Every great social advance made by
men in the past has been made under the pressure of
public opinion. That public opinion was created
by a free and an unfettered Press. The grim
fact that we are now faced with is that the day of
the free Press is over. Syndicates of capitalists
control the Press of the country, and newspapers whose
circulation approaches a couple of millions create
the opinion their owners desire. The duty of
the newspaper is to record facts, and communicate to
the people the correct data on which public opinion
can be based. If the Press purposely suppresses
what is true, lends itself to the colouring of the
records so that the false seems to be the true and
the true false, then it becomes the greatest public
peril. A generation that is doped with doctored
news can scarcely arrive at the truth. The newspapers
are supplied free by the bureaux of the interested
with news that serve their purpose. Thus it
comes that the machinery for creating public opinion
is largely in the hands of those whose purpose is
that public opinion shall not destroy or lessen their
profits. There are noble exceptions; but, taking
it as a whole, the syndicated Press of this country
is no longer a mirror of the truth.
I
In the United States of America and
in Canada there are one hundred and twenty millions
who speak our language, whose religion is also ours,
who are the most intelligent and hard-headed people
on the face of the earth, yet if one were to believe
what the Press of this country says, one would be
driven to the conclusion that they are poor foolish
idealists who have said farewell to their senses.
And that because the Press serves the public with
doctored news. One day we are told how a hundred
thousand New Yorkers are to march in procession through
the streets demanding the return of their alcoholic
drinks. The columns are full of the preparations
for the greatest uprising of the oppressed and parched
citizens. The great day comes and the procession
is a fiasco. But the syndicated Press omit to
record that only a miserable handful paraded the streets,
the offscourings of the city’s purlieus, amid
the derision of the onlookers. We are later informed
under great headlines that the American Medical Association
or some such society has called for the annulling
of the Prohibition Law. We feel that the climate
is bound to become wet again, for the doctors demand
it. But we soon learn that this particular association
of doctors is a mere fragment of a noble profession-a
fragment separate from the American Association which
corresponds to the British Medical Association.
But the syndicated Press does not record that fact.
The Press that distorts events after that manner
can only flourish among a generation that desires
not the truth.
II
There is nothing more to be desired
than that the people of Great Britain should acquaint
themselves with the facts regarding the greatest social
advance ever made by humanity in a generation.
Can it be the case that the millions of America committed
an act of social folly when they outlawed the liquor
traffic and closed the saloons, and that, awakening
from their dream, they are to restore the traffic in
alcohol and the saloon once more? That is the
impression that a spoon-fed Press seeks to create.
Can it be true?
To answer that question we must ascertain
first whether the prohibition of the sale and manufacture
of alcohol in the States was an act of panic legislation,
the result of a snap vote, the effect of a passing
enthusiasm or a fanaticism that was triumphant for
a moment? If it be of that order, then it may
be expected to be cast aside by a wearied and disillusioned
people. But the movement that prohibited alcohol
across the Atlantic has the toil and sacrifice and
devotion of three generations behind it. It
is not a thing of yesterday. As far back as
1834 the selling of liquor to Indians was forbidden
by law. Seventy-six years ago (in 1846) the first
Prohibition Law was enacted in the State of Maine.
Fifty-seven years ago the Presbyterian General Assembly
excluded liquor distillers and liquor sellers from
the membership of the Church. In 1873 the Women’s
Temperance Crusade movement was inaugurated-a
movement whose ideal was to make the United States
safe for women and children by the suppression of the
saloon. In 1893 the Anti-Saloon League was formed-an
organisation that brought the various societies into
unity and fused them into the strength of steel.
There were long years of work in school and of teaching
in the churches ere on the 18th December 1917 the
Amendment in favour of Prohibition passed the Legislative
Assemblies at Washington. Having passed the
House of Representatives and the Senate, it had to
be ratified by a majority of the various States.
The States had seven years in which to ratify; but
within one year and two months forty-five States,
with a population of over one hundred millions, ratified
the Amendment. Only three out of the forty-eight
States failed to ratify. On the 29th January,
it being certified that three-fourths of the States
had ratified as the Constitution requires, the 18th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,
prohibiting alcohol, became law. And on that
night the leaders of the movement held a service of
thanksgiving in Washington, and when the hour struck
ushering in the first day of the new era, Mr. W. J.
