And the Double-Marriage, in such circumstances,
are we to consider it as dead, then? In the soul
of Queen Sophie and those she can influence, it lives
flame-bright; but with all others it has fallen into
a very dim state. Friedrich Wilhelm is still
privately willing, perhaps in a degree wishful; but
the delays, the supercilious neglects have much disgusted
him; and he, in the mean while, entertains those new
speculations. George II., never a lover of the
Prussian Majesty’s nor loved by him, has been
very high and distant ever since his Accession; offensive
rather than otherwise. He also is understood to
be vaguely willing for the thing; willing enough,
would it be so kind as accomplish itself without trouble
to him. But the settlements, the applications
to Parliament:-and all for this perverse
Fred, who has become unlovely, and irritates our royal
mind? George pushes the matter into its pigeon-holes
again, when brought before him. Higher thoughts
occupy the soul of little George. Congress of
Soissons, Convention of the Pardo, [Or, in effect,
“Treaty of Madrid,” 6th March, 1728.
This was the PREFACE to Soissons; Termagant at length
consenting there, “at her Palace of the Pardo”
(Kaiser and all the world urging her for ten months
past), to accept the Peace, and leave off besieging
Gibraltar to no purpose (Coxe, .] Treaty of
Seville; a part to be acted on the world-theatre,
with applauses, with envies, almost from the very
demi-gods? Great Kaisers, overshadowing Nature
with their Pragmatic Sanctions, their preternatural
Diplomacies, and making the Terrestrial Balance reel
hither and thither;-Kaisers to be clenched
perhaps by one’s dexterity of grasp, and the
Balance steadied again? Prussian Double-Marriage!
One royal soul there is who never
will consent to have the Double-Marriage die:
Queen Sophie. She had passed her own private
act-of-parliament for it; she was a very obstinate
wife, to a husband equally obstinate. “JE
BOULEVERSERAI L’EMPIRE,” writes she
once; “I will overturn the German Empire,”
if they drive me to it, in this matter. [Letter copied
by Dubourgay (in Despatch, marked PRIVATE, to Lord
Townshend, 3d-14th May, 1729); no clear address given,-probably
to Dubourgay himself, CONVEYED by “a Lady”
(one of the Queen’s Ladies), as he dimly intimates.]
What secret manoeuvring and endeavoring went on unweariedly
on royal Sophie’s part, we need not say; nor
in what bad element, of darkness and mendacity, of
eavesdropping, rumoring, backstairs intriguing, the
affair now moved. She corresponds on it with
Queen Caroline of England; she keeps her two children
true to it, especially her Son, the more important
of them.
CROWN-PRINCE FRIEDRICH WRITES CERTAIN LETTERS.
Queen Sophie did not overturn the Empire, but she did almost
overturn her own and her familys existence, by these courses; which were not
wise in her case. It is certain she persuaded Crown-Prince Friedrich, who
was always his Mothers boy, and who perhaps needed little bidding in this
instance, to write to Queen Caroline of England; Letters one or several:
thrice-dangerous Letters; setting forth (in substance), His deathless affection
to that Beauty of the world, her Majestys divine Daughter the Princess Amelia
(a very paragon of young women, to judge by her picture and ones own
imagination); and likewise the firm resolution he, Friedrich Crown-Prince, has
formed, and the vow he hereby makes, Either to wed that celestial creature when
permitted, or else never any of the Daughters of Eve in this world.
Congresses of Soissons, Smoking Parliaments, Preliminaries of the Pardo and
Treaties of Seville may go how they can. If well, it shall be well:
if not well, here is my vow, solemn promise and unchangeable determination,
which your gracious Majesty is humbly entreated to lay up in the tablets of your
royal heart, and to remember on my behalf, should bad days arise!-
It is clear such Letters were sent;
at what date first beginning, we do not know;-possibly
before this date? Nor would matters rise to the
vowing pitch all at once. One Letter, supremely
dangerous should it come to be known, Wilhelmina has
copied for us, [Wilhelmina, .]-in
Official style (for it is the Mother’s composition
this one) and without date to it:-the guessable
date is about two years hence; and we will give the
poor Document farther on, if there be place for it.
