead of these
delights the Princess, as she then was, was content
with the humdrum life of a German country mansion,
with rare excursions into the great world beyond the
park gates, with her religious observances, her books,
her needlework, her plants and flowers, and her share
in the management of the castle.
These domestic tastes she has preserved,
and the saying, quoted in Germany whenever she is
the subject of conversation, that her character and
tastes are summed up in the four words Kaiser, Kinder,
Kirche, and Kueche Emperor, children,
church, and kitchen is as true as it is
compendious and alliterative. It is often assumed,
especially by men, that a woman who cultivates these
tastes cultivates no other. This is not as true
as is often supposed of the Empress, as a journal
of her voyage to Jerusalem in 1898, published on her
return to Germany, goes to show. Following the
traditions and example of the queens and empresses
who have preceded her, she has always given liberally
of her time and care, as she still does, to the most
multifarious forms of charity. She has a great
and intelligible pride in her clever and energetic
husband, while her interest in her children is proverbial.
She appears to have no ambition to exercise any influence
on politics or to shine as a leader of society.
Like the Emperor, she is not without a sense of humour,
and is always amused by the racy Irish stories (in
dialect) told her and a little circle of guests by
Dr. Mahaffy, of Trinity College, Dublin, who is a welcome
guest at the palace.
The offspring of the marriage, it
may be here noted, is a family of seven children six
sons and a daughter as follows:
Crown Prince Frederick William, born
Prince Eitel Frederick "
Prince Adalbert "
Prince August William "
Prince Oscar "
Prince Joachim "
Princess Victoria Louise " 1892
The Crown Prince was born on June
6th at the Marble Palace in Potsdam. He was educated
at first privately by tutors, and later at the military
academy at Ploen, not far from Kiel. When eighteen
he became of age and began his active career as an
officer in the army. He is now commander of the
First Regiment of Boay Guards ("Death’s Head”
Hussars) at Langfuhr, near Danzig, with the rank of
major. He was married in June, 1905, to Cecilie,
Duchess of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, and is the father
of four children, all boys. The Crown Princess
is one of the cleverest, most popular, and most charming
characters in Germany, of the brightest intelligence
and the most unaffected manners. The leading
trait in the Crown Prince’s character is his
love of sport, from big-game shooting (on which he
has written a book) to lawn tennis. In May last
he began to learn golf. He is personally amiable,
has pleasant manners, and is highly popular with all
classes of his future subjects. He is credited
with ability, but is not believed to have inherited
the intellectual manysidedness of his father.
The only part he can be said to have taken in public
life as yet is having called the imperial attention
to the Maximilian Harden allegations regarding Count
Eulenburg and a court “camarilla,” referred
to later, and having, while sitting in a gallery of
the Reichstag, demonstrated by decidedly marked gestures
his disagreement with the Government’s Morocco
policy.
Since his marriage the Emperor has
more than once publicly congratulated himself on his
good fortune in having such a consort as the Empress.
The most graceful compliment he paid her was in her
own Province of Silesia in 1890, when he said:
“The band which unites me with
the Province that of all the provinces
of the Empire which is nearest to my heart is
the jewel which sparkles at my side, Her Majesty
the Empress. A native of this country, a
model of all the virtues of a German princess,
it is her I have to thank that I am in a position
joyfully to perform the onerous duties of my office.”
Only the other day at Altona, after
thirty years of married life, he referred to her,
again in her home Province and again as she sat smiling
beside him, as the
“first lady of the land, who
is always ready to help the needy, to strengthen
family ties, to discharge the duties of her sex,
and suggest to it new aims. The Empress has bestowed
a home life on the House of Hohenzollern such as Queen
Louise, alone perhaps, conferred.”
Queen Louise, the famous wife of Frederick
William III, died in 1810 and is buried in the mausoleum
at Charlottenburg, the suburb of Berlin. She
has remained ever since, for the German nation, the
type of womanly perfection.