Bryan began his address by reading the words:
‘They are dead that sought the young child’s
life.’ An Amendment to a National Constitution
which has the generations behind it is not one to
be repealed. To repeal it requires now a majority
of three-fourths of the States! The one great
fact to remember, is that by local option two thousand
two hundred and thirty-five counties in the United
States had made an end of the liquor traffic in their
areas before Prohibition became the national law,
and that there were only three hundred and five counties
in all the States which had not declared themselves
dry before Prohibition became the law. If anything
be certain under the sun it is that Prohibition is
the settled and unalterable policy of the United States
of America. During a visit of three months,
and after inquiries in several cities, I never met
a single person who wanted the saloon again reopened
in the States. Whatever criticism might be made,
there was among everybody only one sentiment regarding
the saloon-and that was thankfulness that
it was closed for ever.
III
There are, however, those who desire
the Volstead law defining alcohol amended so that
the sale of beer and light wines may be permitted in
restaurants with meals. To us that seems reasonable;
but there is no chance of such a policy being adopted.
The reason is that these experiments have already
been made in the States and have been found unworkable
and unsatisfactory. The settled policy of the
reformers in the States is to seal up the sources
of drunkenness. Every drunkard began as a moderate
drinker; and the evil has to be stayed at its source.
Mr. Bryan described the process dramatically:
’The moderate drinker says every man should
stop when he has had enough. But the difficulty
is to know when one has had enough, for enough is a
horizon that recedes as one approaches it. A
frail brother was advised by a friend to drink a glass
of sarsaparilla when he had had enough. “That’s
right,” was the reply, “but when I have
had enough I cannot say sarsaparilla!"’ The
prevailing opinion among the Church and social leaders
is that the liquor trade as it was conducted in America
could not be mended, and that it had to be ended.
And it was ended. Having been ended, there
is no possibility of its being amended!
IV
It is one thing to legislate and another
to make that legislation effective. We know
that by experience in this country. It took long
years to make the laws against smuggling operative
in this country; and it was only after Queen Victoria’s
accession that the laws abolishing slavery in the
British Empire, passed in a previous reign, were made
operative. In the States the stage of legislation
regarding alcohol is past, and the stage of making
the legislation effective has come. The difficulty
of making Prohibition operative is great, but the difficulty
is being steadily overcome. No law that ever
was made has been fully successful: otherwise
there would be no theft and no murder in a perfect
world. In one State-Detroit-it
is said that five thousand automobiles are stolen
every year, but nobody ever suggested that the commandment
forbidding theft should be repealed in Detroit.
There are more murders in New York in any one year
than in the whole of Ireland in its most distressful
year, but nobody suggests that the commandment against
murder should be repealed in New York. That a
law is broken is no argument for its repeal.
And notwithstanding all the smuggling there is no
doubt but that the Prohibition Law is obeyed by 99
per cent. of the American people. ’In
Nebraska there are several times as many men in the
penitentiary for stealing automobiles as there are
for violating the liquor laws.’ The persons
who are convicted for breaking the law are the aliens
newly come to the country-Italians, Poles,
Irish, Spaniards. A native-born American scarcely
ever is found among the breakers of the Prohibition
Law, and very seldom a Scotsman. But the newspapers
themselves are the proof of this. If the disregard
of Prohibition were the general thing, the newspapers
would cease to record it; for according to the
Press news is the exceptional. To walk to business
every day is commonplace and receives no record; but
to be run down in the traffic and break a limb is
news. That receives its paragraph. It
is the exceptional that receives the big headlines.
And the big headlines about smuggling across the
Canadian border and from the Bahama Islands or about
wood alcohol are the proof that these things are exceptional.
Otherwise they would not be news. That ethical
passion which passed the 18th Amendment is now being
diverted to its enforcement. The traffic across
the Canadian border is being stopped, for Canada is
now going dry. The traffic from the Bahamas
under the British flag is being dealt with. ’We
shall move heaven and earth to make Prohibition effective,’
said the orator. ’You had better move
the Bahamas,’ came the reply. It would
be a disaster if the false impression created in this
country by the syndicated Press regarding the working
of Prohibition in the States were to lead those in
authority to imagine that the people of the States
will regard with no indignation the British flag being
used for the flouting of the laws and of the Constitution
of the United States. It is impossible that
that can go on. Everywhere in the States the
organisation for making Prohibition effective is being
tightened up. In social reform the citizens
of the States are determined to lead the world.