Such particulars are yet deeply unknown
to Friedrich Wilhelm; but he surmises the general
drift of things in that quarter; and how a disobedient
Son, crossing his Father’s will in every point,
abets his Mother’s disobedience, itself audacious
enough, in regard to this one. It is a fearful
aggravation of Friedrich Wilhelm’s ill-humor
with such a Son, which has long been upon the growing
hand. His dislikes, we know, were otherwise neither
few nor small. Mere “disLIKES” properly
so called, or dissimilarities to Friedrich Wilhelm,
a good many of them; dissimilarities also to a Higher
Pattern, some! But these troubles of the Double-Marriage
will now hurry them, the just and the unjust of them,
towards the flaming pitch. The poor youth has
a bad time; and the poor Father too, whose humor we
know! Surly gusts of indignation, not unfrequently
cuffs and strokes; or still worse, a settled aversion,
and rage of the chronic kind; studied neglect and
contempt,-so as not even to help him at
table, but leave him fasting while the others eat;
[Dubourgay, SCAPIUS.] this the young man has to bear.
The innumerable maltreatments, authentically chronicled
in Wilhelmina’s and the other Books, though
in a dateless, unintelligible manner, would make a
tragic sum!-Here are two Billets, copied
from the Prussian State-Archives, which will show
us to what height matters had gone, in this the young
man’s seventeenth year.
TO HIS MAJESTY (from the Crown-Prince).
“WUSTERHAUSEN, 11th September, 1728.
MY DEAR PAPA,-I have not,
for a long while, presumed to come to my dear Papa;
partly because he forbade me; but chiefly because I
had reason to expect a still worse reception than
usual: and, for fear of angering my dear Papa
by my present request, I have preferred making it in
writing to him.
I therefore beg my dear Papa to be
gracious to me; and can here say that, after long
reflection, my conscience has not accused me of any
the least thing with which I could reproach myself.
But if I have, against my will and knowledge, done
anything that has angered my dear Papa, I herewith
most submissively beg forgiveness; and hope my dear
Papa will lay aside that cruel hatred which I cannot
but notice in all his treatment of me. I could
not otherwise suit myself to it; as I always thought
I had a gracious Papa, and now have to see the contrary.
I take confidence, then, and hope that my dear Papa
will consider all this, and again be gracious to me.
And, in the mean while, I assure him that I will never,
all my days, fail with my will; and, notwithstanding
his disfavor to me, remain
“My dear Papa’s
“Most faithful and obedient Servant and Son,
“FRIEDRICH.”
To which Friedrich Wilhelm, by return
of messenger, writes what follows. Very implacable,
we may perceive;-not calling his Petitioner
“Thou,” as kind Paternity might have dictated;
infinitely less by the polite title “They (SIE),”
which latter indeed, the distinguished title of “SIC,”
his Prussian Majesty, we can remark, reserves for Foreigners
of the supremest quality, and domestic Princes of
the Blood; naming all other Prussian subjects, and
poor Fritz in this place, “He (ER),” in
the style of a gentleman to his valet,-which
style even a valet of these new days of ours would
be unwilling to put up with. “ER, He,”
“His” and the other derivatives sound
loftily repulsive in the German ear; and lay open
impassable gulfs between the Speaker and the Spoken-to.
“His obstinate”-But we must, after all, say THY and THOU for
intelligibilitys sake:-
“Thy obstinate perverse disposition
[KOPF, head], which does not love thy Father,-for
when one does everything [everything commanded] and
really loves one’s Father, one does what the
Father requires, not while he is there to see it,
but when his back is turned too [His Majesty’s
style is very abstruse, ill-spelt, intricate, and in
this instance trips itself, and falls on its face
here, a mere intricate nominative without a verb!]-For
the rest, thou know’st very well that I can endure
no effeminate fellow (EFEMINIRTEN KERL), who has no
human inclination in him; who puts himself to shame,
cannot ride nor shoot; and withal is dirty in his
person; frizzles his hair like a fool, and does not
cut it off. And all this I have, a thousand times,
reprimanded; but all in vain, and no improvement in
nothing (KEINE BESSERUNG IN NITS IST).
For the rest, haughty, proud as a churl; speaks to
nobody but some few, and is not popular and affable;
and cuts grimaces with his face, as if he were a fool;
and does my will in nothing unless held to it by force;
nothing out of love;-and has pleasure in
nothing but following his own whims [own KOPF],-no
use to him in anything else. This is the answer.
“FRIEDRICH WILHELM.”
[Preuss, ; from Cramer, pp. 33, 34.]
DOUBLE-MARRIAGE PROJECT RE-EMERGES IN AN OFFICIAL SHAPE.
These are not favorable outlooks for
the Double-Marriage. Nevertheless it comes and
goes; and within three weeks later, we are touched
almost with a kind of pity to see it definitely emerging
in a kind of Official state once more. For the
question is symbolical of important political questions.
The question means withal, What is to be done in these
dreadful Congress-of-Soissons complexities, and mad
reelings of the Terrestrial Balance? Shall we
hold by a dubious and rather losing Kaiser of this
kind, in spite of his dubieties, his highly inexplicit,
procedures (for which he may have reasons) about the
Promise of Julich and Berg? Or shall we not clutch
at England, after all,-and perhaps bring
him to terms? The Smoking Parliament had no Hansard;
but, we guess its Debates (mostly done in dumb-show)
were cloudy, abstruse and abundant, at this time!
The Prussian Ministers, if they had any power, take
different sides; old Ilgen, the oldest and ablest of
them, is strong for England.
Enough, in the beginning of October,
Queen Sophie, “by express desire of his Majesty,”
who will have explicit, Yes or No on that matter, writes
to England, a Letter “PRIVATE AND OFFICIAL,”
of such purport,-Letter (now invisible)
which Dubourgay is proud to transmit. [Despatch, 5th
October, 1728, in State-Paper Office.] Dubourgay is
proud; and old Ilgen, her Majesty informed me on the
morrow, “wept for joy,” so zealous was
he on that side. Poor old gentleman,-respectable
rusty old Iron Safe with seven locks, which nobody
would now care to pick,-he died few weeks
after, at his post as was proper; and saw no Double-Marriage,
after all. But Dubourgay shakes out his feathers;
the Double-Marriage being again evidently alive.
For England answers, cordially enough,
if not, with all the hurry Friedrich Wilhelm wanted,
“Yea, we are willing for the thing;”-and
meets, with great equanimity and liberality, the new
whims, difficulties and misgivings, which arose on
Friedrich Wilhelm’s part, at a wearisome rate,
as the negotiation went on; and which are always frankly
smoothed away again by the cooler party. Why
did not the bargain close, then? Alas, one finds,
the answer YEA had unfortunately set his Prussian
Majesty on viewing, through magnifiers, what advantages
there might have been in NO: this is a difficulty
there is no clearing away! Probably, too, the
Tobacco-Parliament was industrious. Friedrich
Wilhelm, at last, tries if Half will not do; anxious,
as we all too much are, “to say Yes AND No;”
being in great straits, poor man:-“Your
Prince of Wales to wed Wilhelmina at once; the other
Match to stand over?” To which the English Government
answers always briefly, “No; both the Marriages
or none!”-Will the reader consent to a few compressed glances into the
extinct Dubourgay Correspondence; much compressed, and here and there a
rushlight stuck in it, for his behoof. Dubourgay, at Berlin, writes; my
Lord Townshend, in St. Jamess reads, usually rather languid in answering:-
BERLIN, 9th NOVEMBER, 1728. “Prussian
Majesty much pleased with English Answers” to
the Yes-or-No question: “will send a Minister
to our Court about the time his Britannic Majesty
may think of coming over to his German Dominions.