I for one am convinced that they will not be turned
from their chosen path or deflected from their goal
by bootleggers or by Jewish syndicates. Whoever
will judge of the condition of the States regarding
Prohibition from the newspapers in New York will find
themselves misled. ’In New York,’
says The World,, ’it will be necessary
to install three enforcement agents to a family, so
that they can stand in three eight-hour shifts, or
hire the entire population of the city as special
enforcement agents and set every man to watch himself.’
That is the sort of piffle that is supplied gratis
to the newspapers in this country. What is forgotten
is the fact that the millions of homes where the fathers
and mothers live and toil, who have carried the law,
say nothing. Their voice is not heard in their
Press. And they have not weakened in their resolution
that their country shall be a country where children
shall grow up untempted and where monopolies shall
no longer be free to fill the jails and the poorhouses.
No amount of jibes can alter the fact that there
has been no ethical revolution in the history of the
world comparable to that passion for righteousness
which passed the 18th Amendment and which is now determined
to enforce it. ‘Our parents,’ said
a wet orator lately, ’taught us to lay up something
for a rainy day: how much nicer if they had only
taught us to lay up something for a dry one.’
The American will make any number of jokes about
his climate, but his determination is unalterable that
it shall be dry. There has been no great moral
advance made by humanity in these last centuries which
has been unable to hold its ground. Whatever
dust may be thrown in their eyes, the people of this
country may be certain that there will be no repeal.
When the choice is ‘Repeal’ or ‘Enforce,’
the American chooses unhesitatingly. ‘Enforce’
becomes his watchword.
V
Though in the Western States full
enforcement of the Prohibition Law has not been effected
so far, yet the beneficial effects of the closing
of the saloons are so many and great, that he who runs
may read. There were four millions idle in the
States at the time when I was there, but the nation
was going through the greatest industrial crisis in
its history with perfect calm, and without suffering
the pangs of destitution, because workmen no longer
wasted their money in the saloons. Here in Britain
the idle have been pauperised by doles from the public
exchequer; in the United States there have been no
doles. The nation can thus come through a crisis
of unemployment without half its number becoming a
charge on the remainder. That is possible because
the sources of waste are sealed up. Statistics
amply prove that drunkenness is rapidly disappearing.
The Salvation Army ceased its rescue work among the
drunkards in New York because there were no more drunkards
to be rescued. In Pittsburg I found the jail
well-nigh empty and the poorhouse without sufficient
inmates to keep it clean. It is the same everywhere.
One great employer of labour, whose opinion I asked,
said: ‘Prohibition has given us a good Monday
in our factory.’ That was the most terse
and effective testimony to Prohibition that I heard.
There is no broken time owing to drunkenness.
Industrial efficiency has been increased 20 per cent.
One man who had an interest in a big hotel told me
that the profits from soft drinks (non-alcoholic)
were last year double the profit they used to make
by the sale of alcohol. Hotels never had such
a time of prosperity as they have had lately.
The reason is that men can bring their wives and
children to stay at the hotels with perfect safety.
The proprietor of the biggest hotel in a city where
I stayed told me that he was glad to be rid of the
bar and that he would never have it back on any account.
A Canadian-Scot who has prospered greatly told me how
he became a Prohibitionist. ‘I am interested
in a mine in the north,’ said he, ’and
I went to visit it. I saw the men wasting their
substance and their lives in the saloons-lying
around drugged, with their pockets empty. It
was shocking. I used to give $500 to fight Prohibition.
When the wet agent came to my office after that for
my subscription, I said: “Get out!
I’ll give $500 a year in the future to make
an end of all saloons!” It is thus the movement
spreads. The moderate drinker is as determined
as the Rechabites that the saloon shall never open
its door again-and it never will.
One of the oddest testimonies in behalf of the success
of the new law was this saying: ’In Detroit
there has been a falling off in the taxi-cab trade.’
The inference is that everybody can walk home now.
‘We saw,’ says Mr. Harold Spender, ’only
a single drunken man in America for three weeks, and
then he was a politician going to Washington.’
In a period of three months I saw none. Though
this reform has been in operation for so short a time,
it has already effected the greatest miracle in modern
history. It has healed the sick by the hundred
thousand and it has raised the dead.
VI
The readers of the commercialised
Press when they scan the inspired articles regarding
America’s social uprising have only to use their
common-sense to realise that they are being served
up falsehoods. They have only to think what
a mighty change for the betterment of humanity has
been wrought in the great cities where alcohol no longer
seeks and lies in wait for the unwary at every street
corner. Instead of liquor seeking him, the drouth
must now seek the liquor-and the search
is a toilsome one in a dry and parched land.