Would Finkenstein (Head Tutor), or would Knyphausen
(distinguished Official here), be the agreeable man?”
“Either,” answer the English; “either
is good.”
BERLIN, SAME DATE. “Queen
sent for me just now; is highly content with the state
of things. ‘I have now,’ said her
Majesty, ’the pleasure to tell you that I am
free, God be blessed, of all the anguish I have labored
under for some time past, which was so great that I
have several times been on the point of sending for
you to procure my Brother’s protection for my
Son, who, I thought, ran the greatest danger from the
artifices of Seckendorf and’”-Poor
Queen!
NOV, 16th. “Queen told
me: When the Court was at Wusterhausen,”
two months ago, hunting partridges and wild swine,
[Fassmann, .] “Seckendorf and Grumkow
intrigued for a match between Wilhelmina and the Prince
of Weissenfels,” elderly Royal Highness in the
Abstract, whom we saw already, “thereby to prevent
a closer union between the Prussian and English Courts,-and
Grumkow having withal the private view of ousting
his antagonist the Prince of Anhalt [Old Dessauer,
whom he had to meet in duel, but did not fight], as
Weissenfels, once Son-in-law, would certainly be made
Commander-in-Chief,” [Dubourgay, in State-Paper
Office (Prussian Despatches, vol. XXXV.)]
to the extrusion of Anhalt from that office.
Which notable piece of policy her Majesty, by a little
plain speech, took her opportunity of putting an end
to, as we saw. For the rest, “the Dutch
Minister and also the French Secretaries here,”
greatly interested about the peace of Europe, and
the Congress of Soissons in these weeks, “have
had a communication from this Court, of the favorable
disposition ours is in with respect to the Double Match,”-beneficent for
the Terrestrial Balance, as they and I hope. So that things look well?
Alas,-
DECEMBER 25th. “Queen sent
for me yesterday: Hopes she does no wrong in
complaining of her Husband to her Brother. King
shows scruples about the Marriages; does not relish
the expense of an establishment for the Prince; hopes,
at all events, the Marriage will not take place for
a year yet;-would like to know what Dowry
the English Princess is to bring?”-“No
Dowry with our Princess,” the English answer;
“nor shall you give any with yours.”
NEW-YEAR’S DAY, 1729. “Queen
sent for me: King is getting intractable about
the Marriages; she reasoned with him from two o’clock
till eight,” without the least permanent effect.
“It is his covetousness,” I Dubourgay
privately think!-Knyphausen, who knows the
King well, privately tells me, “He will come
round.” “It is his avarice,”
thinks Knyphausen too; “nay it is also his jealousy
of the Prince, who is very popular with the Army.
King does everything to mortify him, uses him like
a child; Crown-Prince bears it with admirable patience.”
This is Knyphausen’s weak notion; rather a weak
creaky official gentleman, I should gather, of a cryptosplenetic
turn. “Queen told me some days later, His
Majesty ill-used the Crown-Prince, because he did not
drink hard enough; makes him hunt though ill;”
is very hard upon the poor Crown-Prince,-who,
for the rest, “sends loving messages to England,”
as usual; [Dubourgay, 16th January.] covertly meaning
the Princess Amelia, as usual. “Some while
ago, I must inform your Lordship, the Prince was spoken
to,” by Papa as would appear, “to sound
his inclination as to the Princess Caroline,”
Princess likewise of England, and whose age, some
eighteen months less than his own, might be suitabler,
the Princess Amelia being half a year his elder; [Caroline
born 10th June 1713; Amelia, 10th July, 1711.] “but,”-mark
how true he stood,-“his Royal Highness
broke out into such raptures of love and passion for
the Princess Amelia, and showed so much impatience
for the conclusion of that Match, as gave the King
of Prussia a great deal of surprise, and the Queen
as much satisfaction.” Truth is, if an old
Brigadier Diplomatist may be judge, “The great
and good qualities of that young Prince, both of person
and mind, deserve a distinct and particular account,
with which I shall trouble your Lordship another day;”
[Despatch, 25th December, 1728.]-which unluckily
I never did; his Lordship Townshend having, it would
seem, too little curiosity on the subject.