What a deliverance that must be for the weak-willed
when the State no longer, by licensed premises every
few yards in the crowded streets, tempts them to take
the road to pauperism and destruction. They
have only to think of the lives of rich and poor whom
they themselves knew, that have made shipwreck on
these rocks and shoals, and think what a deliverance
has come to the nation that no longer, with the marshalled
host of its liquor sellers, seeks to enslave and destroy
its citizens. They have only to look at the
city of their habitation and ask themselves why it
is that so many hundred thousand of their fellow-citizens
live under conditions that mean unspeakable misery.
Why are families doomed to one-roomed houses? why
are children reared under conditions that mean their
being damned before they are born? The answer
is-Alcohol! In proportion to the
number of public-houses in any district is the misery
of the housing conditions. You have but to scratch
the surface of human misery anywhere in our cities
and you find the turgid stream of alcohol. Let
the reader of the subsidised Press ask himself why
all the money spent on clearing and cleaning slums
has wrought no result? It is that alcohol creates
new slums faster than the old are cleared away.
Let him ask why all the money spent in mission work,
in philanthropic work, in rescue work, has not diminished
the mass of human misery; and the answer is-Alcohol!
Let him think of the money now wasted by the workers
in the reeking public-houses being used to clothe and
feed and house the children-and what wonderful
cities we would have and what a new race we would
become. And all that has been done in the United
States and in Canada. ‘Our great claim
as Prohibitionists,’ said Admiral Sims, ’is
that it has shut up the schools of future drunkards,
the saloons and the clubs. We have saved the
rising generation.’ No amount of misrepresentations
can alter facts. The Americans are not fools.
They know their own business. ‘In every
community,’ said President Harding recently,
’men and women have had an opportunity to know
what Prohibition means. They know that debts
are more promptly paid, that men take home the wages
that once were wasted in saloons, that families are
better clothed and fed, and more money finds its way
into the savings bank. In another generation
I believe that liquor will have disappeared, not merely
from our politics, but from our memories.’
VII
Great Britain led the world in the
deliverance of humanity from the degradation of slavery;
the United States and Canada are leading the world
in the still greater deliverance of humanity from the
degradation of alcohol. Out of the West cometh
the world’s salvation. America, that is
for ever singing of itself as the ‘sweet land
of liberty,’ is now the seat of the greatest
experiment in personal coercion that the world has
known. And that is because the American has freed
his mind from cant. He has replaced the conception
of liberty as liberty to do as we like by the conception
of liberty which is the liberation of large masses
of the community from thraldom to their base appetites
and from the oppression of grafters and profiteers.
The main cause of that deliverance was the awakened
conscience of the people. When the power to
veto licences was placed in the hands of the people,
the citizens became conscious of the fact that when
they voted for a licence they were just as much partners
in the saloon as if they furnished the liquor and
sold it standing behind the bar. When they considered
that the poisoning of the poor by alcohol was a road
to wealth, when they traced the misery and ruin that
afflicted the community to the saloons, they felt
that they could not any longer be sharers in the traffic
nor incur responsibility for it. It was the
Churches of the land that wakened the conscience of
the people. It was better that any community
perish rather than that they should offend one of the
little ones for which Christ died.... What we
need is that the conscience of the community should
be wakened in the same manner. The Church of
Christ alone can sound the trumpet that wakens from
the slumber of torpor. But the Church seems more
concerned about dealing out soothing syrup to its
soporific members than about wakening the dead.
The spectacle of bishops denouncing Prohibition in
the name of Freedom; of representative Church Councils
refusing to recommend the cause of No-Licence; of
congregations being narcotised to the slaughter of
the innocents that goes on ceaselessly all around
them-the victims of Bacchus laid for ever
on his altar-while the preacher proclaims
peace, peace, where there is no peace, and expounds
an evangel of sweetness and light while the people
are perishing-all that may well make angels
weep. But the Churches are wakening. The
founder of Christianity prayed, ‘Lead us not
into temptation,’ and Christians cannot for ever
acquiesce in the State tempting its own children to
their destruction. Just as we look back and marvel
how any Christian could ever defend slavery, so fifty
years hence, when the liquor traffic will have become
a memory, men will marvel how Christians could ever
have defended the Liquor Trade and looked on, silent,
while it swept the young and the strong to doom.