And so the matter wavers; and in spite
of Dubourgay’s and Queen Sophie’s industry,
and the Crown-Prince’s willing mind, there can
nothing definite be made of it at this time.
Friedrich Wilhelm goes on visits, goes on huntings;
leaves the matter to itself to mature a little.
Thus the negotiation hangs fire; and will do so,-till
dreadful waterspouts come, and perhaps quench it altogether?
HIS MAJESTY SLAUGHTERS 3,602 HEAD OF WILD SWINE.
His Majesty is off for a Hunting Visit
to the Old Dessauer,-Crown-Prince with
him, who hates hunting. Then, “19th January,
1729,” says the reverential Fassmann, he is off
for a grand hunt at Copenick; then for a grander in
Pommern (Crown-Prince still with him): such a
slaughter of wild swine as was seldom heard of, and
as never occurred again. No fewer than “1,882
head (STUCK) of wild swine, 300 of them of uncommon
magnitude,” in the Stettin and other Pommern
regions; “together with 1,720 STUCK in the Mark
Brandenburg, once 450 in a day: in all, 3,602
STUCK.” Never was his Majesty in better
spirits: a very Nimrod or hunting Centaur; trampling
the cobwebs of Diplomacy, and the cares of life, under
his victorious hoofs. All this slaughter of swine,
3,602 STUCK by tale, was done in the season 1729.
“From which,” observes the adoring Fassmann,
[.] “is to be inferred the importance,”
at least in wild swine, “of those royal Forests
in Pommern and the Mark;” not to speak of his
Majesty’s supreme talent in hunting, as in other
things.
What Friedrich Wilhelm did with such
a mass of wild pork? Not an ounce of it was wasted,
every ounce of it brought money in. For there
exist Official Schedules, lists as for a window-tax
or property-tax, drawn up by his Majesty’s contrivance,
in the chief Localities: every man, according
to the house he keeps, is bound to take, at a just
value by weight, such and such quotities of suddenly
slaughtered wild swine, one or so many,-and
consume them at his leisure, as ham or otherwise,-cash
payable at a fixed term, and no abatement made. [Forster,
Beneckendorf (if they had an Index I).] For this is
a King that cannot stand waste at all; thrifty himself,
and the Cause of thrift.
FALLS ILL, IN CONSEQUENCE; AND THE DOUBLE-MARRIAGE CANNOT GET FORWARD.
This was one of Friedrich Wilhelm’s
grandest hunting-bouts, this of January, 1729; at
all events, he will never have another such. By
such fierce riding, and defiance of the winter elements
and rules of regimen, his Majesty returned to Potsdam
with ill symptoms of health;-symptoms never
seen before; except transiently, three years ago, after
a similar bout; when the Doctors, shaking their heads,
had mentioned the word “Gout.”-NARREN-POSSEN!”
Friedrich Wilhelm had answered, “Gout?”-But
now, February, 1729, it is gout in very deed.
His poor Majesty has to admit: “I am gouty,
then! Shall have gout for companion henceforth.
I am breaking up, then?” Which is a terrible
message to a man. His Majesty’s age is
not forty-one till August coming; but he has hunted
furiously.
Adoring Fassmann gives a quite touching
account of Friedrich Wilhelm’s performances
under gout, now and generally, which were begun on
this occasion. How he suffered extremely, yet
never neglected his royal duties in any press of pain.
Could seldom get any sleep till towards four or five
in the morning, and then had to be content with an
hour or two; after which his Official Secretaries
came in with their Papers, and he signed, despatched,
resolved, with best judgment,-the top of
the morning always devoted to business. At noon,
up if possible; and dines, “in dressing-gown,
with Queen and children.” After dinner,
commonly to bed again; and would paint in oil; sometimes
do light joiner-work, chiselling and inlaying; by
and by lie inactive with select friends sitting round,
some of whom had the right of entry, others not, under
penalties. Buddenbrock, Derschau, rough old Marlborough
stagers, were generally there; these, “and two
other persons,”-Grumkow and Seckendorf,
whom Fassmann does not name, lest he get into trouble,-“sat,
well within earshot, round the bed. And always
at the head was TheirO Majesty the Queen, sometimes
with the King’s hand laid in hers, and his face
turned up to her, as if he sought assuagement”-O
my dim old Friend, let us dry our tears!
“Sometimes the Crown-Prince
read aloud in some French Book,” Title not given;
Crown-Prince’s voice known to me as very fine.
Generally the Princess Louisa was in the room, too;
Louisa, who became of Anspach shortly; not Wilhelmina,
who lies in fever and relapse and small-pox, and close
at death’s door, almost since the beginning of
these bad days. The Crown-Prince reads, we say,
with a voice of melodious clearness, in French more
or less instructive. “At other times there
went on discourse, about public matters, foreign news,
things in general; discourse of a cheerful or of a
serious nature,” always with some substance
of sense in it,-“and not the least
smut permitted, as is too much the case in certain
higher circles!” says adoring Fassmann; who
privately knows of “Courts” (perhaps the
GLORWURDIGSTE, Glory-worthiest, August the Great’s
Court, for one?) “with their hired Tom-Fools,”
not yet an extinct species attempting to ground wit
on that bad basis. Prussian Majesty could not
endure any “ZOTEN:” profanity and
indecency, both avaunt. “He had to hold
out in this way, awake till ten o’clock, for
the chance of night’s sleep.” Earlier
in the afternoon, we said, he perhaps does a little
in oil-painting, having learnt something of that art
in young times;-there is a poor artist in
attendance, to mix the colors, and do the first sketch
of the thing. Specimens of such Pictures still
exist, Portraits generally; all with this epigraph,
FREDERICUS WILHELMUS IN TORMENTIS PINXIT (Painted
by Friedrich Wilhelm in his torments); and are worthy
the attention of the curious. [Fassmann, ; see
Forster, &c.] Is not this a sublime patient?
Fassmann admits, “there might
be spurts of IMpatience now and then; but how richly
did Majesty make it good again after reflection!
He was also subject to whims even about people whom
he otherwise esteemed. One meritorious gentleman,
who shall be nameless, much thought of by the King,
his Majesty’s nerves could not endure, though
his mind well did: ’Makes my gout worse
to see him drilling in the esplanade there; let another
do it!’-and vouchsafed an apologetic
assurance to the meritorious gentleman afflicted in
consequence.”-O my dim old Friend,
these surely are sublimities of the sick-bed?
“So it lasted for some five weeks long,”
well on towards the summer of this bad year 1729.
Wilhelmina says, in briefer business language, and
looking only at the wrong side of the tapestry, “It
was a Hell-on-Earth to us, Les peines du Purgatoire
ne pouvaient égaler celles que NOUS endurions;"
[.] and supports the statement by abundant examples,
during those flamy weeks.
For, in the interim, withal, the English
negotiation is as good as gone out; nay there are
waterspouts brewing aloft yonder, enough to wash negotiation
from the world. Of which terrible weather-phenomena
we shall have to speak by and by: but must first,
by way of commentary, give a glance at Soissons and
the Terrestrial LIBRA, so far as necessary for human
objects,-not far, by any means.